[Enamel damage depending on the method of bracket removal].
Two different methods of removing brackets, on the one side by torsion and on the other by bending, were compared for the purpose of analyzing the respective enamel lesions. Each test group consisted of 19 extracted human molars with metal brackets attached to the molars by means of the "concise etching technique". Bracket removal was standardized through the use of a Wolpert "Universalprüfmaschine TZZ 707" with modified torsion and bending mechanism. A scanning electron microscope was used to analyze the enamel surface. When using the torsion method, the mean extension of the enamel lesions was 48.3% of the adhesive free enamel surface. These lesions often reached into the deeper enamel layers and were mainly to be found on the broad side of the bonded area. On the other hand, when using the bending method, the enamel lesions were less frequent. They were mainly superficial and were confined almost exclusively to the pressure zones. The stress required to remove the brackets and the stress distribution were calculated on mechanical models and these results corresponded well with the enamel lesions observed on the molars. It can thus be concluded that the method of removing brackets is clinically relevant in relation to enamel lesions.
Fischer-Brandies
H
H
Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel.
Kremers
L
L
Reicheneder
C
C
Kluge
G
G
Hüsler
K
K
D017005:Dental Debonding / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000293:injuries* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D016910:Orthodontic Brackets; D013499:Surface Properties
Uber die Schmelzchädigung in Abhängigkeit von der Methode der Bracketentfernung.