title: Misinformation revisited: new evidence on the suggestibility of memory.
abstract: In three experiments involving a total of 623 subjects, a series of slides was shown depicting a student in a college bookstore stealing a variety of items. Next, subjects read a narrative describing the event that contained some misinformation and some neutral information about several critical details. Finally, subjects took a memory test. On this test, subjects were asked to list exemplars of 20 specified categories but were instructed not to list any items that they saw in the slide sequence. Analogous to Lindsay's (1990) adaptation of Jacoby, Woloshyn, and Kelley's (1989) "logic-of-opposition" paradigm, the tendency to report suggested details was thus set in opposition to the ability to remember the source of those details. Therefore, we interpreted failure to include suggested details as exemplars as evidence that subjects believed those details had been present in the event. Analysis of subjects' responses under opposition instructions suggests that some misled subjects come to genuinely believe that they saw items that, in reality, were only suggested to them.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
authors.forename: K R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Weingardt
authors.forename: E F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Loftus
authors.forename: D S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Lindsay
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D013067:Speech Perception; D013404:Suggestion; D013800:Theft / Q000523:psychology*; D014796:Visual Perception