title: Comparison by means of a computer-supported device of the enlarging characteristics of two different instruments.
abstract: Numerous studies report different results when testing endodontic instruments with similar and/or different research protocols. However, objective studies that could eliminate the factors inherent to the operator have not yet been developed. Simulated root canals in clear casting resin were used as models. The Canal Master U and Flexogate were tested by using a double exposure photographic technique. A computer-aided device capable of reproducing three-dimensional enlarging movements and irrigation of the simulated canals was developed. The enlarging movements were programmed according to the step-back and step-down techniques. The enlarging of simulated root canals with this device proved to be constant and reproducible. Standard deviations were kept low and were dependent on the degree of canal curvature. The enlarged simulated root canals showed that both instruments could be kept centered in the path of the root canal. Results showed only a few significant differences between the effective material removed and a theoretical ideal amount of removed material.
authors.affiliation: Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Munich, Germany.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Briseño
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kremers
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hamm
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Nitsch
mesh_terms: D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012390:Root Canal Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013813:Therapy, Computer-Assisted