On the contribution of a binocular 'AND' channel at contrast threshold.
Three experiments are reported in which an attempt was made to isolate the contribution of an AND channel by measuring aftereffects following alternating monocular adaptation. The first two were designed to test Wolf and Held's proposal that the binocular AND channel does not respond at contrast threshold. In the first experiment the relative sizes of monocular and binocular contrast threshold elevation were compared with the pattern of aftereffects obtained in a study of the suprathreshold tilt aftereffect. Identical patterns of results were obtained under the two adaptation conditions. In the second experiment, the monocular and binocular contrast-reduction aftereffect reported by Blakemore et al was measured over a wide range of reference contrasts. As in the previous experiment, the monocular effect was greater than the binocular effect. This occurred at all reference contrasts. These data support the conclusion that the AND channel contributes to visual performance in the same manner, irrespective of stimulus contrast. In the final experiment an alternative explanation for existing evidence against the existence of an AND channel was assessed.
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
L M
LM
Wilcox
B
B
Timney
M
M
Girash
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D003867:Depth Perception; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D005366:Figural Aftereffect; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011601:Psychophysics; D012016:Reference Values; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D015348:Vision, Binocular