A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximization test.
The guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) of Magnusson and Kligman was published in 1969. Since then, a vast body of practical experience with the test has been accumulated. New information requires that certain aspects of the procedure be re-evaluated, especially with regard to the interpretation of challenge results. In particular, awareness of the phenomenon of hyperirritable skin (the 'angry back' phenomenon) suggests that presently used controls are not always adequate and may overstate allergenicity owing to false-positive reactions. The control group should be exposed to a chemical insult at induction which provokes an inflammatory reaction comparable to the test substance. We present strategies to distinguish irritant from allergic responses. Allergic reactions should persist on rechallenge weeks later, while nonspecific irritant reactions generally fade and are irreproducible in particular animals. Finally, when a chemical is identified as a contact sensitizer in the GPMT, that result is simply a categorical statement of a theoretical hazard. An assessment of risk is necessary to estimate the relevance of the test result to usage in the real world.
Kligman
A M
AM
Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Basketter
D A
DA
D000485:Allergens; D000818:Animals; D017449:Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / Q000175:diagnosis; D017453:Dermatitis, Irritant / Q000175:diagnosis; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006168:Guinea Pigs; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012882:Skin Tests / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards
D000485:Allergens