title: Antiplatelet treatment for thromboprophylaxis: a step forward or backwards?
abstract: A recent meta-analysis from the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration recommended that antilatelet treatment either alone or, for greater effect, in addition to other proved forms of thromboprophylaxis should be considered for patients at high risk of thromboembolism. This paper argues that the current evidence does not justify the adoption of aspirin or other antiplatelet treatment for venous thromboprophylaxis, especially when more effective alternatives exist. Furthermore, several issues relating to this latest meta-analysis need to be debated.
authors.affiliation: Thrombosis Research Institute, London.
authors.forename: A T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Cohen
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Skinner
authors.forename: V V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Kakkar
mesh_terms: D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D010975:Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D013923:Thromboembolism / Q000517:prevention & control*
chemical_list: D010975:Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors