How teachers define and respond to child abuse: the distinction between theoretical and reportable cases.
Teachers are considered to be among those who are well-placed for the detection and prevention of child abuse. Yet little attention has been given to the definitions teachers use in deciding which cases to process. The paper draws on a larger study of Ontario women teachers. Information from 264 elementary teachers and 47 principals was collected in three phases: exploratory interviews, a survey, and focused interviews. A key part of the survey involved 10 vignettes designed to determine how teachers define abuse, how much experience they have had in dealing with such situations, and what action they took in each case. The findings demonstrated that teachers included a broad range of behaviors in their own "theoretical" definitions, but preferred informal intervention over formal reporting. Although there is no statistical relationship between definitions and reporting, it seems clear that the decision to report involves the interplay of definitions, institutional response, and teachers' experiences with a range of reactions and personal trials. Reporting is also complicated by teachers' disciplinary role, by their concerns for establishing reasonable grounds, and by the perception that some cases can be handled more effectively by the school, without the intervention of Child Protection Services (CPS).
Tite
R
R
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002649:Child Abuse / Q000145:classification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control; D002651:Child Advocacy; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D010465:Perception; D013663:Teaching