title: Judgmental overshadowing: further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment.
abstract: We investigated a phenomenon called judgmental overshadowing. Subjects predicted whether each of several patients had a disease on the basis of whether or not the patient had each of two symptoms. For all the subjects, the presence of the disease was moderately contingent on the presence of one of the symptoms (S1). In Condition 1 of our first experiment, the presence of the disease was highly contingent on the presence of the other symptom (S2). In Condition 2, the presence of the disease was independent of S2. Judgmental overshadowing occurred in that the S1-disease contingency was judged to be stronger in Condition 2 than in Condition 1. Subsequent experiments showed that judgmental overshadowing depends little on the form of the judgment, is not due to a response bias or contrast effect, and does not depend on subjects' actively diagnosing each patient. These results are consistent with, and are generally predicted by, an associative-learning model of contingency judgment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104-2994.
authors.forename: P C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Price
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Yates
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002908:Chronic Disease; D005260:Female; D005334:Fever / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory