Spatial localization of motion-defined and luminance-defined contours.
Thresholds for the vernier alignment of contours defined by luminance and coherent random-dot motion were measured. The luminance-defined contours were localized with a precision better than the receptor grain, while the motion-defined contours were localized more poorly than this limit. When motion-defined and luminance-defined targets were matched for dot density, vernier thresholds were equivalent at low densities. When the targets were also equated for perceived contrast, the vernier thresholds became equivalent at higher densities as well. These results suggest that the precision with which motion-defined contours are localized is contrast and sample limited. Next, the localization mechanism for motion-defined targets was investigated. Length summation limits were similar for motion-defined and luminance-defined targets, suggesting that these targets could be localized by a common mechanism. Vernier targets were then flanked by two additional bars. Motion-defined flanks interfered with the localization of motion-defined targets and luminance-defined flanks interfered with the localization of luminance-defined targets. However, motion-defined and luminance-defined bars did not interact to produce spatial interference. This result indicates that the mechanisms for localizing luminance-defined and motion-defined targets are independent. We suggest that parallel mechanisms govern the vernier localization of motion-defined and luminance-defined targets.
Banton
T
T
College of Optometry, University of Houston, TX 77204-6052.
Levi
D M
DM
D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008027:Light; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology; D012858:Size Perception / Q000502:physiology; D013053:Spectrophotometry