Calibration assessment in quantitative electroencephalographic brainmapping and evoked potential studies.
Acquisition of a Cadwell Spectrum 32 resulted in the introduction of quantitative electrophysiological brainmapping techniques in our neurophysiology laboratory. To ascertain the accuracy and consistency of our equipment, we performed the following tests: inputting a calibration signal and measuring the resultant amplitudes for quantitative electroencephalographs (qEEGs) and evoked potentials (EPs) in the mapping and standard montages, inputting a synchronous calibration signal and mapping it at varying times for qEEGs and EPs, as well as re-analysing the same electroencephalographic (EEG) epochs previously selected from 20 control subjects. QEEG amplitudes varied from -5.4% to +5.8% and EPs by 9.5% or less, and after an EP software upgrade, by 5.5% or less. QEEG voltage mapping showed variation of only one color increment across the map, which could, in our example, represent up to 25.2% of the scale used. Re-analysis of previously selected epochs yielded identical results. We have established some of the accuracy and consistency limits of the hard- and software of our system with respect to the quantitative and topographic data. We conclude that such systems need to be calibration-checked in the laboratories in which they are used, with an independent signal generator. Users also need to be aware that scaling of topographic maps could lead to erroneous conclusions, as perceived amplitude changes could affect the interpretation of both initial and serial studies.
Richards
A K
AK
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia.
Hamilton-Bruce
M A
MA
D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D002138:Calibration; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D012984:Software