Comparison of therapeutic activity of fluconazole and itraconazole in the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis in AIDS patients: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study.
The aim of this study was to assess the role and therapeutic efficacy of two azole antifungal drugs, fluconazole and itraconazole, in the treatment of endoscopically-diagnosed Candida oesophagitis in patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The study considered 120 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive patients (67 males and 53 females, mean age 27 +/- 5) at their first episode of oesophageal candidiasis diagnosed by endoscopy (Kodsi's grade II endoscopic classification). The patients were double-blindly randomized into 2 groups of 60 patients each according to the pharmacological therapy administered: a) the patients in the first group received fluconazole (100 mg b.i.d. per os); b) the patients in the second group received itraconazole (100 mg b.i.d. per os). In order to evaluate the efficacy of the pharmacological therapy, a clinical examination was performed every week up to the end of the follow-up period (2 months); endoscopic examination was performed at the end of pharmacological treatment (3 weeks). All patients selected for the study gave their informed consent. Complete remission of endoscopic lesions was observed in 45 patients (75%) in the fluconazole group and in 23 patients (38%) in the itraconazole group (p < 0.001); partial remission of endoscopic lesions was observed in 15 patients (25%) in the fluconazole group and in 28 patients (47%) in the itraconazole group (p < 0.05). No response was observed in 9 patients (15%) in the itraconazole group. Complete clinical remission was observed in 47 patients (78%) in the fluconazole group and in 44 patients (73%) in the itraconazole group (p = n.s.); partial clinical remission was observed in 13 patients (22%) in the fluconazole group and in 12 patients (20%) in the itraconazole group (p =- m.s.). No clinical response was observed in 4 patients (7%) in the itraconazole group. No side-effects worthy of note were observed in the patients of either treatment group. The results of this study demonstrated that fluconazole is associated with higher rates of endoscopic and clinical cure than itraconazole, with a statistically significant difference as regards endoscopic cure. Both drugs appear to be safe and well tolerated. Nevertheless, further controlled clinical investigations are needed to improve our knowledge of the therapeutic action of antifungal drugs in the treatment of Candida oesophagitis in HIV disease.
Barbaro
G
G
Dipartimento di Medicina di Urgenza, Università degli Studi, La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy.
Di Lorenzo
G
G
D017088:AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*; D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Q000150:complications*; D000328:Adult; D000935:Antifungal Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002177:Candidiasis / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004941:Esophagitis / Q000150:complications / Q000382:microbiology*; D005260:Female; D015725:Fluconazole / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D017964:Itraconazole / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male
D000935:Antifungal Agents; D017964:Itraconazole; D015725:Fluconazole