Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.
In three experiments, the effect of costs associated with responding on judgments of the causal effectiveness of the response was examined. In Experiment 1, the temporal interval between outcomes was matched on a variable interval (VI) and a variable ratio (VR) schedule. When each response was made at some "cost," and outcomes represented some "gain" for the subject, the rating of causal effectiveness for responses was higher on the VR than on the VI schedule. This relationship was absent when the outcome was a triangle flash. In Experiment 2, the number of responses required per outcome on a VI and a VR schedule were matched, and responses on the VR schedule were rated as more causally effective. In Experiment 3, a VI-to-VR yoking procedure was used. With minimal response costs, judgments were similar on the VI and VR schedules, but with greater response costs, responses performed on the VR schedule were rated as more causally effective than those emitted on the VI schedule.
Department of Psychology, University College London, U.K.
P
P
Reed
D000328:Adult; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013997:Time Factors