A theory of the ontogeny of the chicken humoral immune system: the consequences of diversification by gene hyperconversion and its extension to rabbit.
The immune system's repertoire is generated in two stages: Stage I results in a small size high copy number repertoire that is diversified by "mutation" to result in a large size low copy number repertoire referred to as Stage II. The Stage I or high copy number repertoire is derived from information stored directly in the genome by two mechanisms. (a) The copy-cassette mechanism: the Ig-locus has one rearrangeable V gene segment which acts as recipient for controlled gene conversion in cis from a set of donor V gene segments that results in a family of subunits, L and H. This is illustrated by the avian systems. (b) The cassette-exchange mechanism: the Ig-locus has many rearrangeable V gene segments which are fused into transcription units, the products of which are a family of L and H subunits identical in function to those resulting from the copy-cassette mechanism. This is illustrated by the murine or human systems. It is possible for a species to use both mechanisms, copy-cassette at one Ig locus and cassette-exchange at the other Ig locus. This seems to obtain in the rabbit system. Further, it is possible to encode the high copy number repertoire directly in the genome as tandemly repeated rearranged transcription units as one sees in shark (a genomic analogue of the cassette-exchange mechanism). We have discussed here and elsewhere (Cohn and Langman, 1990) the consequences of these mechanisms for haplotype exclusion and functional responsiveness to antigen. The Stage I or high copy number repertoire generated by any of the above mechanisms is now a substrate for "mutation" which generates the low copy number or Stage II repertoire. These three species are compared in table V. The high copy number repertoire is small but the response to any antigen that it recognizes is rapid. The low copy number repertoire is large but responsiveness to any antigen it recognizes is slow. Cooperativity between the two repertoires optimizes the overall responsiveness with respect to rapidity of response and range of responsiveness. The use of a copy-cassette mechanism requires that the phi B cell undergoing gene conversion have a single rearranged L- and H-chain haplotype (L+/oH+/o). The reason is that conversion can correct an aberrantly rearranged transcription unit and generate an unacceptable level of doubles. In order to have one chromosome functionally rearranged and the homologue in the germline configuration, a selection mechanism is required.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Langman
R E
RE
Developmental Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute, San Diego, CA 92138-9216.
Cohn
M
M
D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D000916:Antibody Diversity / Q000235:genetics; D001402:B-Lymphocytes / Q000166:cytology / Q000276:immunology; D005075:Biological Evolution; D002060:Bursa of Fabricius / Q000166:cytology / Q000276:immunology; D002642:Chick Embryo; D002645:Chickens / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000276:immunology*; D005785:Gene Conversion; D007107:Immune System / Q000254:growth & development*; D007136:Immunoglobulins / Q000235:genetics; D051379:Mice; D008954:Models, Biological; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D011817:Rabbits / Q000235:genetics / Q000276:immunology*; D013045:Species Specificity
D007136:Immunoglobulins