Videoimaging: the pros and cons.
I have tried to make some thoughtful points based on a fair amount of experience in the use of videoimaging, both in research and clinical application. The technical development of computerized videoimaging has progressed greatly in the past several years, in response to the profession's interest in it. While many orthodontists have become interested in this technology because of its potential in communication and marketing, I feel its greatest potential lies in the area of diagnosis and treatment planning. The use of integrated and facial images has allowed me to visualize the face (primarily in profile, although the frontal view can be useful when evaluated and manipulated properly) and recognize particular aspects and patterns of treatment options I had not recognized before (Figures 4-6). Obviously, a great deal of research must be done in the future before we can completely integrate this technology into our treatment of patients. These studies are just beginning. I feel confident that computerized videoimaging will help expand our vision as we strive to deliver the best care possible; nevertheless, we must evaluate this technology rationally and define its strengths and weaknesses just as clearly as we have for our cephalometric tools.
Sarver
D M
DM
Department of Orthodontics, University of Alabama School of Dentistry.
D003142:Communication; D003199:Computer Systems; D003812:Dentist-Patient Relations; D004955:Esthetics, Dental; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000628:therapy*; D008318:Malpractice; D009971:Orthodontics, Corrective; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D012984:Software; D014741:Video Recording