title: Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty.
abstract: We reviewed 19 revision hip arthroplasties in which the new femoral component had been recemented into the old, intact cement mantle. The mean time from the first operation to revision was 64 months and the average follow-up was 59 months. There were 7 excellent, 11 good, and one fair result. No femoral component had been revised for loosening and all the stems appeared radiographically stable. Complications included intraoperative perforation of the femur on two occasions and one dislocation. The use of the cement-within-cement technique requires that the old cement surface be dry and roughened to increase the surface area and that the cement be injected in the liquid phase to prevent lamination. The indications for this technique include a broken stem with an intact distal cement mantle, the removal of a femoral component for revision of a loose cup to improve exposure and/or increase offset, recurrent dislocation secondary to component malposition, and debonding of the femoral component within an intact cement mantle.
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York.
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Lieberman
authors.forename: B H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Moeckel
authors.forename: B G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: E A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Salvati
authors.forename: C S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Ranawat
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001843:Bone Cements; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012008:Recurrence; D012086:Reoperation; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D001843:Bone Cements