A randomized trial of low-air-loss beds for treatment of pressure ulcers.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of low-air-loss beds for the treatment of pressure ulcers in nursing homes.


METHODS
Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.


METHODS
Three teaching nursing homes in Los Angeles, Calif.


METHODS
Eighty-four nursing home residents with trunk or trochanter pressure ulcers (Shea stage > or = 2).


METHODS
Subjects were randomly assigned to use either a low-air-loss bed (n = 43) or a 10-cm corrugated foam mattress (n = 41) throughout the healing of their ulcers.


METHODS
Ulcers were assessed twice weekly using surface area and two observational scales (median follow-up, 37.5 days; range, 4 to 571 days).


RESULTS
Groups were similar with respect to demographics, medical variables, wound care, and early dropouts. Results indicate more than a threefold improvement in median rate of healing for low-air-loss beds compared with foam mattresses (9.0 vs 2.5 mm2/d; P = .0002). This finding was true for deep as well as superficial ulcers (deep ulcers, 9.9 vs 0.7 mm2/d; P = .02; superficial ulcers, 9.0 vs 3.2 mm2/d; P = .004). Cox regression models revealed that the bed, ulcer depth, and fecal continence had independent effects on healing. After controlling for fecal continence, the deep and superficial subgroups using low-air-loss beds remained 2.5 times more likely to heal in a given length of time compared with those using foam mattresses (combined cure probability ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 5.17; P < .004).


CONCLUSIONS
Low-air-loss beds provide substantial improvement compared with foam mattresses despite other factors in pressure ulcer healing.
Ferrell
B A
BA
Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine.
Osterweil
D
D
Christenson
P
P
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001513:Beds; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009735:Nursing Homes; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000628:therapy*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012044:Regression Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome