title: Effects of dietary marine oil supplementation on reactivity of human buttock subcutaneous arteries and forearm veins in vitro.
abstract: 1. The vascular reactivity of resistance arteries isolated from gluteal skin biopsies and veins isolated from forearms of subjects fed marine oils were examined. 2. Twenty seven healthy adult males were randomly allocated to one of two different treatment groups. The first group received maxEPA (eicosapentaenoic acid 0.178 g g-1; docosahexaenoic acid 0.116 g g-1) capsules 10 g per day for 28 days while the second group received an equivalent amount of mixed oil placebo capsules. Biopsies were performed on day 29 (13 for gluteal sections; 14 for forearm vein biopsies). Subcutaneous arteries and veins were mounted in myographs and standard organ baths, respectively. 3. The internal diameter of the subcutaneous arteries at a calculated transmural pressure of 100 mmHg averaged 183.7 +/- 10.3 microns in the maxEPA group and 182.6 +/- 19.8 microns in the placebo controls. Arteries from subjects on maxEPA demonstrated increased sensitivity to angiotensin II (maxEPA vs placebo: -log EC50 (M) -8.36 +/- 0.18 vs -7.91 +/- 0.14) but not to noradrenaline or 5-hydroxytryptamine. Concentration-response curves to acetylcholine, substance P and sodium nitroprusside obtained for noradrenaline precontracted vessels were unaltered with marine oil treatment as was the concentration-response curve to calcium in K(+)-depolarized vessels. 4. Vein internal diameter at a calculated transmural pressure of 20 mmHg averaged 3.06 +/- 0.23 mm in the maxEPA group and 2.96 +/- 0.89 in the placebo group. Responses to noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine, angiotensin II and endothelin-1 were obtained in the absence and presence of indomethacin (1 microM) in veins from both maxEPA and placebo-treated subjects. Neither dietary supplementation with marine oils nor indomethacin had any effect on the responses obtained to these agonists.5. The major finding of the present study was that in general, maxEPA supplementation did not affect responses to various vasoactive substances on isolated subcutaneous arteries or forearm veins. An exception was the observation of an enhanced response to angiotensin II in subcutaneous resistance arteries studied in vitro. This effect was selective for angiotensin II and was not apparent in veins isolated from the forearm.
authors.affiliation: Alfred and Baker Medical Unit, Baker Medical Research Institute, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Chin
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Kaye
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Hurlston
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Angus
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Jennings
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Dart
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001158:Arteries / Q000187:drug effects*; D002081:Buttocks / Q000098:blood supply; D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism; D004032:Diet; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D015525:Fatty Acids, Omega-3 / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005542:Forearm / Q000098:blood supply; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008297:Male; D009131:Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D012039:Regional Blood Flow / Q000187:drug effects; D014655:Vascular Resistance / Q000187:drug effects; D014680:Veins / Q000187:drug effects*
chemical_list: D015525:Fatty Acids, Omega-3; D002118:Calcium