Spatial working memory score of humans in a large radial maze, similar to published score of rats, implies capacity close to the magical number 7 +/- 22.
To compare the working memory (WM) capacity of humans to rats, we tested humans with a 17-arm radial maze and, in a follow up experiment, with a 13-arm radial maze. Both mazes were 15.2 meters in diameter, painted on a grassy field. In one version of the 13-arm experiment, we required a concurrent nonsense vocalization to impede subjects' use of language to remember locations. Subjects were instructed to choose arms of the radial maze unsystematically--as rats generally appear to do--and to visit the end of each arm only once. In additional procedures, we tested working memory capacity in a verbal task that is more analogous to the radial maze than is the typical ordered recall test. Subjects were asked to try to recite a sequence of 17 numbers (i.e., 18 through 34) or letters (A through Q) in unsystematic order, with no repeats. In another experiment subjects recited 13 numbers (14-26) or letters (A-M). In all tests, subjects were allowed only as many responses as there were distinct items (17 or 13, respectively). Average correct-response (nonrepeat) scores were 14.4 for the 17-arm maze and 14.1 for both of the verbal 17-item tests; these scores are close to the reported score for rats in a 17-arm radial maze. Average scores were between 10.8 and 11.4 in all of the 13-item maze and recitation tasks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Glassman
R B
RB
Department of Psychology, Lake Forest College, IL 60045.
Garvey
K J
KJ
Elkins
K M
KM
Kasal
K L
KL
Couillard
N L
NL
D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D013037:Spatial Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology