title: Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.
abstract: The number of responses rats made in a "run" of consecutive left-lever presses, prior to a trial-ending right-lever press, was differentiated using a targeted percentile procedure. Under the nondifferential baseline, reinforcement was provided with a probability of .33 at the end of a trial, irrespective of the run on that trial. Most of the 30 subjects made short runs under these conditions, with the mean for the group around three. A targeted percentile schedule was next used to differentiate run length around the target value of 12. The current run was reinforced if it was nearer the target than 67% of those runs in the last 24 trials that were on the same side of the target as the current run. Programming reinforcement in this way held overall reinforcement probability per trial constant at .33 while providing reinforcement differentially with respect to runs more closely approximating the target of 12. The mean run for the group under this procedure increased to approximately 10. Runs approaching the target length were acquired even though differentiated responding produced the same probability of reinforcement per trial, decreased the probability of reinforcement per response, did not increase overall reinforcement rate, and generally substantially reduced it (i.e., in only a few instances did response rate increase sufficiently to compensate for the increase in the number of responses per trial). Models of behavior predicated solely on molar reinforcement contingencies all predict that runs should remain short throughout this experiment, because such runs promote both the most frequent reinforcement and the greatest reinforcement per press. To the contrary, 29 of 30 subjects emitted runs in the vicinity of the target, driving down reinforcement rate while greatly increasing the number of presses per pellet. These results illustrate the powerful effects of local reinforcement contingencies in changing behavior, and in doing so underscore a need for more dynamic quantitative formulations of operant behavior to supplement or supplant the currently prevalent static ones.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Neurosciences, WRAIR, Washington, DC 20307-5100.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Galbicka
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Kautz
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Jagers
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology