A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers.
A parallel evaluation was performed on four automated hematology analyzers: the Celldyn 3000 (Unipath Corp., Mountain View, CA), the Coulter STKS (Coulter Electronics Inc., Hialeah, FL), the Sysmex NE-8000 (Baxter Healthcare Corp., McGaw Park, IL), and the Technicon H*2 (Miles Corp., Tarrytown, NY). The protocol included evaluation of the complete blood count and differential leukocyte count (DLC) parameters. The DLC evaluation was performed using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Studies H20-A protocol. Based on this evaluation, the authors could not identify a single instrument that was clearly superior to the others. Overall, the four instruments were found to be safe and effective for diagnostic use; however, there were areas in which their performance was less than optimal. Particular questions were raised regarding the clinical usefulness of instrumental "flags" to identify qualitative leukocyte abnormalities. The results are discussed in relation to the selection of instruments for specific clinical applications.
Bentley
S A
SA
Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Johnson
A
A
Bishop
C A
CA
D001772:Blood Cell Count / Q000295:instrumentation; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000295:instrumentation; D006405:Hematology / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D007958:Leukocyte Count / Q000295:instrumentation; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012984:Software