Comparison of regional ophthalmic anesthesia produced by pH-adjusted 0.75% and 0.5% bupivacaine and 1% and 1.5% etidocaine, all with hyaluronidase.
Two concentrations of etidocaine (1 and 1.5%) and of pH-adjusted bupivacaine (0.5 and 0.75%, pH 6.8), all fortified with hyaluronidase, were compared as local anesthetics in regional ophthalmic surgery for cataract extraction. The series comprised 160 patients assigned randomly to four groups (n = 40). Each patient received one of the four anesthetics in a double blind manner. The technique used was an inferolateral intraconal injection (3 mL) followed by a medial extraconal injection (3 mL). Supplemental injections were given at 10 and 20 min, if needed. At 10 min, globe akinesia was satisfactory in both etidocaine groups and in the 0.75% bupivacaine group (78-80% of patients), but in only 37% of the 0.5% bupivacaine group. In lid akinesia, the 0.75% bupivacaine group gained the highest scores, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Perioperative analgesia was better in both bupivacaine groups, in which only 3 and 5 patients felt pain compared to 7 and 12 in the etidocaine groups (P < 0.05). Of these local anesthetics, pH-adjusted 0.75% bupivacaine is recommended for regional ophthalmic anesthesia.
Sarvela
P J
PJ
Eye Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000772:Anesthesia, Local; D002045:Bupivacaine; D002387:Cataract Extraction; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005041:Etidocaine; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006821:Hyaluronoglucosaminidase; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged
D006821:Hyaluronoglucosaminidase; D005041:Etidocaine; D002045:Bupivacaine