title: [Comparative parasitological stool studies using the methods of Kato & Miura, Lawless, Heine and BIOSEPAR].
abstract: Twenty evidences of parasites were found in 152 stool-samples in comparison of parasitological stool-examinations according to Kato & Miura, Lawless, and Heine with the new diagnostic system BIOSEPAR. Advantages of the system BIOSEPAR: Recording of protozoans and helminths at the same time; not any contacts with samples of examination and reduction of risk of infection. Advantages of the other methods: Saving of material and time; evidence per slide also of smaller numbers of parasite stages; better chance to differentiate the stage of protozoans.
authors.affiliation: Landesuntersuchungsanstalt für das Gesundheits- und Veterinärwesen Sachsen, Standort Leipzig, Fachgebiet Medizinische Parasitologie und Schädlingskunde, Germany.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Krause
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D056890:Eukaryota / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D005243:Feces / Q000469:parasitology*; D006376:Helminths / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D006801:Humans; D010270:Parasite Egg Count / Q000379:methods*
vernacular_title: Vergleichende parasitologische Stuhluntersuchungen nach Kato & Miura, Lawless, Heine sowie nach BIOSEPAR.