Revision total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty.
Forty-three patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty following either primary, medial unicondylar arthroplasty (23 patients) or valgus tibial osteotomy (20 patients) for medial compartment osteoarthritis were reviewed. Although the two groups had similar knee scores and range of motion at review, six patients (30%) who had undergone prior tibial osteotomy suffered serious postoperative complications. Of these, four patients had a deep infection. It was felt that several factors were responsible, resulting largely from difficulties in gaining access to the lateral tibial plateau and subsequently causing impairment of wound vascularity and healing. In contrast, those patients undergoing revision of unicondylar prostheses did not experience wound healing problems, but it was noted that in half of the cases, there was significant bone loss from the medial tibial plateau.
Jackson
M
M
Winford Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sarangi
P P
PP
Newman
J H
JH
D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008722:Methods; D010027:Osteotomy; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012086:Reoperation; D013977:Tibia / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome