title: Doctors on trial: a comparison of American and Jewish legal approaches to medical malpractice.
abstract: The recent and continual call for tort reform has many scholars proposing alternatives to current U.S. medical malpractice law. Most commentators limit their discussions to variations of the two Anglo Saxon theories of liability--negligence and strict liability. Little has been written examining the legal treatment of medical malpractice in other cultures. This article compares and contrasts Jewish and American medical malpractice law, examining both the contemporary and ancient sources of the law.
authors.affiliation: Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Fruchter
mesh_terms: D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007557:Israel; D007585:Jews / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010819:Physician's Role; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D014481:United States