General practitioners for rational use of drugs. Examples from Sweden.
In the south west region of Stockholm a group of 125 general practitioners (GPs) at 27 health centres asked about the extent to which the drug formulary of the University Hospital was useful in their practices. To answer this question, the GPs asked their local pharmacies for prescribing data. When presented this started a process towards rational prescribing from within the group of GPs, including repeated prescribing surveys, starting with health centres as the unit of analysis and proceeding to individual prescribing analyses on request by the GPs. As the prescribing data revealed major differences between health centres, the GPs arranged two workshops on drug use in primary health care. They developed a list of 167 recommended drugs based on drug statistics and morbidity in general practice. Signs of increased cost cautiousness could be shown. There was a clear trend towards both smaller volumes and cost per prescription item for the health centres in the study area. Compared to the national prescribing pattern, prescribing practice in the study area represented a 20 per cent lower drug cost. Although the GPs decided on a drug list separate from that of the hospital, collaboration between the Drug and Therapeutic Committee at the hospital and the GPs increased as a result of their increased engagement in drug management, thereby also bridging the gap between primary health care and clinical pharmacology.
Tomson
Y
Y
Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Wessling
A
A
Tomson
G
G
D011307:Drug Prescriptions / Q000191:economics; D004358:Drug Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005194:Family Practice; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D010594:Pharmacies / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010606:Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee; D010821:Physicians, Family; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D013548:Sweden