Traditional vs anchored instruction for diabetes-related nutritional knowledge, skills, and behavior.
This paper describes a nutrition education experiment in which traditional direct instruction was compared with a problem-solving method called anchored instruction (AI). Participants were 69 children ages 9 to 15 years, with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), who attended a diabetes camp. Following pretesting, campers were assigned to AI or direct instruction control classes. Posttests involved evaluating diabetes knowledge, personal meal plan knowledge, ability to choose an appropriate meal from a buffet line, and ability to pack appropriate meals for an overnight campout. AI and direct instruction both produced significant knowledge gains in this study. However, because the scores for the two groups did not differ, this study was unsuccessful in replicating results of other studies or extending the findings to selected measures of actual behavior.
Pichert
J W
JW
Smeltzer
C
C
Snyder
G M
GM
Gregory
R P
RP
Smeltzer
R
R
Kinzer
C K
CK
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D003922:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Q000178:diet therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D052756:Nutritional Sciences / Q000193:education*; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D011340:Problem Solving; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods