Frontoethmoidal cephaloceles: transcranial and transfacial surgical treatment.
In the treatment of frontoethmoidal cephaloceles (FEC), three aims should be pursued: (1) to provide good exposure for a safe neurosurgical correction, (2) to obtain the best cosmetic result with minimal scarring, and (3) to inflict on the child the least surgical trauma. Between 1986 and 1991, 6 children were operated on in our unit for FEC. In this study, we compare the advantages of the transcranial surgical approach versus the transfacial surgical approach. Because most of the facial anomalies presented by these patients are represented by modifications in the position and shape of the medial orbital walls, as well as elongation of the nose, we feel more comfortable using the transcranial approach. It permits safer translocation of the medial orbital walls and recreation of the dorsum of the nose with a calvarial bone graft, and provides wide access for neurosurgical correction. In our experience, the most difficult part of the operation remains correction of the length of the nose. The transfacial approach, with planned skin resection, may thus represent an advantage in these cases. Therefore, our purpose is not to oppose these two surgical procedures, but often to combine them for safer treatment and better cosmetic results.
Forcada
M
M
Unité de Chirurgie Plastique et Reconstructive, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire de Gèneve, Switzerland.
Montandon
D
D
Rilliet
B
B
D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003399:Craniotomy / Q000379:methods*; D004677:Encephalocele / Q000601:surgery*; D005004:Ethmoid Bone / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005624:Frontal Bone / Q000601:surgery; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000002:abnormalities*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008588:Meningocele / Q000601:surgery*