title: [Knife conization versus loop excision--clinical and histomorphologic results].
abstract: Ninety patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were randomly assigned to loop excision (n = 38) or cold-knife conization (n = 52). All specimens were well evaluable at histology. Compared with cold-knife conization, loop excision removes less healthy tissue without reducing the chances for cure.
authors.affiliation: Geburtshilflich-Gynäkologische, Universitätsklinik Graz, Osterreich.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Girardi
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Heydarfadai
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Koroschetz
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Pickel
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Winter
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000473:pathology; D004598:Electrosurgery / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D002578:Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*
vernacular_title: Messerkonisation versus Loop-Excision--klinische und histomorphologische Ergebnisse.