title: Pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcomas: is it justified?
abstract: The role of pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas is examined by reviewing the recent (1978-1994) English language literature. There are no prospective studies that contain an appropriate control group, and only one retrospective study contains a matched control group. In those few studies that provide greater than 5-year survival data, the survival curve still has a steep slope and few patients are alive at 7 years. In most studies only one or two patients are at risk at 5 years or more. Projected survival is therefore statistically questionable. It is currently impossible to know what is the impact of the surgical procedure over and above the natural history (biology) of the tumor. A randomized, prospective study, as suggested a decade ago, is still needed. While there may be some merit to pulmonary metastasectomy in highly selected patients, aggressive pulmonary metastasectomy does not seem justified by the available data.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles Medical Center, California, USA.
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Frost
mesh_terms: D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000556:secondary* / Q000601:surgery*; D011379:Prognosis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012509:Sarcoma / Q000401:mortality / Q000556:secondary* / Q000601:surgery*; D012983:Soft Tissue Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D013908:Thoracotomy / Q000401:mortality