Blood will tell (won't it?): a century of molecular discourse in anthropological systematics.
Being derived from the hereditary material, molecular genetic data are often assumed to be a source of sounder inferences about evolution than data from other kinds of investigations. This, however, tends to be taken in the absence of a clear knowledge of the evolutionary processes at work, the technical shortcomings, and the manner of deriving the specific conclusions. The history of biological anthropology shows that, from the beginning of the 20th century, grossly naive conclusions have been promoted simply on the basis that they are derived from genetics, without having been fully thought-out. A balanced consideration of the shortcomings as well as the advantages of genetic data are necessary for its proper integration into the advantages of genetic data are necessary for its proper integration into the field. When molecular and morphological data disagree, both must be re-examined carefully, for genetics has been used irresponsibly as a form of scientific validation, both in American society and in American science. Contemporary data bearing on the molecular relationships of the apes are note-worthy for their diversity in quality, and need to be evaluated in the light of molecular and microevolutionary theory.
Marks
J
J
Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
D000818:Animals; D000885:Anthropology, Physical; D001789:Blood Group Antigens / Q000235:genetics*; D005826:Genetics, Medical; D015186:Hominidae / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009693:Nucleic Acid Hybridization; D010802:Phylogeny; D044469:Racial Groups / Q000235:genetics; D016415:Sequence Alignment
D001789:Blood Group Antigens