title: Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.
abstract: Like most reform proposals, President Clinton's proposed Health Security Act offers universal access to care but does not significantly alter the nature of patients' legal rights to services. The act would create a system of delegated federal regulation in which the states would act like federal administrative agencies to carry out reform. To achieve uniform, universal coverage, the act would establish a form of mandatory health insurance, with federal law controlling the minimum services to which everyone would be entitled. Because there is no constitutionally protected right to health care and no independent constitutional standard for judging what insurance benefits are appropriate, the federal government would retain considerable freedom to decide what services would and would not be covered. If specific benefits are necessary for patients, they will have to be stated in the legislation that produces reform.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, Boston University, MA 02118-2394.
authors.forename: W K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Mariner
mesh_terms: D005161:Facility Regulation and Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D035082:Federal Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D037141:Mandatory Programs; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013219:State Government; D014481:United States