title: Measuring public attitudes on abortion: methodological and substantive considerations.
abstract: Data from a 1989 CBS News/New York Times survey are used to examine the effect that the framing of questions on abortion has on estimates of what proportions of the population support various legal positions. The nationwide data and results from six state polls show that general questions with only two or three options overestimate the proportions of respondents who either favor a ban on all abortion or who would allow abortion under all circumstances. Questions that pose specific circumstances result in movement of respondents out of extreme categories and into more moderate ones. Even respondents who indicate they would favor abortion in all specific circumstances and those who favor abortion in none are likely to moderate their views when asked if they support restrictions that have been proposed in a number of states.
authors.affiliation: American University.
authors.forename: E A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Cook
authors.forename: T G
authors.initials: TG
authors.lastname: Jelen
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wilcox
mesh_terms: D000029:Abortion, Legal / Q000523:psychology*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D032921:Consensus; D005260:Female; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007179:Incest / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011247:Pregnancy; D011639:Public Opinion; D011902:Rape / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D014481:United States; D014933:Women's Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence