title: The possibility of ethical expertise.
abstract: Can we legitimately speak of ethics experts? Recent literature in philosophy and medical ethics addresses this important question but does not offer a satisfactory answer. Part of the problem is the absence of an examination of what it means to be an 'expert' in general. I therefore begin by reviewing my analysis of expertise which appeared earlier in this journal. We speak of two kinds of experts: persons whose expertise is in virtue of what they know ('epistemic' expertise), or what they do ('performative' expertise). Applying this analysis to the domain of ethics, I argue that we may speak of ethical expertise in three epistemic senses: a) expertise in descriptive ethics, b) expertise in metaethics, c) expertise in normative ethics, and in a performative sense: d) expertise in living a good life. I conclude with a brief description of some social roles of ethics experts.
authors.affiliation: Center for Health Ethics and Law, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-9022.
authors.forename: B D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Weinstein
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D028663:Ethical Theory; D026822:Ethicists; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011361:Professional Competence; D024382:Professional Role; D012106:Research; D012941:Social Responsibility