Effect of optic nerve stimulation on neurons in pericruciate cortex of cats.
The distribution of optic chiasm input to different types of neurons in pericruciate cortex of cats agreed with previous work using light flashes. Neuron response times served to differentiate the input pathways to pericruciate cortex, and the types of neurons they influence. Input from the optic chiasm arrived in three distinct surges: the first via the superior colliculus, the second via an unidentified pathway, and the third via the visual cortex. A fourth, diffuse surge arrived in the postcruciate cortex via some unidentified pathway. Stimulation of the contralateral side of the optic chiasm had a weaker effect than stimulation of the ipsilateral side; it evoked activity at a higher threshold, with fewer spikes per response, and at a longer latency. The difference in response latency between the two sides was largest on neurons responding to the first surge, decreasing in later surges, and being least on those neurons responding to the last surge. About 2.3% of the postcruciate and 15% of the precruciate neurons responded only to optic chiasm stimulation; they were isolated in the granular layers, and their responses could not be influenced by prior cutaneous input. It is suggested that much of the visual input to pericruciate cortex serves to modulate on-going cortical output and, thereby, the behavior of the animal.
Gahery
Y
Y
Unite de Neurosciences Integratives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France.
Towe
A L
AL
D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats / Q000502:physiology*; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D005552:Forelimb / Q000294:innervation; D007839:Functional Laterality; D008839:Microelectrodes; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D009897:Optic Chiasm / Q000502:physiology*; D009900:Optic Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012867:Skin / Q000294:innervation; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology