title: Evaluation of contrast acuity and defocus curve in bifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses.
abstract: We compared visual quality of the following intraocular lenses in a prospective study: monofocal, True Vista bifocal, 3M diffractive bifocal, and Nordan aspheric VariFocal silicone. Four to six months postoperatively we measured distance acuity, Snellen near acuity (Lighthouse chart), reading acuity (Nieden chart), and contrast acuity at far and near focus (Regan charts: 96%, 50%, 25%, 11% contrast) with different pupil sizes. A defocus curve was obtained by spectacle defocus (+1 diopter [D] to -5 D). Eleven patients had True Vista in one eye and monofocal in the fellow. Contrast acuity at far focus decreased with decreasing contrast and increasing pupil size. This decrease was more pronounced with the True Vista than with the monofocal lenses. These differences were significant, with a 4.5 mm pupil at lower contrast (25%, P = .02; 11%, P = .01). Depth of focus was 4.5 D (+1.0 D to -2.0 D) with True Vista lenses and 2.5 D (+1.0 D to -1.5 D) with monofocal lenses. Corrected distance acuity was 20/22 with True Vista, 20/25 with 3M, and 20/20 with VariFocal. Distance corrected Snellen near acuity was 20/39 with True Vista, 20/34 with 3M, and 20/57 with VariFocal. Distance corrected reading acuity was 20/29 with True Vista, 20/23 with 3M, and 20/44 with VariFocal (P = .005). Contrast acuity at far focus was best with the VariFocal IOL, followed by True Vista and 3M. At near focus it was best with 3M, followed by True Vista and VariFocal. Contrast acuity at near focus was lower than at far focus. Average acuity differences were as follows: VariFocal 0.43, P = .01; True Vista 0.19, P = .05; 3M 0.04, P = .3. Depth of focus was 4.5 D (+1.0 D to -3.5 D) with True Vista and 3M and was 3 D (+1.0 D to -2.0 D) with VariFocal. Each design offers unique features. VariFocal is best at distance, but near vision is not sufficient. The 3M lens is best at near vision but distance contrast acuity is somewhat reduced. The True Vista lens provides a good compromise as distance contrast acuity is good and near vision is sufficient.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalamology, School of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Klinikum Mannheim, Germany.
authors.forename: M C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Knorz
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Claessens
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Schaefer
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Seiberth
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Liesenhoff
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002387:Cataract Extraction; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007910:Lenses, Intraocular; D055095:Optics and Photonics; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011680:Pupil / Q000502:physiology; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology*