title: Comparison of nephrostomy drainage systems.
abstract: Forty patients undergoing nephrostomy insertion were randomised into 2 groups: those maintained on intermittently closed and those on permanently closed drainage systems. The average cost of managing a patient in the former group was one-eighth that of the latter and was not associated with any increase in morbidity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: McLoughlin
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Farah
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004322:Drainage / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004739:England; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D009403:Nephrostomy, Percutaneous / Q000295:instrumentation*; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D014517:Ureteral Obstruction / Q000601:surgery*