title: Comparisons among neo-Lurian assessment measures of brain-injured adults.
abstract: The performances of 49 brain-injured community college students (41% women; M age = 34.0 yr., SD = 13.6) on two neo-Lurian assessment batteries were investigated. Pearson correlations among the 11 clinical subtests of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery, Form I and 10 Planning, Attention, Simultaneous Processing, and Successive Processing (PASS) experimental tasks are reported. While the correlations were largely weak to moderate, a few interpretable trends in these relationships emerged. Over-all, the irregular and diffuse pattern of significant correlations may, in part, reflect the heterogeneity of the Luria-Nebraska battery's subscales. Implications for the cognitive assessment and remediation of patients with brain injuries are briefly discussed.
authors.affiliation: Northwest Missouri State University, Department of Psychology, Maryville 64468.
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Sink
authors.forename: D E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Harrington
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008182:Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010348:Patient Care Team; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results