Cost analysis of Hickman catheter insertion at bedside in gynecologic oncology patients.
BACKGROUND
Cost-containment issues are becoming increasingly important in medicine. The current study compares bedside versus operating room insertion of Hickman catheters from a cost and safety standpoint.


METHODS
A prospective chart review of all patients undergoing Hickman catheter insertion during the study period was performed to determine location of the procedure, rate of successful catheter placement, complications, and cost.


RESULTS
Ninety-six patients underwent placement of 108 Hickman catheters during a seven year period. Fifty-three catheters were inserted at bedside while 55 catheters were placed in the operating room. The complication rate was 8 percent for the bedside and 9 percent for the operating room group. Due to anesthesia standby, operating room time, and fluoroscopy, cost analysis revealed a substantial savings of $1,545 per patient if bedside insertion was utilized.


CONCLUSIONS
The data indicate that, in select patients, percutaneous insertion of Hickman catheters at bedside is a safe, cost-effective procedure.
Mannel
R S
RS
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Manetta
A
A
Hickman
R L
RL
Walker
J L
JL
Berman
M L
ML
DiSaia
P J
PJ
D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D006176:Gynecology / Q000191:economics* / Q000295:instrumentation; D006801:Humans; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000191:economics* / Q000295:instrumentation; D009873:Operating Rooms; D010362:Patients' Rooms; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012189:Retrospective Studies