Dose-ranging study of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE
This randomized, multicenter, dose-finding study was undertaken to determine the dose of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) that can safely reduce neutropenia after cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CAVP-16) chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Secondary clinical end points included incidence of infection, intravenous (IV) antimicrobial use, and chemotherapy delivered.


METHODS
A total of 290 newly diagnosed SCLC patients were to receive six cycles of standard CAVP-16 chemotherapy on days 1 to 3 of every 21 days alone or with rhGM-CSF at 5, 10, or 20 micrograms/kg, administered subcutaneously (SC) on days 4 to 13 of each cycle.


RESULTS
In cycle 1, median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadirs were twofold to threefold higher in patients who received rhGM-CSF, although all values were less than 500/microliters, and recovery from neutropenia was faster at all rhGM-CSF dosages versus observation (P < or = .01). In cycle 2, 56% of all patients given rhGM-CSF received full chemotherapy dosages (87.5% to 112.5% of projected dose) versus 36% of observation patients. During days 5 to 21 of cycle 1, fewer patients who received 10 micrograms/kg of rhGM-CSF required antibiotics compared with observation patients (11% v 29%, P < or = .01). Adverse events that occurred more frequently in rhGM-CSF-treated patients included injection-site reaction, edema, asthenia, paresthesia, diarrhea, myalgia, musculoskeletal pain, Pruritus, and rash (P < or = .10). Fever occurred more frequently in the 10- and 20-micrograms/kg rhGM-CSF groups than in the observation groups. The incidence in the 5-microgram/kg group was comparable to that in observation patients. Patients who received rhGM-CSF had a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia.


CONCLUSIONS
rhGM-CSF at 5 to 10 micrograms/kg reduces chemotherapy-associated neutropenia and should be the dose range used in future studies.
Hamm
J
J
James G. Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, KY.
Schiller
J H
JH
Cuffie
C
C
Oken
M
M
Fisher
R I
RI
Shepherd
F
F
Kaiser
G
G
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000009:adverse effects*; D018288:Carcinoma, Small Cell / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D003520:Cyclophosphamide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004317:Doxorubicin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005047:Etoposide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005260:Female; D016178:Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D007239:Infections / Q000453:epidemiology; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009503:Neutropenia / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012074:Remission Induction; D016019:Survival Analysis
D005047:Etoposide; D004317:Doxorubicin; D016178:Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; D003520:Cyclophosphamide