title: [A study of diagnostic scale in borderline personality disorder that was synthesis of symptomatic and personality structural element].
abstract: The diagnostic criteria for BPD such as the DSM-III(-R) and DCR, based on polythetic format for prototypal categories, has not always been able to result in accurate clinical diagnosis of BPD. Reasons posited for this were that DSM-III(-R) criteria consist of symptom items based on descriptive phenomenology, even for Axis II personality diagnosis, and that descriptions of the criteria were vague because of the standardization of vocabulary which aimed at improved inter-rater reliability. With the polythetic "yes/no" format, diagnosis was influenced by the determination of only one item; furthermore, different combinations of items yielding a heterogeneous membership might lead to the same diagnosis. It was, therefore, considered difficult to perform an accurate diagnosis of BPD in clinical practices using the existing general diagnostic criteria, and it was realized that the development of new diagnostic criteria for BPD was necessary. For those reasons, we generated a Clinical BPD Scale (CBS) as diagnostic evaluation scale of BPD with considering advantages for clinical use. This reconstituted some features of BPD which have been reported by many researchers, synthesizing symptomatic elements and personality structural elements. CBS is composed of four clusters, Two of these four clusters are evaluated by four grade anchor points which are provided for the rating of the severity of symptoms, and that are illustrated on the radarchart for comprehensive evaluation of the severity of the disorder. CBS was confirmed to have a high degree of validity, and achieved a satisfactory degree of inter-rater reliability by ANOVA ICC, and it has been found in application of CBS to several cases in the clinical practice that the degree of severity of each symptom could be clarified and differential diagnosis was possible with this diagnostic scale. Furthermore, the outcome of treatment could be confirmed at any time during the clinical follow up. In addition, through the dimensions, it is possible to grasp the severity, and further, through spectrum and hierarchy. We considered diagnostic area of BPD and its position by CBS correlating the other closely related disorders.
authors.affiliation: Mizoguchi Hospital.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nagura
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Maruta
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kato
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hongo
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hikiba
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Uchida
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Takahashi
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shimada
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mizoguchi
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Shimizu
mesh_terms: D001883:Borderline Personality Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006801:Humans; D010551:Personality; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Q000592:standards