title: When is a serum iron really a serum iron? The status of serum iron measurements.
abstract: Although serum iron determinations play an important role in the diagnostic process, the accuracy of routine methods is suspect. The poor performance of currently used methods is well documented in the quarterly College of American Pathologists survey reports. Compared with the 1990 method of the International Committee for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH), the 1978 ICSH Reference Method shows a +3.4% bias and the standard method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards shows a -17.8% bias for iron results. All routine methods checked--DuPont aca, Abbott TDx, Kodak Ektachem (except one lot), BM/Hitachi 717, and Synermed--show a negative bias over the entire analytical range, a significant negative intercept, and extremely poor correlation with the 1990 ICSH method for iron values < 750 micrograms/L. Individual discrepancies of several hundred percent were observed. Imprecision of the methods is not the reason for these discrepancies. We question whether most routine methods measuring low iron concentrations provide results sufficiently reliable for confirmation of iron deficiency.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington 40536-0084.
authors.forename: N W
authors.initials: NW
authors.lastname: Tietz
authors.forename: A D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Rinker
authors.forename: S R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Morrison
mesh_terms: D001322:Autoanalysis; D015982:Bias; D002624:Chemistry, Clinical / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007501:Iron / Q000097:blood*; D000090463:Iron Deficiencies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
chemical_list: D007501:Iron