A randomised cross-over trial of antiemetic therapy for platinum-based chemotherapy. Improved control with an intensive multiagent regimen.
In a partially blinded randomised cross-over trial, 78 patients receiving cisplatinum based chemotherapy were assigned to receive two forms of antiemetic therapy: SAD, a regimen composed of serenace (haloperidol), ativan (lorazepam), and dexamethasone followed by low dose maxolon (metoclopramide) and STADMAX, a regimen composed of scopolamine (hyoscine), tavegyl (clemastine), ativan, dexamethasone and high dose maxolon. Each antiemetic regimen was given in random order, with the first and second cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy. 66 (85%) patients completed both cycles of antiemetic therapy and were available for the cross-over comparison. Significantly less acute vomiting, as assessed by nurse observer (P < 0.0001), and less delayed vomiting, as assessed by patient diary (P = 0.03), were seen with STADMAX. In the first 18 h, complete control of vomiting (no episodes) was achieved in 30 (45%) patients with STADMAX compared with 10 (15%) receiving SAD. Overall, major control of emesis (< or = 2 episodes) was achieved in 56 (85%) patients with STADMAX compared with 35 (53%) receiving SAD. Vomiting was also better controlled on STADMAX in the week after this initial 18 hour period based on the 7 day patient diary with no vomiting episodes in 18/65 (28%) on STADMAX vs. 13/65 (20%) on SAD. However, no significant differences in appetite, nausea or vomiting were found when based on linear analogue self assessment (LASA) scales recorded by patients. Significant differences in side effects of the two antiemetic regimens were noted on LASA scales with more dry mouth (P = 0.01), blurred vision (P = 0.03) and diarrhoea (P = 0.04) associated with STADMAX and more restlessness (P = 0.002) associated with SAD. Significantly, no episodes of dystonic reactions were seen among patients on either regimen. In the 68 patients who completed both cycles and were in a position to express a preference, 46 (68%) preferred STADMAX compared with only 20 (29%) who preferred SAD (P = 0.001), while 2 patients expressed no preference. It is concluded that STADMAX is the preferred regimen to SAD for the control of cisplatinum-related emesis. It has a role, both where specific serotonin 3 antagonists are not available and as a model for building more effective combinations where these agents are available.
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
M
M
Findlay
R J
RJ
Simes
K
K
Cox
K
K
Carmichael
T
T
Chey
E
E
McNeil
D
D
Raghavan
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000932:Antiemetics / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002945:Cisplatin / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014839:Vomiting / Q000139:chemically induced* / Q000517:prevention & control
D000932:Antiemetics; D002945:Cisplatin