Anterior lumbar fusion: results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors.
One hundred and fifty-one patients underwent anterior interbody lumbar spinal fusion for intractable back pain. A solid bony fusion was obtained in 76%. The method of outcome assessment profoundly affected the results; whereas 68% of patients rated themselves as significantly improved by the procedure, only 40% achieved a good or excellent result on the more objective low-back outcome score. Patients who underwent a second procedure did not do well, and "salvage" surgery is not recommended. Posterior distraction instrumentation neither increased the rate of union nor improved the final results. The rate of fusion was influenced by the presence of a compensation claim. Compensation status and psychological disturbance at presentation were significant prognostic factors. Psychological disturbance at review had a profound effect on the outcome and patient satisfaction ratings. It is recommended that future studies employ a recognised outcome score and that the analysis specifically includes compensation status and psychological disturbance.
Greenough
C G
CG
Middlesbrough General Hospital, Cleveland, UK.
Taylor
L J
LJ
Fraser
R D
RD
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology / Q000601:surgery*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D010147:Pain Measurement; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011379:Prognosis; D012086:Reoperation; D013123:Spinal Fusion; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014942:Workers' Compensation