title: Unstable angina: cost of conservative and invasive strategies using TIMI3 B as a model.
abstract: Obviously, conservative therapy would be less expensive than invasive therapy if patients were held in the conservative category and received only medical therapy along with exercise test with thallium. However, based on the TIMI 3 B outcomes, costs are similar (but not equal) even if one attempts a conservative strategy since a significant number of patients in the early conservative arm underwent angiography (64 patients) and PTCA (26 patients) or surgery (24 patients) and the number of days for rehospitalization was greater in the early conservative than in the early invasive group. I believe the TIMI 3 B study reflects the reality of clinical practice in 1995. It seems to me that either strategy is acceptable both from the medical and economic outcome standpoints. Given the model used here, I do not think that the early invasive strategy will ever be cheaper than the early conservative strategy unless all of the patients in the early conservative strategy who eventually are revascularized have CABG, and all of the patients in the early invasive strategy who are revascularized have PTCA.
authors.forename: C R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Conti
mesh_terms: D000789:Angina, Unstable / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy*; D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000191:economics; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000191:economics; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'