The potential impact of the resource-based relative value scale on the practice of nuclear medicine.
The Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) is finally here. A system designed to equate physician work across the specialties, it has its own peculiar and unique problems. Modeling of the system was based on the single physician-patient interaction; it may not work properly for laboratory specialties. There are other unique considerations concerning how the model was constructed. Although data were collected specifically for nuclear medicine, they were not used in the final computations. There is disagreement over whether those data would benefit or hurt nuclear medicine reimbursement. As presently implemented, the RBRVS poses grave dangers for the future of nuclear medicine. These dangers come not only in the professional reimbursement section of the rules but in the technical component areas as well. Estimates for reduction of income by 1996 range as high as 55% for nuclear medicine. When one factors the implementation of the RBRVS by independent insurance carriers into the equation, the entire economic future becomes muddy. A brief historical review of the RBRVS, as well as discussion of potential future implications of this type of reimbursement system, is presented. Prognostication is at least as inexact a science as reimbursement. Hopefully, the author's outlook on the future of nuclear medicine is more pessimistic than it need be.
Henkin
R E
RE
Department of Radiology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153.
D003363:Cost Control / Q000639:trends; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D008484:Medicaid / Q000191:economics; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics; D009683:Nuclear Medicine / Q000191:economics*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000191:economics; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms / Q000639:trends; D015895:Relative Value Scales; D014481:United States