title: Comparison of the mechanical performance of three types of unilateral, dynamizable external fixators. An experimental study.
abstract: Due to the increasing popularity of unilateral dynamizable external fixators for treating tibial shaft fractures, many new devices are being introduced onto the market. Especially in such half-frame fixators, the choice of any particular device depends above all on the stability of its construction. This study compares the biomechanical stability of three systems tested in axial compression, torsion, and both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral bending. In terms of the nondynamized phase, the AO/ASIF tubular fixator (as a one-plane, double-tube, unilateral frame) and the Martin Mono-Dynafix are, in general, less stable than the Orthofix fixator. After dynamization, the AO/ASIF system becomes particularly weak and offers low resistance especially to torque and any force that is perpendicular to the plane of assembly. The other two tested devices evinced much more stability; the Orthofix fixator seems superior to the Dynafix due to the different diameter of its screws.
authors.affiliation: Medical Center East, Department for Trauma Surgery, Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Jaskulka
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Egkher
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wielke
mesh_terms: D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004867:Equipment Design; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D016267:External Fixators; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D013978:Tibial Fractures / Q000601:surgery