title: Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review.
abstract: The article reviews the literature on the effects of direct versus indirect hypnotic suggestions. A conceptual and methodological analysis of direct versus indirect suggestions is also provided. Three conclusions follow from the review: (a) Contrary to views of Ericksonian hypnotists, suggestion style has little effect on objective responding to hypnotic test items; (b) studies of clinical- and laboratory-induced pain and other measures of subjective experience have yielded contradictory results--however, the best controlled studies have not indicated that indirect suggestions are superior to direct suggestions; and (c) there is insufficient evidence to conclude that hypnotizability level and suggestion wording interact, such that low hypnotizable subjects are particularly responsive to indirect suggestions. Methodological and conceptual problems in defining and studying hypnotic communications, the lack of rigorous experimental controls, and research issues and directions are highlighted.
authors: Psychology Department, Ohio University, Athens 45701.
authors: S J
authors: SJ
authors: Lynn
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Neufeld
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Maré
mesh_terms: D001143:Arousal; D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D006990:Hypnosis / Q000379:methods*; D006991:Hypnosis, Anesthetic / Q000379:methods; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010551:Personality; D013404:Suggestion