title: Heart transplantation charges: status 1 versus status 2 patients.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The current health care environment mandates closer scrutiny of health care dollar allocation. To better understand the distribution of heart transplantation costs, we reviewed hospital and physician billing of patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between August 1988 and September 1993.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study is a retrospective review of 107 consecutive cases. Charges and clinical results of United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 patients (n = 46), including 17 bridge to transplantation patients, were compared with those of United Network for Organ Sharing status 2 patients (n = 57). Charges were converted to 1992 dollars.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During the first 12 months of the study, 77% of heart transplantations were performed in United Network for Organ Sharing status 2 patients, whereas over the last 12-month period, 25% of the transplantations were performed in status 2 patients. No significant differences were found in age, gender, type of cardiomyopathy, or survival between the status 1 and status 2 groups. The length of hospitalization for the status 1 group ranged from 8 to 138 days (mean 49 days) as opposed to 5 to 82 days (mean 17.5 days) for the status 2 group (p < 0.0001). Pretransplantation hospital charges were significantly higher for the status 1 group ($47,917 to $341,215, mean $109,116) when compared with status 2 ($0 to $10,035, mean $250) (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found in posttransplantation hospital charges between status 1 ($47,917 to $210,027, mean $95,379) and status 2 patients ($48,093 to $380,745, mean $102,265). Total charges were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) for the status 1 group ($89,910 to $512,331, mean $239,375) when compared with the status 2 group ($63,885 to $455,680, mean $128,594). Total transplantation charges for the study period were $18,341,108. This amount could have paid for 77 status 1 transplantations or 143 status 2 transplantations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  If current trends continue and the donor pool remains the same, most transplant recipients will be status 1, resulting in a comparable number of transplantations performed at twice the charges.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO 63110-0250, USA.
authors.forename: T V
authors.initials: TV
authors.lastname: Votapka
authors.forename: M T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Swartz
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Reedy
authors.forename: D P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Lohmann
authors.forename: L R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: McBride
authors.forename: L W
authors.initials: LW
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: D G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Pennington
mesh_terms: D009202:Cardiomyopathies / Q000191:economics* / Q000601:surgery*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005251:Fees, Medical; D005260:Female; D016027:Heart Transplantation / Q000191:economics*; D017722:Hospital Charges; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies