title: [Are self-reported diseases reliable and plausible? Problems in the estimation of the prevalence of heart infarct using questionnaires data from the National Health Survey].
abstract: With the data of the German National Health Survey the question is discussed, if self-reports on diseases, gained in a survey, are useful for estimating prevalences within the German population. Self-reports on myocardial infarction serve as an example for examining the reliability and plausibility of such data. The prevalence rate for myocardial infarction in this survey is compared with prevalence rates of other data sources as the MONICA-register and surveys. Because these other data sources have some problems and deficits according to their validity too, the value of self-reports on diseases from the National Health Survey is seen positively for establishing a health reporting system.
authors.affiliation: Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Bonn.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bormann
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000453:epidemiology; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000453:epidemiology*; D015995:Prevalence; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
vernacular_title: Sind Selbstangaben zu Krankheiten zuverlässig und plausibel? Probleme bei der Abschätzung von Prävalenzen zum Herzinfarkt mit Hilfe der Fragebogendaten aus dem Nationalen Gesundheitssurvey.