Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods.
The power to detect linkage for likelihood and nonparametric (Haseman-Elston, affected-sib-pair, and affected-pedigree-member) methods is compared for the case of a common, dichotomous trait resulting from the segregation of two loci. Pedigree data for several two-locus epistatic and heterogeneity models have been simulated, with one of the loci linked to a marker locus. Replicate samples of 20 three-generation pedigrees (16 individuals/pedigree) were simulated and then ascertained for having at least 6 affected individuals. The power of linkage detection calculated under the correct two-locus model is only slightly higher than that under a single locus model with reduced penetrance. As expected, the nonparametric linkage methods have somewhat lower power than does the lod-score method, the difference depending on the mode of transmission of the linked locus. Thus, for many pedigree linkage studies, the lod-score method will have the best power. However, this conclusion depends on how many times the lod score will be calculated for a given marker. The Haseman-Elston method would likely be preferable to calculating lod scores under a large number of genetic models (i.e., varying both the mode of transmission and the penetrances), since such an analysis requires an increase in the critical value of the lod criterion. The power of the affected-pedigree-member method is lower than the other methods, which can be shown to be largely due to the fact that marker genotypes for unaffected individuals are not used.
Goldin
L R
LR
Clinical Neurogenetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Weeks
D E
DE
D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005260:Female; D030342:Genetic Diseases, Inborn / Q000235:genetics*; D008040:Genetic Linkage; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008126:Lod Score; D008297:Male; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010375:Pedigree