Family screening for genetic haemochromatosis. What is the most effective method of contact?
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of various approaches to follow-up screening of family members after genetic haemochromatosis (GH) has been diagnosed in an individual.


METHODS
Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with GH at the Flinders Medical Centre and Repatriation General Hospital in South Australia over a 16-year period were identified by review of case notes. If possible, a questionnaire and a follow-up interview were used to obtain information about the screening that had been done and any obstacles to screening that were encountered. Patients were asked to outline a family tree, and indicate who had and who had not been screened and reasons for not screening. EVALUATION CRITERION: The number of relatives screened or not screened.


RESULTS
The families of 71% of patients diagnosed with haemochromatosis were subject to some degree of screening, although complete screening was achieved in only 13%. Approximately a third (30%) of our GH patients were detected by family screening. However, not all relatives who were at risk were screened. Reasons given for not screening were, for example, ignorance about "genetic disease" and fear of treatment.


CONCLUSIONS
Family screening is an important means of detecting new cases of GH. If these findings reflect practice elsewhere, there is a need for education of medical practitioners regarding those who should be screened. More easily accessible information for patients with GH and their relatives would help to overcome some of the problems surrounding identification of the disease.
Clayton
C
C
Flinders University School of Medicine, Bedford Park, SA.
Hall
P
P
Mackinnon
M
M
D001290:Attitude; D005190:Family; D005820:Genetic Testing; D006432:Hemochromatosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires