title: Phototherapy for seasonal affective disorder: a blind comparison of three different schedules.
abstract: The authors investigated the outcome of an alternating time schedule versus two fixed schedules (either morning or evening) of bright light treatment for seasonal affective disorder. The subjects were 31 patients who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression with a seasonal pattern. No statistically significant difference was observed among patients in the three groups for response criteria after 1 week of treatment. These results support the use of more flexible phototherapy schedules.
authors.affiliation: Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lafer
authors.forename: G S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Sachs
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Labbate
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thibault
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Rosenbaum
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002940:Circadian Rhythm; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008027:Light; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010789:Phototherapy / Q000379:methods*; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D016574:Seasonal Affective Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D016896:Treatment Outcome