title: When similarity is a liability: effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and different-sex others.
abstract: In 2 laboratory studies, 145 male and female undergraduates were selected for the role of manager either on the basis of merit or preferentially on the basis of their sex. Results of the first study indicated that when female subjects had been selected preferentially as compared with on a merit basis, they reacted more negatively to female (but not to male) applicants for an entry-level position in terms of personnel evaluations and competence ratings and they recommended female applicants for hire less frequently and less enthusiastically. No differences in personnel evaluations were found as a result of preferential selection when subjects were male (Study 1) or when subjects were provided with favorable information about their ability (Study 2). Implications for implementation of affirmative action programs are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10063.
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Heilman
authors.forename: S R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Kaplow
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Amato
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Stathatos
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D004651:Employment; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010559:Personnel Management; D010560:Personnel Selection; D011361:Professional Competence; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits; D015983:Selection Bias; D012723:Sex; D000078329:Workforce