Evaluating clinical educators: an employer's perspective.
An Australian school of nursing's attempt to introduce an evaluation process required by management for clinical educators involved in undergraduate preregistration education is discussed. Reliance on student feedback and clinical agencies' perceptions of the quality of teaching were seen as inadequate mechanisms for evaluation. The evaluation process adopted incorporated observation of the educators together with self-reflection on their performance. We conclude that post-briefings were poorly used and generally not reflective. Educators relied heavily on their clinical skills and used a limited range of teaching strategies. Whilst evaluation of clinical educators was time consuming and therefore costly, it is argued that it is essential to the integrity of the course. The evaluation process has provided direction for support and development of clinical educators within the context of the curriculum.
Wellard
S J
SJ
Deakin University School of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia.
Rolls
C
C
Ferguson
S
S
D004510:Education, Nursing, Diploma Programs; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000379:methods*; D005181:Faculty, Nursing / Q000592:standards*; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007587:Job Description; D012647:Self-Assessment; D014739:Victoria