The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
The effect of two hypnotic induction styles on subjective experience was measured in an experiment in which 44 subjects participated in both traditional direct hypnosis, induced by the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A, and indirect hypnosis (presented in counterbalanced order), followed by 4 minutes of rest before dehypnosis. The depth of hypnosis was measured retrospectively by a subjective scale, and the structure of experiences was measured by the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Subjects were subsequently administered the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form B, so that awareness of their hypnotizability would not affect their subjective depth reports. No differences were found in a comparison of subjects' structure of experiences in direct and indirect hypnosis. In addition, low and medium hypnotizable subjects reported indirect hypnosis as deeper. This may reflect the possibility that while hypnotized different mechanisms come into play for subjects high in hypnotizability compared to those who are less hypnotizable.
Szabó
C
C
Institute of Psychology, Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen, Hungary.
D000328:Adult; D003243:Consciousness; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006990:Hypnosis / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D010555:Personality Inventory; D013404:Suggestion