Scientific dishonesty and good scientific practice.
Scientific dishonesty has been the subject of much public interest in recent years. Although the problem has had a low profile in Denmark, there is no reason to believe that it is non-existent. Several preconditions known to be important prevail here as well as in other countries, such as pressure to publish and severe competition for research grants and senior academic positions. The Danish Medical Research Council (DMRC) decided to respond to this problem by preparing a report on scientific dishonesty with suggestions to the research institutions on rules for good scientific practice and procedures for investigation of suspected dishonesty. To this end, an investigatory system was suggested. The system should consist of two regional committees and one national committee. They should be headed by high court judges and experienced health sciences researchers as members. The committees will investigate cases reported to them and conclude on whether dishonesty has been established and on whether the scientific work should be retracted. Sanctions shall remain the task of the institutions. Preventive measures comprise open access to and a long storage period for scientific data.
Andersen
D
D
Surgical Department K, Odense Hospital, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen.
Axelsen
N H
NH
Riis
P
P
D003718:Denmark; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D015871:Scientific Misconduct; D014481:United States