title: A randomised dose intensity study in ovarian carcinoma comparing chemotherapy given at four week intervals for six cycles with half dose chemotherapy given for twelve cycles.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The importance of dose intensity has not been clearly defined in ovarian cancer and we present a prospectively randomised trial of dose intensity in patients with ovarian cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ninety-nine patients with FIGO stage Ic, II, III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomised to receive cycles of standard dose cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and carboplatin (300 mg/m2) alternating with adriamycin (50 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (5 G/m2) for 6 cycles at monthly intervals (49 patients) or cycles of half dose cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) and carboplatin (150 mg/m2) alternating with adriamycin (25 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (2.5 G/m2) for 12 cycles at monthly intervals (50 patients). Patients in each arm were well balanced for major prognostic factors.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The combined clinical response rate (complete response and partial response) on the 6 month arm was 76% compared with 48% on the low dose intensity arm (p = 0.009). With a median follow up of 25.7 months the median survival on the low dose intensity arm is 20.9 months. The median survival point on the 6 month arm has not yet been reached. The median progression free interval on the 12 month arm was 19.8 months, the median value has not yet been reached on the standard arm. The amount of residual tumour following initial laparotomy was the only significant independent variable affecting survival (p = 0.0001). The mean received dose intensity of each drug was greater than 80% of the planned dose intensity. More patients had clinical disease progression during treatment on the low dose intensity arm (42%) when compared to the standard dose intensity arm (8%) (p = 0.0003). Fifteen patients on the standard dose arm experienced a total of 18 delays and 5 patients on the low dose arm experienced 17 delays. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were similar for both standard and low dose cycles of chemotherapy with a consequent benefit for patients receiving fewer cycles even though these were of higher dose.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The combination studied was more effective when given at the higher dose intensity and the improved response and survival was not accompanied by a significant increase in toxicity.
authors.affiliation: CRC Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, U.K.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Crowther
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Renninson
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Prendiville
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ranson
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lind
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Patel
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dougal
authors.forename: C H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Buckley
authors.forename: V R
authors.initials: VR
authors.lastname: Tindall
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000401:mortality; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015996:Survival Rate
chemical_list: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents