A comparison of five different methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship.
Analysis of sagittal jaw relationship is important in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, and can be investigated by angular or linear parameters. In the present study an analysis was performed using profile cephalograms of 40 children with skeletal Class II malocclusion. A correlation analysis is presented, involving five different methods of expressing sagittal jaw relationships. Whilst some degree of agreement could be noted, it was not possible to suggest a pair of measurements, which in combination, could give a more accurate picture of sagittal jaw relationships.
Kirchner
J
J
Division of Orthodontics, Dental School, University of Vienna, Austria.
Williams
S
S
D002508:Cephalometry / Q000379:methods*; D002648:Child; D002680:Chin / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008312:Malocclusion, Angle Class II / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology*; D008334:Mandible / Q000473:pathology*; D008437:Maxilla / Q000473:pathology*; D009295:Nasal Bone / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement; D015203:Reproducibility of Results