title: A comparison of four commercial systems used to measure whole-body electrical impedance.
abstract: Four commercial whole-body impedance measuring systems (Holtain, RJL, Bodystat and EZcomp) were compared on two separate occasions for a group of normal subjects. The first set of readings in 21 subjects demonstrated a significant difference of approximately 6% between the Holtain measurement and the higher readings from the Bodystat or RJL systems. The differences between the RJL and Bodystat readings were much less (mean difference 0.6%). Similar differences between the Holtain and EZcomp or Bodystat measurements were demonstrated on a second occasion for a group of 11 subjects. Given that these devices operate by supplying a constant current, the differences may be explained by the results from a series of measurements on a whole-body resistance simulator in which it appears that for skin contact resistance > 200 omega the Holtain device is unable to sustain a constant current and therefore records a lower impedance than the true value.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Physics, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
authors.forename: S W
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Smye
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sutcliffe
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Pitt
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001823:Body Composition; D017097:Electric Impedance; D004864:Equipment and Supplies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013677:Medical Laboratory Science; D008875:Middle Aged; D012016:Reference Values