Comparison of standardized echography with magnetic resonance imaging to measure extraocular muscle size.
Using both standardized echography and high-resolution, surface coil magnetic resonance imaging, we measured the transverse diameter of recti extraocular muscles to evaluate comparative accuracy. Maximum transverse diameter of each rectus muscle in primary gaze was measured in 39 orbits of 20 subjects by using standardized A-scan echography. In the same orbits, we obtained multiple coronal magnetic resonance imaging planes by using a surface coil to span the anteroposterior extent of each orbit. Digital image analysis with the National Institutes of Health Image program was used to measure transverse muscle diameter. Average size for each rectus muscle was similar for the echographic and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. However, linear regressions of individual ultrasound against magnetic resonance imaging measurements showed coefficients of determination (R2) moderate (0.29) for inferior recti muscles and low (< or = 0.11) for other recti muscles. For most recti muscles, significant variability in echographic estimates of muscle width results from factors other than true muscle size. Results indicate that ultrasound measurements of muscle size in individual patients should be interpreted cautiously.
Demer
J L
JL
Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-7002.
Kerman
B M
BM
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000886:Anthropometry; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009801:Oculomotor Muscles / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D009915:Orbit; D012016:Reference Values; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods*