Voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch nursing homes: are the requirements for prudent practice properly met?
OBJECTIVE
To acquire data about and an understanding of the way in which Dutch nursing home physicians (NHPs) who administer voluntary active euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) cope with the requirements for prudent practice. These requirements include: the patient must experience his or her suffering as unbearable and hopeless; the wish to die must be well considered and persistent; the request must be voluntary; the NHP must consult at least one other physician; the physician is not allowed to issue a certificate testifying to natural death and is obliged to keep records.


METHODS
See preceding paper.


RESULTS
Sixty-nine NHPs (12%) indicated that they had administered EAS on at least one occasion. The state of the patient was described by the NHP as utterly hopeless in 88% of cases and as utterly unbearable in 64% of the cases. The period of time between the first discussion of the subject and the actual administration varied from less than a day to more than a year. The most frequently given reasons for the request were unbearable suffering (53%) and hopeless suffering (49%). The majority of the NHPs (85%) indicated that it was the patient who first broached the subject of EAS. Eighty-five percent of the NHPs also requested a consultation with another physician. In the majority of cases this second opinion was given by another NHP (63%); over 50% of these NHPs worked in the same nursing home. Ninety-one percent of the physicians consulted were convinced that the request was well considered, and 93% found that there was no alternative treatment available. The nurses involved were consulted informally: 94% were questioned about the request for EAS and 93% about the physician's intention to comply. Seventy-five percent of the respondents said they had made some sort of written notes regarding the last time they had administered EAS. The number of certificates testifying to death by natural causes fell after 1988. In 41% of the cases all requirements were met.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study indicate that Dutch NHPs observe all the requirements for EAS in 41% of cases. In the remaining cases, shortcomings were found: NHPs allowed too little time between the first discussion and the actual administration; they did not always keep written records; or they signed a death certificate testifying that the patient had died a natural death.
Muller
M T
MT
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Nursing Home Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Van der Wal
G
G
van Eijk
J T
JT
Ribbe
M W
MW
D000328:Adult; D001293:Attitude to Death; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008499:Medical Records; D009426:Netherlands; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010819:Physician's Role; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012297:Right to Die; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000523:psychology*