Handling characteristics of gallium alloy for dental restoration.
The handling characteristics of a gallium alloy (Gallium Alloy GF) were compared to those of a spherical high-copper amalgam (Tytin). Ten dentists each restored four identical MO preparations in acrylic typodont teeth (no. 30), two with amalgam and two with gallium alloy. Each restoration was evaluated immediately following completion by the operator for six clinically relevant criteria. Each criterion was scored between 1 and 5, where 1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = good, and 5 = very good. Three two-sided Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the median scores for significant differences (P < 0.05). The first test indicated no significant difference between scores for the first- and second-placed restorations, within criteria and within alloy type (n = 10). The second test indicated a significant difference between amalgam and gallium alloy, within criteria and within restoration sequence (n = 10), for each criterion except resistance to fracture during removal of the matrix band. The third test indicated a significant difference between amalgam and gallium alloy, within each criteria, combining scores for first- and second-placed restorations (n = 20). During simulated clinical placement, amalgam was rated significantly higher than gallium alloy in each handling characteristic evaluated.
Mash
L K
LK
Department of Restorative Sciences, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas 75246.
Miller
B H
BH
Nakajima
H
H
Collard
S M
SM
Guo
I Y
IY
Okabe
T
T
D003722:Dental Alloys; D003723:Dental Amalgam; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005708:Gallium; D008422:Materials Testing
D003722:Dental Alloys; C036886:tytin; D003723:Dental Amalgam; D005708:Gallium