title: Sampling for vaginal candidosis: how good is it?
abstract: In defined patient populations attending a genitourinary medicine department, screening for vaginal candidosis resulted in 26.3% positive rate. Microscopy using Gram-stained slide was useful in early diagnosis and resulted in the detection of 64.8% of symptomatic cases. Samples from the anterior fornix proved most sensitive for culture diagnosis while the left lateral vaginal wall proved least sensitive (positive predictive value 0.88 cf 0.81).
authors: Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Retford Hospital, UK.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Emmerson
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Gunputrao
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Hawkswell
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Dexter
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Sykes
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Searle
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Cross
authors: P M
authors: PM
authors: Nathan
mesh_terms: D002181:Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D008485:Medical Audit; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*