[Ten years of experience with Nova T in office practice. 630 cases].
The author reports a retrospective study of 630 Nova T inserted by a medical gynecologist. The Nova T was chosen as intrauterine device because of its longevity and its ease of insertion and removal. Nulliparity was not an absolute contraindication (10% of cases in the series). Particular attention was paid to information given to the women concerned: possibility of menstrual irregularities, infections more likely to be transmitted by a partner than by the IUD, and above all the possibility of pregnancy: Pearl index 0.96. Uterine retroversion in no way interfered with the insertion technique. Hysterometry was routine (mean: 7.25 cm). Threads were cut 2-3 cm from the cervix.
Y
Y
Chatelier
D000328:Adult; D000075202:Contraindications; D004868:Equipment Failure; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007239:Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000382:microbiology; D007434:Intrauterine Devices / Q000009:adverse effects; D009819:Office Visits / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010298:Parity; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D012189:Retrospective Studies
Dix ans d'expérience du Nova T en pratique de ville. A propos d'une série de 630 cas.