Surgical reporting instrument designed to improve outcome data in head and neck cancer trials.
Precise reporting of surgical staging and operative data in multi-institutional protocol studies could provide a number of benefits: 1) fewer cases would be discarded because of inadequate data, 2) staff review time would be reduced, 3) there would be assurance that participating surgeons were performing similar operations on similar tumors, 4) the resulting precision in stratification should improve the likelihood of achieving accurate comparison of the treatment options under study, and 5) by comparing the surgical parameters with local-regional control of disease, the specific factors that have a statistically significant correlation with outcome could be identified. This paper presents a computer-based, anatomically oriented reporting instrument that should improve the reliability of surgical data available to multi-institutional protocols.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
E A
EA
Weymuller
K
K
Ahmad
R R
RR
Casiano
D
D
Schuller
C B
CB
Scott
G
G
Laramore
M
M
al-Sarraf
J R
JR
Jacobs
D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D016347:Medical Records Systems, Computerized; D015337:Multicenter Studies as Topic; D009367:Neoplasm Staging