title: Traumatic anal incontinence. Role of unilateral gluteus maximus transposition supplementing and supporting direct anal sphincteroplasty.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study was designed to describe the surgical technique and discuss the possible beneficial role of unilateral gluteus maximus transposition supplementing and supporting a tensile-direct anal sphincteroplasty.
  
  
  METHODS
  Based on our experience with bilateral gluteus transposition, direct apposition of the remaining muscular ends combined with unilateral gluteus transposition (to avoid the tendency of the sphincter ends to separate) was undertaken in two patients with severe destruction of more than half of the anal muscular ring.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both postoperative courses were uneventful. Three months after colostomy closure, both patients were classified as Pescatori's B1.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As with any other combined surgical technique, the benefit derived may be attributed entirely to one of the procedures, but it is our impression that the gluteus transposition was worthwhile in achieving satisfactory repair.
authors.affiliation: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Department of Surgery, Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Enriquez-Navascues
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Devesa-Mugica
mesh_terms: D001003:Anal Canal / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery*; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000209:etiology* / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000601:surgery; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000379:methods*