title: Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study is to use daily electronic portal imaging to evaluate weekly port filming in detecting patient set-up position.
  
  
  METHODS
  A computer-based portal alignment method was used to quantify the field displacements on 191 digitized weekly port films and 848 daily electronic portal images in 21 radiation therapy patients. An electronic portal image data set as a control for actual daily treatment position was used to evaluate weekly port films with respect to same-day field displacement, rate of field placement error detection, and prediction of subsequent daily field displacements.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The field displacements measured on a port film frequently deviated from the corresponding field displacements on the electronic portal image obtained in the same treatment set-up. A linear regression analysis showed that the curves fitted to the same-day field displacements had slopes that differed significantly from unity (p < 0.001). Overall, the respective frequencies of field placement error, beyond clinical tolerance limits of 5, 7, and 10 mm (corresponding to head and neck, thoracic, and pelvic sites) for port filming and electronic portal imaging were 11% and 14% (p = 0.4) in the X-direction (lateral or anteroposterior) and 24% and 13% (p = .0001) in the Y-direction (caphalad-caudad). When the data were broken down by anatomical region, this discrepancy was found to be mainly due to the differences in the thorax, and head and neck image data sets. For thoracic fields, error in Y-shifts was 28% by port filming, but only 9% by portal imaging (p = 0.01). In the head and neck region, 18% of the port films exceeded tolerance, whereas only 6% of the electronic portal images did (p = 0.0001). Field displacements on the treatment set-ups between the acquisition of port films were not predicted by those films.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There are discrepancies between the field displacements and field placement errors detected by weekly port films and daily electronic portal images. This study suggests that improved methods of treatment verification may be necessary in modern radiation therapy.
authors.affiliation: Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Valicenti
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Michalski
authors.forename: W R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Bosch
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gerber
authors.forename: M V
authors.initials: MV
authors.lastname: Graham
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cheng
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Purdy
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Perez
mesh_terms: D003952:Diagnostic Imaging; D006801:Humans; D011187:Posture; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000379:methods*