Reanalysing rote-learned phrases: individual differences in the transition to multi-word speech.
The present study investigates the possibility that the previously documented relationship between referential-expressive and nominal-pronominal styles (Nelson, 1975) may be best explained not so much in terms of 'object-orientation' or 'noun-preference', as in terms of the direction from which different children break into structure, with some children tending to construct patterns by combining two or more items from their single-word vocabularies and others tending to develop patterns by gaining productive control over 'slots' in previously unanalysed phrases. In order to do so it makes use of a methodology for distinguishing between productive and unanalysed multi-word speech proposed in Lieven, Pine & Dresner-Barnes (1992) which is applied to observational and maternal-report data from a longitudinal study of seven children between the ages of 0;11 and 1;8. The results suggest not only that variation in children's early word combinations can indeed be explained in terms of different routes to multi-word speech, but also that, far from being atypical, a strategy involving the breaking down of originally unanalysed phrases may be used by all children, though to varying degrees.
Pine
J M
JM
Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.
Lieven
E V
EV
D002657:Child Development; D002663:Child Language; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007804:Language Development; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D014705:Verbal Behavior; D014706:Verbal Learning