Community care, competition and coercion: a legal perspective on privatized mental health care.
Even as the Clinton administration considers an increased federal commitment to mental health care, delivery of such care remains fixed at the state level. In Massachusetts, state officials are privatizing mental health care on an unprecedented scale, an experiment that promises to provide better care at lower cost. This Note explores whether privatization can achieve that lofty goal, given a legal system that has made individual patient autonomy its preeminent value. The author concludes that wide-scale privatization and modern notions of self-determination can only coexist with a significant investment in the support services that are critical to the community tenure of former state hospital patients.
Wisor
R L
RL
Cornell University.
D003134:Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003156:Community Mental Health Services / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003363:Cost Control / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003688:Deinstitutionalization / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004465:Economic Competition / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011332:Privatization / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013221:State Health Plans / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States