title: Measures of mental representation: clinical and theoretical considerations.
abstract: The authors explored the strengths and limitations of measures of mental representation from attachment theory and object relations theory. Using a study of adolescent mothers' mental representations while pregnant and their association to later mother-infant attachment (Levine, Tuber, Slade, & Ward, 1991), they compared the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) (George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985) and the Krohn Object Representation Scale (KORS) (Krohn & Mayman, 1974) in terms of their clinical and theoretical utility. The authors argue that the AAI does not sufficiently explicate less adaptive object-representations, and that attachment research must address a broader clinical population to have a greater heuristic impact on clinical theory and practice. The AAI relies less on clinical inference than the KORS, however, thus providing a more viable mechanism for predicting parent-child relationship patterns. Clinical examples are provided to illustrate the process and content of the two scoring systems.
authors.affiliation: City College, City University of New York, NY.
authors.forename: L V
authors.initials: LV
authors.lastname: Levine
authors.forename: S B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Tuber
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009769:Object Attachment; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D011247:Pregnancy