title: Effects of dentin permeability and hydration on the bond strengths of dentin bonding systems.
abstract: This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strengths of five adhesive systems bonded to dentin with and without simulated physiologic hydrostatic pressure. To simulate pulpal pressure, bonding procedures were done on extracted teeth connected to a hydration apparatus. Bond strengths were significantly less for each adhesive system under simulated physiologic conditions. Amalgambond had significantly higher bond strengths than Clearfil Photo Bond, Gluma, Scotchbond 2, or Tenure, either with or without simulated pulpal pressure.
authors.affiliation: Dept. of Operative Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Elhabashy
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Swift
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Boyer
authors.forename: G E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Denehy
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003782:Dental Pulp / Q000503:physiopathology; D003806:Dentin Permeability; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D005976:Glutaral; D006801:Humans; D006874:Hydrostatic Pressure; D008422:Materials Testing; D008689:Methacrylates; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D019279:Resin Cements; D013718:Tensile Strength
chemical_list: C070606:Amalgambond; D003188:Composite Resins; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D008689:Methacrylates; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D019279:Resin Cements; C074669:Clearfil Photo Bond; C067788:scotchbond 2; C074811:Tenure adhesive; C044372:Gluma; D005976:Glutaral