Adverse drug reactions: physicians' opinions versus a causality assessment method.
Since spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions depends on the physician's opinion of the relationship between the drug and the adverse event, we compared physicians' opinions with the scores obtained by the causality assessment method used in France. During a 2 month period, all physicians who reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to our pharmacovigilance centre expressed their opinions on the causal link by means of visual analogue scales. ADR reports were then assessed with the French causality assessment method by a clinical pharmacologist who was blind to physicians' opinions. The assessment by both physicians and the standardized method was performed for 75 ADR cases involving 120 drugs. Physicians used a wide range of assessments, with a preponderance of extreme scores, resulting in a U-shaped distribution, while the standardized method gave generally low scores. Scores given by physicians were very high (causality considered very likely or likely) in 60% of cases and very low (causality considered unlikely or dubious/possible) in 32% of cases. Scores obtained using the causality assessment method were low (causality dubious/possible) in 89% of cases and causality considered likely in only 11 cases, essentially in cases with positive rechallenge. Complete agreement occurred in only 6% of cases. Adding complete agreement and minor discrepancies raised the percentage to 49%.
Centre de Pharmacovigilance, Hôpital Pellegrin, Université Bordeaux II, France.
G
G
Miremont
F
F
Haramburu
B
B
Bégaud
J C
JC
Péré
J
J
Dangoumau
D016907:Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D015984:Causality; D064420:Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; D005602:France; D006801:Humans; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires