An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification.
Four experiments are reported on the identification of line drawings of common objects. In each experiment, performance on "unconventional" views of the objects, in which the major axis of the object was foreshortened, was compared to performance on more "conventional" views without appreciable foreshortening. In each experiment, except Experiment 2, where performance on the two views was experimentally equated, the foreshortened views were more difficult to identify than were the conventional views. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that if the foreshortened views were presented on a background with strong monocular depth cues, object identification was improved. This result suggests that part of the difficulty in identifying objects depicted from such a view stems from an improper depth interpretation of the object depictions. Experiments 3 and 4 examined visual field differences in the identification of the two types of object view. Results reported in the neuropsychological literature have shown that people with right-hemisphere damage have particular difficulty with the identification of unconventional views of objects that foreshorten major axes. Accordingly, it was expected that there would be a left visual field advantage for the foreshortened views. Neither experiment yielded any visual field effects consistent with this expectation. Possible reasons for the lack of a field effect are discussed.
Humphrey
G K
GK
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Jolicoeur
P
P
D003463:Cues; D003867:Depth Perception; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D014794:Visual Fields