title: [Laparoscopic and conventional suture of perforated peptic ulcers--a comparison].
abstract: After the first successful laparoscopic closure of a perforated peptic ulcer in 1990, 13 consecutive patients with laparoscopic closure were compared to 8 previous patients with conventional surgery. The endpoints adverse advents (complications), pain intensity, fever, leucocytosis and hospital stay showed no clinically relevant differences. Consumption of analgesics was lower in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer is technically feasible. The safety of the method and the benefit for the patient need proof by a randomized controlled trial.
authors.affiliation: II. Chirurgischer Lehrstuhl, Universität zu Köln.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Eypasch
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Spangenberger
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ure
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mennigen
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Troidl
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002423:Cause of Death; D004381:Duodenal Ulcer / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000209:etiology; D010439:Peptic Ulcer Perforation / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D010538:Peritonitis / Q000601:surgery; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation; D013276:Stomach Ulcer / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D013536:Suture Techniques
vernacular_title: Laparoskopische und konventionelle Ubernähung perforierter peptischer Ulcera--eine Gegenüberstellung.