title: [Phlebography of the leg veins. Study quality and sources of error].
abstract: In a retrospective study, 198 contrast venographies were evaluated by two blinded observers for quality of opacification of the venous system and quality of documentation. There was good correlation between the two observers in 91% of the cases. They found an adequate contrast quality in 183 cases (92.4%), while in 15 cases (7.6%) incomplete contrast was found in some parts of the calf or pelvic veins. Most venograms (195, or 98.5%) were adequately documented. In conclusion, contrast venography is an excellent method for evaluation of the venous system, if performed adequately. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement of both technique and documentation.
authors.affiliation: Ludwig Boltzmann-Institut für radiologisch-physikalische Tumordiagnostik, Universitätsklinik für Radioldiagnostik, Wien.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Baldt
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Zontsich
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wiesmayr
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bankier
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Breitenseher
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hübsch
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010690:Phlebography / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014648:Varicose Veins / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*
vernacular_title: Phlebographie der Beinvenen. Untersuchungsqualität und Fehlerquellen.