title: [Interference versus low frequency. A comparison of 2 methods of electric muscle stimulation].
abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether inferential or low-frequency stimulation can produce a stronger and less painful contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle in 20 healthy subjects. Both currents used a pulse rate of 50 Hz. The perceived discomfort experienced with each type of electrical stimulation was quantified by the use of a visual analogue scale. An isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex) was used to assess peak torque. Paired t-test demonstrated that inferential stimulation was perceived to be significantly less uncomfortable than low-frequency stimulation and that inferential stimulation produced a significantly greater peak torque of muscle contraction than low-frequency stimulation. This study indicates that inferential stimulation can produce an electrically induced muscle contraction which is stronger and less unpleasant than low-frequency stimulation.
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Gubler
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Hildebrandt
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009119:Muscle Contraction; D010146:Pain / Q000209:etiology
vernacular_title: Interferenz versus Niederfrequenz. Ein Vergleich zweier Verfahren zur elektrischen Muskelstimulation.