[Relation between research and practice in analytic psychotherapy].
The technique of psychoanalytic treatment as an objective, operative-technological theory inevitably experiences a subjective refraction on analyst's personality and his or her own cognitive and interactional styles influencing therapeutic efficiency. Systematic clinical trials of treatment data integrating motions from psychoanalytic, social and cognitive science, reconcile the gap between research and practice, between basic science and application. It will be discussed how empirical research can delineate therapists' cognitive and perceptual skills and the process of transformation from declarative to procedural knowledge, further elaborated in reciprocal connection with practice. The models of Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) and Cyclic Maladaptive Pattern (CMP) are especially considered. We will also discuss the consequences for training in psychoanalysis.
Tress
W
W
Klinischen Institut, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Hildenbrand
G
G
Junkert-Tress
B
B
Hartkamp
N
N
D003379:Countertransference; D003479:Curriculum; D006801:Humans; D010553:Personality Development; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011574:Psychoanalytic Theory; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy / Q000193:education / Q000379:methods*; D012106:Research; D012649:Self Concept; D014167:Transference, Psychology; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Zum Verhältnis von Forschung und Praxis in der analytischen Psychotherapie.