Variability of laboratory coat resistance to blood strikethrough.
Protection from contamination by potentially infectious fluids is an increasingly important aspect of hospital safety programs. Technical personnel in clinical laboratories may handle numerous samples of human blood and other fluids daily, and to protect themselves against exposure to bloodborne pathogens they routinely wear laboratory coats. We studied the effectiveness of six disposable (polypropylene; either spun-bond or spun-bond/melt-blown/spun-bond construction) and four reusable (polyester-cotton) laboratory coats in preventing blood passage. Fabrics (1018 samples) were tested at six time durations (1 s-5 min) and five pressures [1.7-13.8 kPa (0.25-2.0 psi)]. A standard spray test used to evaluate resistance to wetting showed that reusable coats were less repellent than disposables (P < 0.05). Pressure testing showed that reusable and spun-bond coats allowed greater blood passage than the spun-bond/melt-blown/spun-bond. Laboratory coats should be chosen that have sufficient resistance to blood or other body fluid passage for the task performed and for the period of time used.
Smith
J W
JW
Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112.
Muzik
A C
AC
Lovitt
S A
SA
Nichols
R L
RL
D001769:Blood; D017848:Blood-Borne Pathogens; D006801:Humans; D017758:Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / Q000517:prevention & control*; D007753:Laboratories; D011091:Polyesters; D011126:Polypropylenes; D011312:Pressure; D011481:Protective Clothing
D011091:Polyesters; D011126:Polypropylenes