A comparison of working postures of parcel sorters using three different working methods.
The postures of the trunk of eight parcel sorters were measured continuously under three different working conditions, during whole shifts. The working methods used were two different sorting tables and a hydraulic lifting platform on which the carts were to be placed. The question posed by the PTT-Post occupational health service was whether the latter method proved to be the better one with respect to the load on the musculoskeletal system. This study will help them to make a well-considered decision on which working method to choose for the new distribution centre in Rotterdam. The method used for measuring the working postures and movements of the trunk is the Portable Posture Registration Set (PPRS). This method was developed at the department of Biomedical Physics and Technology of the Erasmus University Rotterdam. While using the lifting platform, the subjects stood 8-11% more erect compared to the work at the sorting tables, thereby reducing the load on the lumbar spine. For this reason the lifting platform is preferred, although sagittal flexion of the back was somewhat more. It is stressed that the way in which sorters use the lifting platform is very important.
Derksen
J C
JC
Department of Biomedical Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Van Riel
M P
MP
Van Wingerden
J P
JP
Snijders
C J
CJ
D000328:Adult; D016552:Ergometry; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D009426:Netherlands; D005082:Physical Exertion / Q000502:physiology*; D011177:Postal Service; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*; D014937:Work / Q000502:physiology*