title: Rats avoid exposure to HVdc electric fields: a dose response study.
abstract: Rats, given the choice, avoid exposure to alternating current (ac) 60-Hz electric fields at intensities > or = 75 kV/m. This study investigated the generality of this behavior by studying the response of rats when exposed to high voltage direct current (HVdc) electric fields. Three hundred eighty male Long Evans rats were studied in 9 experiments with 40 rats per experiment and in one experiment with 20 rats to determine 1) if rats avoid exposure to HVdc electric fields of varying field strengths, and 2) if avoidance did occur, what role, if any, the concentration of air ions would have on the avoidance behavior. In all experiments a three-compartment glass shuttlebox was used; either the left or right compartment could be exposed to a combination of HVdc electric fields and air ions while the other compartment remained sham-exposed. The third, center compartment was a transition zone between exposure and sham-exposure. In each experiment, the rats were individually assessed in 1-h sessions where half of the rats (n = 20) had the choice to locomote between the two sides being exposed or sham-exposed, while the other half of the rats (n = 20) were sham-exposed regardless of their location, except in one experiment where there was no sham-exposed group. The exposure levels for the first six experiments were 80, 55, 42.5, 30, -36, and -55 kV/m, respectively. The air ion concentration was constant at 1.4 x 10(6) ions/cc for the four positive exposure levels and -1.4 x 10(6) ions/cc for the two negative exposure levels. Rats having a choice between exposure and non-exposure relative to always sham-exposed control animals significantly reduced the amount of time spent on the exposed side at 80 kV/m (P < .002) as they did at both 55 and -55 kV/m (P < .005). No significant differences between groups were observed at 42.5, 30, or -36 kV/m. To determine what role the air ion concentration might have had on the avoidance behavior at field strengths of 55 kV/m or greater, four additional experiments were conducted. The HVdc exposure level was held constant at either -55 kV/m (for three experiments) or -55 kV/m (for 1 experiment) while the air ion concentration was varied between experiments at 2.5 x 10(5) ions/cc, 1.0 x 10(4) for two of the experiments and was below the measurement limit (< +/- 2 x 10(3) ions/cc) for the other two experiments at 55 and -55 kV/m.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
authors.affiliation: Biology and Chemistry Department, Life Sciences Center, Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington 99352.
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Creim
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Lovely
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Weigel
authors.forename: W C
authors.initials: WC
authors.lastname: Forsythe
authors.forename: L E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Anderson
mesh_terms: D000390:Air Ionization; D000818:Animals; D001362:Avoidance Learning; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000528:radiation effects*; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D004574:Electromagnetic Fields / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats