Metacarpophalangeal joint prostheses: a review of past and current designs.
The anatomy and biomechanics of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint are briefly described. Hinge, flexible and surface designs of past and current MCP prosthetic joints are reviewed, outlining their respective advantages and disadvantages. Although existing prostheses can restore cosmetic appearance and relieve pain, none can equal the stability and versatility of the natural joint. Delayed reconstructive surgery may be partly responsible for the mediocre results experienced, since the later the surgery the worse will be the condition of the muscles and ligaments surrounding the joint. These are the structures responsible for strength, movement and stability of the joint. From a mechanical viewpoint it may be desirable to operate at an earlier stage of the disease than is currently indicated, but this is a clinical decision. Some design aspects, namely fixation and wear, require a different approach when designing an MCP prosthesis from that adopted in the case of prosthetic hips and knees.
Beevers
D J
DJ
Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds.
Seedhom
B B
BB
D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D006801:Humans; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D008662:Metacarpophalangeal Joint / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000503:physiopathology; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology