Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periodontal pathology.
The diagnostic performance of the detailed narrow-beam (DNB) technique of the Scanora multimodal X-ray system was compared with periapical radiography for detecting periodontal pathology. In total, 253 sites in 133 patients were examined. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of both imaging modalities were analyzed in relation to the ratings of five observers for the whole dentition, three dental regions and five types of periodontal lesion. ROC analysis demonstrated that the overall diagnostic performance of DNB radiography was better (P < 0.05) than that of periapical radiography. DNB radiography was significantly superior (P < 0.01) for detecting marginal widening of periodontal membrane space, but there was no significant difference between the two techniques for crestal erosion, vertical bone loss, furcation involvement or calculus. The regional differences found in overall diagnostic performance of the two imaging modalities were not significant. The sensitivity for periapical radiography was 71% and for DNB radiography 85%, and the specificities 82% and 81% respectively. It is concluded that DNB radiography is a good radiographic examination for periodontal disease, and an acceptable alternative to periapical radiography.
Department of Oral Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Finland.
T
T
Tammisalo
K
K
Vähätalo
T
T
Luostarinen
R
R
Leimola-Virtanen
E H
EH
Tammisalo
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016301:Alveolar Bone Loss / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003728:Dental Calculus / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D010486:Periapical Tissue / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D010510:Periodontal Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D012372:ROC Curve; D011861:Radiography, Dental / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014056:Tomography, X-Ray; D014092:Tooth Root / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging