Can there be fair funding for fundholding practices?
Most regional health authorities set budgets for fundholding practices according to the amount of care used by the practice population. This article explains why this funding method can only lead to an inequitable allocation of resources between fundholding and non-fundholding practices. Using the experience of North West Thames region, the efforts made to make funding fairer are discussed. The steps that health authorities could take to investigate and reduce the problem are also outlined. In the absence of a capitation formula for funding fundholding practices, the paper suggests that health authorities should do much more to investigate the amount of money they spend on non-fundholding practices. Regions could develop and use other methods to set budgets rather than rely on activity recorded by practices. Regions and the Department of Health should resolve urgently if and how far the budgets for fundholders should be compensated for increases in provider prices.
Dixon
J
J
Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
D002017:Budgets; D005194:Family Practice / Q000191:economics*; D005380:Financing, Government; D005102:Health Expenditures; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006801:Humans; D012040:Regional Health Planning / Q000191:economics; D013222:State Medicine; D006113:United Kingdom