title: Opinion polling and decision making: a critical appraisal of quality of life assessment.
abstract: The relationship between quality of life (QOL) assessments and decision making, in relation to the delivery of health services, is subjected to critical appraisal. Three levels of decision making in the health care system are taken into account in the analysis. Criticisms of opinion polling provide the basis for the appraisal. Examples of criticisms considered are: Might the use of QOL information be manipulative? Could the interviews or questionnaires used to obtain QOL data influence personal opinions? Are the methods used sometimes defective and/or superficial? Will QOL information always be used in decision making in ways that are ascertainable and justifiable? It is concluded that the time has come for the main focus of critical appraisal in QOL research to shift, from an emphasis on evaluation of the quality of methods used for assessments of QOL, toward an emphasis on the practical usefulness of QOL data.
authors.affiliation: Division of Epidemiology and Statistics, Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Sutherland
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Till
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D011639:Public Opinion; D011788:Quality of Life; D040841:Resource Allocation