Flash and pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in C57BL/6J and B6CBAF1/J mice.
Visual system responses (visual evoked potentials) to flash (FVEP) and pattern reversal (PRVEP) stimuli were recorded in mice. Two strains were used: black C57BL/6J mice and agouti B6CBAF1/J mice (first generation offspring of C57BL/6J females and CBA/J males.) Subjects were sedated with ketamine and xylazine. Flash rate (FVEP) and stimulus spatial frequency and pattern reversal rate (PRVEP) were varied to determine optimum stimulus parameters. Normative FVEP and PRVEP data were collected from mice of both strains after determination of optimum parameters. Five positive and four negative alternating peaks were routinely observed in the FVEP, while three positive and three negative alternating peaks were seen with the PRVEP. Varying the flash rate, the pattern reversal rate, and spatial frequency significantly affected nearly all amplitude and latency measures in the responses. Significant differences between strains were seen on some, but not all, latency and amplitude measures when the stimulus parameters were varied.
Strain
G M
GM
Veterinary Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803-8420.
Tedford
B L
BL
D000818:Animals; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL / Q000502:physiology*; D008815:Mice, Inbred Strains / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013997:Time Factors