[Social medicine position in the rehabilitation discharge report from the viewpoint of quality assurance].
The sociomedical statements given on the basis of Sociomedical Clinic apraisement of 103 patients were compared with those rendered at discharge from previous in-patient rehabilitation. Discrepant judgements and evaluation problems in describing functional capacity at work are pointed out, and their causes discussed. Proposals are submitted for enhancing more effective cooperation between rehabilitation clinics and the Sociomedical Services of the pension insurance administrations.
Seger
W
W
Ltd. Arzt, Landesversicherungsanstalt Oldenburg-Bremen, FRG.
D000328:Adult; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004608:Eligibility Determination / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010351:Patient Discharge / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational; D012943:Social Security / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence
Die sozialmedizinische Stellungnahme im Rehabilitations-Abschlussbericht unter Qualitätsgesichtspunkten.