Synaptic mechanisms of cortical representational plasticity: somatosensory and corticocortical EPSPs in reorganized raccoon SI cortex.
1. Reorganizations of representational maps have been described for a variety of sensory and motor regions of cerebral neocortex in several species. The purpose of this study was to investigate synaptic mechanisms of the reorganizations of primary somatosensory cortex that follow removal of a digit or the joining of two digits into a syndactyly. We examined neurons in the cortical representation of digit 4 (d4). Intracellular recording was used to compare somatosensory and corticocortical excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in normal raccoons, with EPSPs recorded in two experimental groups of animals surviving for a mean of 22 wk after removal of d4, or union of d4 with digit 3 (d3). 2. In normal animals with d4 intact, EPSPs were evoked from this on-focus digit in 100% of cortical neurons. EPSPs were evoked from d3 and digit 5 (off-focus digits) in only a minority of neurons in normal raccoons. The incidence of somatosensory EPSPs from off-focus digits increased dramatically after removal of d4 or its union with d3. Latencies of EPSPs evoked from off-focus digits decreased after d4 removal, so that they were as short as latencies from d4 in normal animals. In contrast, for the group of animals with d3-d4 syndactyly, latencies of EPSPs from off-focus digits were not shorter than responses from these digits in normal animals. 3. Corticocortical EPSPs were no more common in animals with d4 removed than in intact animals. Furthermore, corticocortical EPSPs after d4 removal did not differ in their latencies, amplitudes, half-widths, or integrated amplitudes. The only detected change was that corticocortical EPSPs had faster rising phases after removal of d4. In contrast, after d3-d4 syndactyly, corticocortical EPSPs were more common than in normal animals. 4. Digit removal and digital syndactyly had distinctive effects on somatosensory and corticocortical EPSPs. These results do not identify unique synaptic mechanisms for cortical representational plasticity, nor do they specify the involved CNS site(s). Several synaptic mechanisms consistent with the results are considered in the DISCUSSION, including synaptic proliferation to form new synaptic connections and enhanced effectiveness of existing corticocortical synapses.
Zarzecki
P
P
Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Witte
S
S
Smits
E
E
Gordon
D C
DC
Kirchberger
P
P
Rasmusson
D D
DD
D000344:Afferent Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology*; D005073:Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory / Q000502:physiology; D005552:Forelimb / Q000294:innervation; D009416:Nerve Regeneration / Q000502:physiology*; D009473:Neuronal Plasticity / Q000502:physiology*; D011821:Raccoons; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013003:Somatosensory Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology*