Academic nurse leaders' interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses--Part 1.
The purpose of this study was to establish whether there is agreement among academic nurse leaders in their interpretation of aspects and criteria related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses. The Delphi technique was selected as the most appropriate method of data-collection for this type of study. The target population identified for this study consisted of the Heads of Nursing Departments or their delegates from the 18 universities of the four provinces of the RSA, self-governing and independent states of Southern Africa and Namibia, which offer nursing degrees. Three rounds of questionnaires were sent to all heads of the 18 identified nursing departments. Participation was poor (nine participated in first round, nine in second the third round, no further rounds of questionnaires were sent due to the waning interest and poor participation. Many divergent responses were received to most of the aspects included in the study. This indicates that with a few exceptions there is little or no agreement among academic nurse leaders in their interpretation of aspects and criteria relating to the examination of post-graduate scientific or academic treatises.
Brink
H
H
D004212:Academic Dissertations as Topic; D000288:Administrative Personnel; D003697:Delphi Technique; D004511:Education, Nursing, Graduate; D006801:Humans; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D012579:Schools, Nursing; D013019:South Africa; D014495:Universities; D014956:Writing