title: [The determination of the mitral valve area after commissurotomy. A comparison of 2 echocardiographic methods].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the mitral valvular area obtained by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DMVA) to that obtained by Doppler through pressure half-time, (T1/2P) method (DMVA) in patients submitted to open or closed commissurotomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were obtained from 53 patients, 44 females and 9 males who ranged in age from 19 to 63 years (mean = 40.4 +/- 8) submitted to open commissurotomy (group A) or closed procedure (group F). The time from surgery to Echo ranged from 10 to 100 months (mean = 63 +/- 26). Ther were twenty one patients, in group A and 32 in group F.
  
  
  METHODS
  All the patients underwent two-dimensional echocardiography and continuous-wave doppler, guided by image and sound, so that the maximum velocity was located, using a Diasonics DRF 300 machine equipped with a combined echo-Doppler 3.5 mHz transducer. The mitral valve was visualized in short axis view the 2D mitral valve area was measured as the planimetered area along the inner border of the smallest orifice, while scanning through the short axis. Continuous-wave Doppler recordings were performed at 50 mm/s. The pressure half-time was measured as the interval between maximum velocity and maximum velocity/1.4. The valvular area (DMVA) was obtained by the expression 220/T1/2p. Maximum velocity (VMax) of mitral flux and the prevalence of significant mitral regurgitation (> = 2) were also compared in groups A and F. The relationship between 2DMVA and DMVA were compared by simple linear regression analysis and the other parameters by the t test and by chi-squared analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  2DMVA in the total patients was 2.26 +/- 0.59 and the DMVA 2.31 +/- 0.76 (NS). There were no significant difference between groups A e F concerning: VMax = 162.48 +/- 28.15 and 150.09 +/- 30.08, DMVA = 2.34 +/- 0.75 and 2.29 +/- 0.76 respectively, and mitral regurgitation = 2 patients in both groups. The correlation between the Doppler and the 2D obtained areas was good in group A r = 0.76 SEE there were no correlation between these values in group F r = 0.33.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We can conclude that the mitral valvular area obtained by two-dimensional echocardiography, correlates to the Doppler mitral valvular area in patients with prior open commissurotomy proving the complementary role of the two methods.
authors.affiliation: Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Cruz.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Canada
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Calqueiro
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ventosa
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Andrade
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Martins
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gouveia
authors.forename: R S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Gomes
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004452:Echocardiography / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015150:Echocardiography, Doppler / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008943:Mitral Valve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D011184:Postoperative Period
vernacular_title: Determinação da área valvular mitral após comissurotomia. Comparação de dois métodos ecocardiográficos.