The ethics of choice in the struggle against industrial disease.
This article argues that broad recognition of the ethical basis for society's decisions about the reduction of the risks of workers, including notification, has been, is, and will be a more persuasive method of establishing programs implementing the rights to know and act in controlling the industrial vector in human disease than sheer power politics. If the argument is correct, then attention needs to be focused on the nature of the ethics of choice. The moral dialectic in the history of science and medicine is traced to the metaphysically assumed values of open and closed models of knowledge and action that determine how we weigh genetic and environmental factors in the process of choosing who shall live and who shall die of disease, with strong industrially generated vectors. The author suggests that we escape from the concepts of the closed systems of the past, whose grammar reflects values repugnant to the empowerment of those notified of risk, to open systems that enhance community-ecologic values of life and freedom.
Samuels
S W
SW
Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO, Washington, DC 20006.
D035843:Biomedical Research; D002755:Choice Behavior; D030881:Disclosure; D017007:Duty to Warn / Q000523:psychology; D004989:Ethics; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008678:Metaphysics; D016272:Occupational Health; D012306:Risk