title: Survival after peranal and abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma.
abstract: The outcome of a consecutive series of 47 patients with rectal cancer treated by endoscopic transanal resection or peranal local excision was contrasted with that of 42 patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection. Surgery was considered curative for 35 and nine patients treated by abdominoperineal and peranal resection respectively (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing peranal excision were older than those treated by abdominoperineal resection (median 77 versus 69 years, P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of patients undergoing peranal resection was 24 per cent compared with 33 per cent for those treated by the abdominoperineal procedure (P < 0.005). When surgery was palliative the survival rate after both procedures was the same. Survival after peranal excision was significantly poorer than that after abdominoperineal resection but this may be acceptable when the stage of disease and age of the patients are taken into account.
authors: Department of Surgery, Battle Hospital, Reading, UK.
authors: A P
authors: AP
authors: Savage
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Reece-Smith
authors: R G
authors: RG
authors: Faber
mesh_terms: D000005:Abdomen / Q000601:surgery; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001003:Anal Canal / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010502:Perineum / Q000601:surgery; D011379:Prognosis; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality* / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013997:Time Factors