Strategic compromise: real world ethics.
In this essay the Co-chair of Ethics Working Group 17 of the Health Care Task Force discusses the formation, organization processes and activities of the group, and provides an analysis and critique of the experience. It is suggested that the creation of the group and its inclusion in the process made a social statement which legitimized ethics as a significant part of public policy deliberations. At the same time, major questions are raised about the role of ethics in public policy arenas in which strategic compromise becomes the order of the day. Balanced and objective involvement may be illusory. Ethics, like informed consent, is a process, not an event and is ever evolving. Those who attempt to bring ethical considerations to the world of public policy have an obligation to think carefully about what should constitute an appropriate theoretical framework, make efforts to determine what is unique about ethics, and consider mechanisms for the various ethics disciplines to work effectively together. From this experience, the author developed a personal commitment to focus upon the critical importance of universal coverage for all Americans.
Secundy
M G
MG
Department of Community Health and Family Practice, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, D.C. 20059.
D026683:Advisory Committees; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D032921:Consensus; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000592:standards; D026822:Ethicists; D004989:Ethics; D035082:Federal Government; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000592:standards*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D024382:Professional Role; D011634:Public Health / Q000592:standards; D012945:Social Values; D028725:Theology; D014481:United States