title: A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools.
abstract: This paper critiques pressure sore risk assessment tools. No attempt is made to describe individual tools in detail as this literature is available elsewhere. The economic case for risk assessment is presented along with the criteria for an effective risk assessment instrument. Reliability and validity studies are reviewed in relation to three risk assessment tools: Norton, Waterlow and Braden. Finally a number of issues related to threshold scores, research design and the need to view pressure sores as a clinical problem rather than a nursing problem are discussed.
authors.forename: L N
authors.initials: LN
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Booth
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Douglas
authors.forename: W R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Robertson
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Walker
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Durie
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fraser
authors.forename: E H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: Hillan
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Swaffield
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009730:Nursing Assessment; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000451:nursing*; D012107:Research Design; D012307:Risk Factors