title: Bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonic fog in occupational asthma due to toluene diisocyanate.
abstract: To determine the validity of ultrasonic nebulization of distilled water (UNDW, "fog") in comparison with methacholine challenge, in the assessment of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) asthma, we evaluated 75 subjects exposed to TDI with work-related respiratory symptoms. Subjects were submitted to bronchial challenge with methacholine at first, thereafter to UNDW inhalation and to specific challenge with TDI. The diagnosis of TDI-asthma was made in 30 of 75 patients (40 percent) who developed a bronchoconstrictive response to the specific challenge (reactors). Sensitivity and specificity of UNDW alone, methacholine alone, and of the combination of the two tests were determined with the results of the specific challenge with TDI as the "gold standard." Both frequency and severity of bronchoconstrictive response to UNDW (FEV1 decrease > or = 15 percent) and the degree (PD15 FEV1) and frequency of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine were significantly higher in TDI reactors than in nonreactors. The UNDW had higher specificity (82.2 percent vs 51.1 percent) but lower sensitivity (40 percent vs 76.7 percent) than methacholine. The combination in parallel (positivity of any of the two challenges) of methacholine and UNDW challenge did not change sensitivity to a great extent (80 percent vs 76.7 percent), whereas combination in series (positivity of both challenges) had considerably greater specificity (86.7 percent vs 51.1 percent) than methacholine alone. We conclude that in the assessment of TDI-asthma, the validity of UNDW challenge alone is limited since it is insufficiently sensitive. Instead, combining UNDW and methacholine challenge when methacholine is positive improves our ability in identifying subjects with TDI-asthma diagnosed with the specific challenge. This procedure constitutes a first objective confirmation of a suggestive history of TDI-asthma that is useful for clinical purposes. However, especially for medicolegal purposes, the definitive diagnosis requires the specific challenge.
authors.affiliation: Specalization School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pavia, Italy.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Moscato
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dellabianca
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Corsico
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Biscaldi
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Gherson
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vinci
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000336:Aerosols; D001249:Asthma / Q000139:chemically induced* / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D016535:Bronchial Hyperreactivity / Q000175:diagnosis*; D001985:Bronchial Provocation Tests / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016210:Methacholine Chloride; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000139:chemically induced* / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014051:Toluene 2,4-Diisocyanate / Q000009:adverse effects*; D014465:Ultrasonics; D014867:Water
chemical_list: D000336:Aerosols; D014867:Water; D016210:Methacholine Chloride; D014051:Toluene 2,4-Diisocyanate