Agency relationships in psychotherapy: an economic analysis.
This paper takes the economist's point of view for explaining why psychotherapy seems to be a particularly difficult discipline and what could be done about it. Whereas the so-called agency relationship (i.e. a specialized agent acting on behalf of an uninformed client) can be counted upon to resolve some of the problems in somatic care, it risks to fail in psychic care because the client frequently expresses inconsistent preferences. For this reason, family members and general practitioners may serve as comparatively good agents in ambulatory care, while in the inpatient segment of psychotherapy, patient-oriented objectives tend to be thwarted. An important condition for agency relationships to perform well, however, is that the client carry a sufficient 'price tag', implying that his treatment contributes to the economic objectives of the agent in charge. The conclusion is that choice of agency relationships, even if resulting in seemingly wasteful parallel treatment, gives rise to competition between agents for patients and thus may serve as one of the best safeguards of patients' interests in psychotherapy.
Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
P
P
Zweifel
D000553:Ambulatory Care; D003284:Contract Services / Q000191:economics*; D004465:Economic Competition; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D018803:Models, Economic; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D010358:Patient Participation; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000523:psychology; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000191:economics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D016896:Treatment Outcome