Comparison between rapid and slow tissue expansion in breast reconstruction.
Fifty women scheduled for breast reconstruction surgery with tissue expansion were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group the tissue was expanded rapidly, i.e., once a day, starting 1 week postoperatively, and in the other group it was expanded slowly, i.e., once a week, starting after 2 weeks. The expansion periods were 14 and 41 days, respectively. In both groups the expansion volume was about 200% of the final breast prosthesis. The expanders were replaced by textured, gel-filled implants after 3 months. Follow-up examinations were made after 6 and 12 months to evaluate breast softness. A subjective method, Breast Augmentation Classification, and an objective method, applanation tonometry, were used and showed good correlation. Subjectively, the capsular contraction rate after 1 year was 33.5% in the whole series: 40% in the rapid expansion group and 27% in the slow expansion group. Objectively, the capsular contraction rate was 50.5% in all patients: 60% in the rapid group and 41.5% in the slow group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at any time with either method. Irradiated patients included in the study did not show poorer results. The results obtained after 6 months remained stable up to 12 months after the implantation of the permanent prosthesis. The importance of objective evaluation to compare different series is discussed.
Wickman
M
M
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D016462:Mammaplasty / Q000379:methods*; D015411:Mastectomy, Modified Radical; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D013997:Time Factors; D015626:Tissue Expansion / Q000379:methods*; D015625:Tissue Expansion Devices