A comparison between ultrasonography and mammography, computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography for the detection of breast cancers.
Ultrasound (US) was compared with mammography (MMG), computed tomography (CT), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in its effectiveness to detect breast cancer masses and metastatic axillary nodes. Forty-seven breast cancer patients who all underwent MMG, US, CT, and DSA preoperatively in our institution between 1986 and 1990 were studied. US was able to detect tumors in all cases regardless of tumor size, whereas DSA detected T1-size tumors and MMG detected T2-size tumors in 40% and 64.7% of cases, respectively, being specifically inferior to US. It was found that MMG was least likely to detect papillotubular carcinoma, although microcalcification alone without a tumor mass on MMG improved detectability from 46.2% to 76.9%, according to the histological type. CT was found to be most sensitive to axillary node metastases (81.8%), followed by US (72.7%), but DSA was significantly unfavorable (42.9%). Thus, we concluded that US was superior to MMG, CT, and DSA for detecting breast cancer masses, but that CT was more advantageous than US, while DSA was of little value for evaluating axillary nodal status.
Tohnosu
N
N
Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.
Okuyama
K
K
Koide
Y
Y
Kikuchi
T
T
Awano
T
T
Matsubara
H
H
Sano
T
T
Nakaichi
H
H
Funami
Y
Y
Matsushita
K
K
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015901:Angiography, Digital Subtraction; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008327:Mammography; D008875:Middle Aged; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016217:Ultrasonography, Mammary