title: Social skills in the context of learning disability definitions: a reply to Gresham and Elliott and directions for the future.
abstract: In this article we review the evidence on the status of a social skills deficit as a learning disability (LD) by examining social skills deficits in the context of learning disability definitions. For the most part, social skills deficits fall within the terms that are specified in the definitions; that is, when there is evidence of neurological involvement, social skills deficit as a learning disability is consistent with the focus on listening and speaking that is characteristic of most definitions of learning disabilities. We also conclude that the absence of limiting conditions in extant definitions of learning disabilities makes it difficult to exclude any particular skill or type of knowledge from falling within the bounds of the definitions. Furthermore, we argue that the critical issue centers on the reformulation of the definition of learning disabilities. We suggest two directions in future work: First, the term "learning disability" should be limited to intentional learning contexts. Acceptance of this limitation would clarify at least some of the confusion regarding the domain of learning disabilities. Second, learning disability definitions should become more responsive to recent research on the nature of learning.
authors: Learning Centre, Calgary, Alberta.
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Conte
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Andrews
mesh_terms: D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy; D002648:Child; D004519:Education, Special / Q000639:trends; D004608:Eligibility Determination / Q000639:trends; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007859:Learning Disabilities / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D010379:Peer Group; D012919:Social Behavior