Galactosyl hydroxylysine and deoxypyridinoline: a methodological comparison.
Galactosyl hydroxylysine and deoxypyridinoline are at present the most promising markers of bone resorption. Various studies have indeed shown that these two markers discriminate with high accuracy subjects with different rates of bone turnover and that their accuracies and discriminate power are very similar. The aim of this paper is to compare the practicality and the reproducibility of the HPLC galactosyl hydroxylysine and deoxypyridinoline assays. In summary, this review shows that the galactosyl hydroxylysine and deoxypyridinoline HPLC assays differ mainly in the need, in using deoxypyridinoline, for an acid hydrolysis and a preextraction of the urine samples. This implies two major problems for deoxypyridinoline: 1) more time is required due to the cumbersome preanalytical procedures; and 2) a lower reproducibility. Our data, in fact, show that both the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation of the deoxypyridinoline assay are almost 100% higher than those of the galactosyl hydroxylysine assay.
Dipartimento di Biochimica, Biofisica e Chimica delle Macromolecole, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italy.
P
P
Bettica
D J
DJ
Baylink
L
L
Moro
D000328:Adult; D000596:Amino Acids / Q000652:urine*; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000652:urine; D001862:Bone Resorption / Q000652:urine*; D002648:Child; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006901:Hydroxylysine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000652:urine; D008970:Molecular Weight; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
D000596:Amino Acids; D015415:Biomarkers; D006901:Hydroxylysine; C007817:galactosylhydroxylysine; C036020:deoxypyridinoline