Brain-stem modulation of the response properties of cells in the cat's perigeniculate nucleus.
Transmission through the lateral geniculate nucleus is facilitated following activation of the cholinergic input from the brain stem, which is thought to reflect activity patterns seen during arousal. One of the underlying mechanisms is the suppression of inhibitory circuits local to the lateral geniculate nucleus. However, evidence exists that some visually driven inhibitory inputs to geniculate nucleus. preserved or even enhanced under conditions of arousal, and during electrical activation of the parabrachial region of the brain stem. We have therefore reexamined the effect of brain-stem activation on the visual responses of one group of local inhibitory inputs to geniculate relay cells, those emanating from the adjacent perigeniculate nucleus. We recorded single perigeniculate cells in anesthetized, paralyzed cats. Axons innervating the lateral geniculate and perigeniculate nuclei from the parabrachial region of the brain stem were electrically activated, and the effect of this activation was assessed on both spontaneous and visually evoked responses. Visual stimulation consisted of sinusoidally modulated sine-wave gratings of varying spatial and temporal frequency. For the great majority of perigeniculate cells (32 of 40), brain-stem activation inhibited spontaneous activity, while one cell was excited, three showed a mixed effect and four were unaffected. Nevertheless, the responses of most cells (30 of 40) were facilitated when brain-stem activation was paired with certain spatio-temporal patterns of visual stimulation. Spatial tuning curves were constructed for 17 cells and temporal tuning curves for 14, before and during parabrachial activation. The responses of any one cell could be facilitated, unchanged, or suppressed, depending on the visual stimulus used. In some cases, this substantially modified the cell's spatial and temporal tuning properties. We conclude that activation of the brain stem disinhibits geniculate relay cells in the absence of visual stimulation, but it has the potential to enhance either the magnitude or specificity of visually driven inhibition arising from the perigeniculate nucleus.
Murphy
P C
PC
Department of Neurobiology, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-5320.
Uhlrich
D J
DJ
Tamamaki
N
N
Sherman
S M
SM
D000818:Animals; D001933:Brain Stem / Q000502:physiology*; D002415:Cats; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005829:Geniculate Bodies / Q000502:physiology*; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology; D013788:Thalamus / Q000502:physiology; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology