title: Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate methods of parastomal hernia repair.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two tertiary care institutions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eighty patients undergoing 94 parastomal hernia repairs between 1983 and 1991.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three methods of repair were examined: fascial repair, stoma relocation, and fascial repair with prosthetic material.
  
  
  METHODS
  Parastomal hernia recurrence and short- and long-term complications.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-five (93%) of 59 living patients were available and examined at a median of 31.5 months following repair, providing 68 repairs for consideration. Fascial repair was used in 36 cases, stoma relocation in 25 cases, and fascial repair with prosthetic material in seven cases. Overall, 63% of patients developed a recurrent parastomal hernia and 63% had at least one postoperative complication. Following first-time repair, parastomal hernia recurrence developed in 22 (76%) of 29 patients who had fascial repair but in only six (33%) of 18 patients who had stoma relocation (P < .01). When repair was undertaken for recurrent parastomal hernia, fascial repair failed in all seven cases, stoma relocation failed in five (71%) of seven cases, and fascial repair with prosthetic material failed in one (33%) of three cases. The only factor that significantly affected the recurrence rate was the technique of repair. Complications were more common following stoma relocation (88%) than following fascial repair (50%) (P < .05). In particular, incisional hernias developed in 52% of patients following stoma relocation but in only 3% of patients following fascial repair. When postoperative occurrence of all abdominal-wall hernias was compared, there was no significant difference between the fascial repair group (29 [81%] of 36 repairs) and the stoma relocation group (17 [68%] of 25 repairs). Furthermore, the reoperation rate for hernia repair was nearly identical (31% vs 28%) between these two groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Parastomal hernia repair is often unsuccessful and rarely without complication. For first-time parastomal hernia repairs, stoma relocation is superior to fascial repair. For recurrent parastomal hernias, repair with prosthetic material is the most promising of a group of poor alternatives.
authors.affiliation: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Mass.
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Rubin
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Schoetz
authors.forename: J B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Matthews
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003125:Colostomy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D000071938:Fasciotomy; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006555:Hernia, Ventral / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007081:Ileostomy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D007813:Laparotomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012008:Recurrence; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013526:Surgical Mesh / Q000009:adverse effects; D013537:Sutures; D013997:Time Factors