title: When does "no" really mean "yes"? A case study in unilateral visual neglect.
abstract: A patient with unilateral visual neglect indicated whether a dot was or was not present in a display. When present, the dot appeared equally often in the left and right visual fields. Although he typically denied having seen dots in his left visual field, he was able to make this judgment much more quickly than when no dot was in fact present. The mean response times when the dot was present (1135 and 1004 msec, for left and right) were almost twice as fast as the response times when no dot was present (2025 msec). This result suggests that the patient searched the visual fields individually, and in fact generated a "No" response based on detecting the dot in his neglected field. Thus, the mechanisms used to detect stimuli apparently are not rigidly linked to those used to classify them or to produce a response.
authors.affiliation: Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, MA 02138.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Mijović-Prelec
authors.forename: L M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Shin
authors.forename: C F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Chabris
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Kosslyn
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000368:Aged; D001921:Brain / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006423:Hemianopsia / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014110:Touch; D014794:Visual Fields