title: [Damage assessment of a stainless steel lock pin].
abstract: Metallurgical investigation methods were used to determine the cause of failure in a broken and explanted lock pin. Material analysis revealed that the implant material consists of a stainless steel. The fractographic investigation indicated a fatigue fracture with its typical characteristics. Macroscopic damage of the outer surface of the implant caused the fatigue fracture in the bone fracture region. Once the lock pin had failed, further crack propagation of the fatigue fracture was largely dependent on stress intensity and/or overloading of the implant in the bone fracture region as well as on the number of stress cycles. The following items should be observed by the physician applying implant materials: 1. A material showing only very small surface scratches in the order of magnitude of thousands of millimeters should not be implanted at all, because even the smallest surface roughness may cause fractures of the material. 2. Implant materials from low-cost manufacturers should never be applied. Such materials often show construction faults (in the present case an unnecessary weld in the upper part of the lock pin) or the material itself is not well conditioned (in the present case an insufficient annealing treatment).
authors: Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Institut für Werkstoffwissenschaft, Stuttgart.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Kallfass
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Kühnemann
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Steeb
mesh_terms: D001858:Bone Nails / Q000592:standards*; D005264:Femoral Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D006245:Hardness Tests; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008669:Metallurgy / Q000379:methods; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D013314:Stress, Mechanical
vernacular_title: Schadensanalyse eines Verriegelungsnagels aus hochlegiertem Stahl.