title: Problem-solving in general practice.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To identify problem solving strategies in general practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three styles of scientific reasoning were defined and modelled on the medical environment. These models were tested in a simulated doctor-patient encounter.
  
  
  RESULTS
  According to the definitions contained in the models a deductive or hypotheticodeductive strategy could not be discovered. All participants used exclusively the inductive method and, more specifically, the speculative variant. This variant may be best described as a process of iterative pattern recognition.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The manifest utilization of the inductive method carries many implications among which are the irretraceability and irreproducibility of the process. The speculative form approaches the conception of art rather than science. This is exactly what most doctors try to tell: medicine is an art. The strategy allows for flexibility and quick response to the patient's needs.
authors.affiliation: Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Family Medicine, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ridderikhoff
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003663:Decision Trees; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005194:Family Practice / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D008487:Medical History Taking; D008875:Middle Aged; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011287:Prejudice; D011340:Problem Solving