title: [Yield of detection of Clostridium difficile toxin versus stool culture in the study of nosocomial diarrhea].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of the study was to determine whether the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stools may be more profitable than conventional stool cultures for the etiologic study of nosocomial diarrhea and to analyze what risk factors favor the development of nosocomial diarrhea by C. difficile.
  
  
  METHODS
  The presence of enteropathogens and A and B toxins of C. difficile were investigated (by monoclonal antibody enzymoimmunoassay) in stools of patients with nosocomial diarrhea. A series of patients simultaneously admitted without diarrhea were selected as the control group.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During a 6 month period 92 patients with nosocomial diarrhea and 82 controls without diarrhea were studied. The C. difficile toxin was detected in 8 of these 174 patients (4.6%). Eight point seven percent of the nosocomial diarrheas were related with C. difficile while only 1% were due to an enteropathogen (Salmonella enteritidis). C. difficile toxin was not detected in any patient who did not have diarrhea. In comparison with the patients with diarrhea due to other causes, the patients with diarrhea by C. difficile had more frequently received antibiotics over the previous 7 days (57 vs 88%) and had been hospitalized for a longer time (> or = 7 days) (58 vs 88%) (p < 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In the author's institution infection by Clostridium difficile is the most frequent cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea, especially in patients admitted for a prolonged time or who receive antibiotics. The routine investigation of enteropathogens in the cases of nosocomial diarrhea does not seem justified while the detection of the A and B toxins of C. difficile may be more profitable.
authors.affiliation: Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rabasa
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Aguado
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lizasoaín
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Pedraza
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Arribas
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lumbreras
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Otero
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Noriega
mesh_terms: D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D001427:Bacterial Toxins / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D016360:Clostridioides difficile; D003428:Cross Infection / Q000382:microbiology*; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000382:microbiology*; D004768:Enterotoxins / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors
chemical_list: D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D001427:Bacterial Toxins; D004768:Enterotoxins; C041348:tcdA protein, Clostridium difficile; C031815:toxB protein, Clostridium difficile
vernacular_title: Rentabilidad de la detección de toxina de Clostridium difficile frente a coprocultivo para el estudio de la diarrea nosocomial.