Stress analysis of different osseointegrated implants supporting a distal extension prosthesis.
Controversy exists when implants are used to restore distal extension in edentulous patients. Some have advocated the use of a rigidly connected implant to the natural abutment teeth and others have recommended the inclusion of a stress-breaking element. In this study, a comparison between these two approaches was done. With the technology of strain gauges, it was possible to record stresses under a rigid and a resilient implant system connected to a natural abutment with the same prosthesis under the same loading conditions. The results of this study showed that a resilient implant system was better for the abutment and the implant. This study provides a test method that will help dentists in choosing implants for their patients with predictable results.
Prosthodontics Department, Cairo University, Egypt.
H G
HG
el Charkawi
K A
KA
Zekry
M T
MT
el Wakad
D001732:Bite Force; D002126:Calcium Hydroxide; D002484:Cementation; D000044:Dental Abutments; D003722:Dental Alloys; D003738:Dental Cements; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D015921:Dental Implants; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D003779:Denture Design; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D008903:Minerals; D016348:Osseointegration; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014025:Titanium; D014070:Tooth / Q000502:physiology
D003722:Dental Alloys; D003738:Dental Cements; D015921:Dental Implants; D008903:Minerals; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; C025702:Dycal; D014025:Titanium; D002126:Calcium Hydroxide