A standard procedure for measuring pellet hardness of rodent diets.
A Chatillon Model TCM-200 test stand with exchangeable flat horizontal or concave receptacle bases and a DFI-200 gauge load cell with multiple types of upper exchangeable test jaws (large round-flat, medium round-flat, chisel, bullet, and cone-shaped) were compared by using preautoclaved and autoclaved NIH-31 rodent diet pellets to determine which type of hardness testing system would give the most accurate and reproducible results for measuring pellet hardness. The type and size of the contact area of the upper jaws significantly affected the force required to break the pellets. Significant differences were observed between the flat-horizontal and concave receptacle bases in the force required to break the pellets when using the two round-flat upper jaws. In contrast, similar results were obtained with both bases when the bullet, chisel, or cone-shaped upper jaws were used. Autoclaved pellets were 69.4% (range, 49 to 94%) harder than preautoclaved pellets. These results suggest that different testing systems can be used for measuring pellet hardness and that a standard procedure must be used in order to compare pellet hardness results between different testing laboratories. It was concluded that the flat-horizontal base and the larger round-flat end upper jaw gave the most reproducible results for measuring pellet hardness.
Thigpen
J E
JE
Comparative Medicine Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Locklear
J
J
Romines
C
C
Taylor
K A
KA
Yearby
W
W
Stokes
W S
WS
D000821:Animal Feed / Q000592:standards*; D000818:Animals; D005511:Food Handling / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006245:Hardness Tests / Q000295:instrumentation; D012377:Rodentia; D013242:Sterilization