A comparison of winged steel needles and Teflon cannulas in maintaining intravenous access during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
We have conducted a prospective study in 142 consecutive patients undergoing either gastroscopy or colonoscopy. The patients were randomized to have either a 23-gauge winged steel needle or a 23-gauge Teflon cannula inserted. The two groups were well matched, with 71 patients receiving each device. Intravenous access was achieved in every case. The steel needle was inserted at the first attempt in 65 of 71 cases (91.6%) compared with 67 of 71 cases (94.4%) for the Teflon cannula. Extravasation occurred in only 1 of 71 cases (1.4%) with Teflon cannulas compared with 18 of 71 cases (25.5%) of steel needle use (p < 0.01). Additionally, no Teflon cannula blocked completely, whereas 1 of 71 steel needles (1.4%) did so. Only 1 of 71 (1.4%) of the Teflon cannulas became difficult to flush compared with 12 of 71 steel needles (16.9%). The Teflon cannula was as easy to insert and provided significantly more reliable intravenous access than the steel needle.
Smith
M R
MR
Department of Medicine, Ipswich Hospital, Suffolk, United Kingdom.
Bell
G D
GD
Fulton
B
B
Quine
M A
MA
Morden
A E
AE
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002408:Catheters, Indwelling; D003113:Colonoscopy / Q000379:methods; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005773:Gastroscopy / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009339:Needles; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013232:Steel
D013232:Steel; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene