Consultant opinion on orthodontic treatment plans used by dental practitioners: a pilot study.
Prior to 1987, dental practitioners in England and Wales intending to carry out all but the simplest orthodontic treatment within the National Health Service, were required to submit pretreatment study models, details of the orthodontic assessment and the proposed treatment plan to the Dental Estimates Board prior to starting treatment. Models taken at the end of treatment were required by the Board to enable payment to be made. In this pilot study, the acceptability of orthodontic treatment plans used by practitioners working in the General Dental Services was assessed by eight hospital consultants, using information about 40 cases submitted to the Dental Estimates Board in 1987/88. All consultants considered a high proportion of plans to be unacceptable, but agreement between the consultants was variable and some agreed with one another on very few plans. A single scorer used the weighted PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index to assess the degree of departure from normal occlusion of both pre- and post-treatment models. Using accepted standards, only nine cases were greatly improved (PAR reduction > 70%) and the mean percentage reduction in PAR score was low. Consultant opinion on the appropriateness of treatment planning was not related to the outcome of orthodontic treatment.
Stephens
C D
CD
Department of Child Dental Health, University of Bristol Dental School, UK.
Drage
K J
KJ
Richmond
S
S
Shaw
W C
WC
Roberts
C T
CT
Andrews
M
M
D002983:Clinical Competence; D003253:Consultants; D005792:General Practice, Dental / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D003765:Models, Dental; D015588:Observer Variation; D009971:Orthodontics, Corrective / Q000592:standards*; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D010380:Peer Review; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D006113:United Kingdom