title: Comparison of different measurements of lean body mass in normal individuals and in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.
abstract: To evaluate different methods of measuring lean body mass (LBM) in chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) patients, we first made comparisons in seven normal subjects. Seven methods (total body potassium [TBK] counting, bioelectrical impedance with calculations according to Segal and Deurenberg, near-infrared interactance with and without exercise level included as a variable, anthropometric measurements, and creatinine kinetics) were compared with the standard method of underwater weighing (UW) for measuring LBM. Significant correlations with LBM measured by UW (r > 0.938) were found with LBM measured by all other methods. Compared with UW, the best result in normals was found with TBK as it had high r values, small y-intercepts, and slopes of regression lines close to unity in both measurements of LBM and %LBM; in addition, fat-free mass index by TBK best approximated that by UW and TBK had the lowest mean prediction error with UW. In 11 patients on CPD, LBM was measured by all the above methods except UW. Significant correlations of all methods with LBM measured by TBK used as the reference standard were noted (all r > 0.76) in the CPD population. The LBM measured by creatinine kinetics correlated best (by kilograms or percentage of body weight [%BW]) with LBM from TBK compared with the other methods in which values tended to be higher. The fat-free mass index by creatinine output was nearest to the fat-free mass index by TBK. The root mean square prediction error was lowest between LBM by creatinine output and that by TBK. The findings support the concept of measuring creatinine outputs in CPD patients for estimates of LBM as an index of nutritional status as well as for creatinine clearances as an index of adequacy. Total body potassium and creatinine output measurements of LBM reflect the LBM at normal body fluid volumes ("dry weight") and may be better indices of nutrition in dialysis patients than the other techniques, which include excess fluid in the LBM.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Missouri Health Sciences Center, Dalton Research Center and Dialysis Clinic, Inc, Columbia.
authors.forename: W K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Lo
authors.forename: B F
authors.initials: BF
authors.lastname: Prowant
authors.forename: H L
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: S B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Gamboa
authors.forename: K D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Nolph
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Flynn
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Londeree
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Keshaviah
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Emerson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015992:Body Mass Index; D001835:Body Weight; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010530:Peritoneal Dialysis; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012016:Reference Values; D013997:Time Factors