title: [Non-therapeutic cone: surgical or conservative management?].
abstract: Histological reports of 94 conization specimens with margins' involvement were reviewed. Macroscopically and histologically features of cones and subsequent hysterectomy specimens are described, (N = 70). Patients parity (4.1 vs 2.9 births), cone's height (16.8 mm vs. 21.4 mm) and endo-or exocervical location of margins involvement were found to be statistically different between groups with and without residual disease at hysterectomy, (p < 0.01, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). No predictable index was found at multiple variable analyses.
authors: Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río.
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Schilling
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Le Cerf
authors: I
authors: I
authors: Rojas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001706:Biopsy / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy; D008875:Middle Aged; D010340:Pathology, Surgical; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D014626:Vaginal Smears; D002578:Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*
vernacular_title: Cono no terapéutico: manejo quirúrgico o conservador?.