title: Effect of three different surgical prone positions on lung volumes in healthy volunteers.
abstract: Ten healthy volunteers were placed in three different surgical prone positions (knee-chest, Eschmann frame and two supports, one each for the thorax and pelvis); the normal prone position without any supports was used as a control. Lung volumes using helium dilution and spirometry were calculated for each volunteer in each position. Compared with the control position, functional residual capacity, expiratory reserve volume, residual volume and total lung capacity were significantly higher in the knee-chest position. Functional residual capacity and expiratory reserve volume were significantly higher in the frame position. No advantage was gained with the use of the two supports position. We conclude that, of these three prone positions in awake volunteers, the knee-chest position causes least respiratory restriction.
authors.affiliation: University Department of Anaesthesia, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
authors.forename: R P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Mahajan
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hennessy
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Aitkenhead
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Jellinek
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005105:Expiratory Reserve Volume / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005652:Functional Residual Capacity / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007320:Inspiratory Capacity / Q000502:physiology; D008168:Lung / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D016684:Prone Position / Q000502:physiology*; D012115:Residual Volume / Q000502:physiology; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative; D014109:Total Lung Capacity / Q000502:physiology; D014797:Vital Capacity / Q000502:physiology