title: Two ceramic materials compared for the production of CEREC inlays.
abstract: Two ceramic materials, MGC Dicor and Vitablocs Mark II, were compared in vitro for the quality of fit of CEREC inlay restorations. The inlays made from Vitablocs Mark II fitted the inlay preparation significantly better than those made from MGC Dicor.
authors.affiliation: Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, UK.
authors.forename: A C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Shearer
authors.forename: H O
authors.initials: HO
authors.lastname: Heymann
authors.forename: N H
authors.initials: NH
authors.lastname: Wilson
mesh_terms: D002516:Ceramics; D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D006801:Humans; D007284:Inlays / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D017755:Prosthesis Fitting; D013499:Surface Properties
chemical_list: C047475:Dicor ceramic; C082340:Vita Mark II; D003776:Dental Porcelain; C074543:Cerec