title: Very distal bypass for salvage of the severely ischemic extremity.
abstract: Forty-six bypass grafts to tibial arteries distal to the ankle were performed in 35 patients for salvage of extremities threatened by gangrene or nonhealing ulcers (grade III, category 5) or ischemic rest pain (grade II, category 4). Most patients (80%) were diabetic, with severely calcified arteries, whom previously we would have considered as candidates for primary amputation. All reconstructions were performed with autologous saphenous vein. Inflow was from the common femoral artery in 5 (11%), the popliteal artery in 25 (54%), or the mid-tibial arteries in 16 (35%). Life-table analysis was used to calculate primary patency and limb salvage. Results were analyzed according to origin of inflow, outflow, or configuration of the conduit (in situ saphenous vein, n = 29 [63%], reversed saphenous vein, n = 11 [24%], or nonreversed saphenous vein, n = 6 [13%]). Overall cumulative primary graft patency at 2 years for all grafts was 72%, and the cumulative limb salvage rate was 89% for the same interval. No significant differences were seen in comparing grafts originating from the femoral or popliteal level with those arising from the tibial arteries. No significant differences were noted in graft patency or limb salvage among grafts with a posterior tibial, dorsalis pedis, or plantar artery outflow. No significant difference was noted between in situ saphenous vein grafts and reversed saphenous vein grafts. A significant decreased primary patency was noted for grafts performed with nonreversed, translocated saphenous vein. We conclude that bypass grafts to the ankle or foot vessels are beneficial and should be considered for limb salvage in extremities with gangrene, ischemic ulceration, or ischemic rest pain. In our experience, in situ saphenous vein grafts or reversed saphenous vein grafts performed similarly, whereas nonreversed saphenous vein grafts have a poorer prognosis. Vessel wall calcification requires a modification in technique for performance of these grafts but did not affect long-term performance or limb salvage, and thus should not be considered a contraindication to vascular reconstruction. The operative microscope was used in 61% (28 of 46) of these cases and found useful in creating these delicate anastomoses. Additional follow-up is needed to document the long-term results of these very distal reconstructions.
authors.affiliation: Section of Vascular Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-6904.
authors.forename: W J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Quiñones-Baldrich
authors.forename: M D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Colburn
authors.forename: S S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Ahn
authors.forename: H A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Gelabert
authors.forename: W S
authors.initials: WS
authors.lastname: Moore
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D001161:Arteriosclerosis / Q000601:surgery*; D003925:Diabetic Angiopathies / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000601:surgery; D005734:Gangrene; D006801:Humans; D007511:Ischemia / Q000601:surgery*; D007866:Leg / Q000098:blood supply*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011150:Popliteal Artery / Q000601:surgery; D012501:Saphenous Vein / Q000637:transplantation; D016909:Tibial Arteries / Q000601:surgery*; D014654:Vascular Patency