Conditions, interventions, and outcomes in nursing research: a comparative analysis of North American and European/International journals. (1981-1990).
This study compared the conceptual foci and methodological characteristics of research projects which tested the effects of nursing interventions, published in four general nursing research journals with predominantly North American, and two with predominantly European/International authorship and readership. Dimensions and variables of comparison included: nature of subjects, design issues, statistical methodology, statistical power, and types of interventions and outcomes. Although some differences emerged, the most striking and consistent finding was that there were no statistically significant differences (and thus similarities) in the content foci and methodological parameters of the intervention studies published in both groups of journals. We conclude that European/International and North American nursing intervention studies, as reported in major general nursing research journals, are highly similar in the parameters studied, yet in need of overall improvement. Certainly, there is no empirical support for the common (explicit or implicit) ethnocentric American bias that leadership in nursing intervention research resides with and in the United States of America.
Abraham
I L
IL
University of Virginia, Center on Aging and Health, Charlottesville 22903, USA.
Chalifoux
Z L
ZL
Evers
G C
GC
De Geest
S
S
D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D002648:Child; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009656:North America; D009729:Nursing; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000145:classification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D012107:Research Design; D012494:Sampling Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome