Respiratory health status in swine producers using respiratory protective devices.
A cross-sectional survey on respiratory health in swine producers showed that 30% of 301 examined men usually used a dust mask when working inside a barn. They did not differ significantly from dust mask nonusers in respect to respiratory symptoms and lung function. This analysis was undertaken to determine whether the respiratory health of dust mask users was associated with reasons why they had started individual respiratory protection. The subjects were recontacted in order to identify those who started using a mask to deliberately prevent symptoms (42 men) and those who started protection because of pre-existing respiratory symptoms (44 men). Not unexpectedly, between-group comparisons of respiratory symptoms and lung function suggest that swine producers who wear dust masks for preventive purposes have better respiratory health than those who wear dust masks because of symptoms or those who do not use individual respiratory protection. The individual reasons for starting dust mask usage should be examined among potential determinants of the outcomes of prospective studies which can then provide more valid assessment of the effect of individual respiratory protection.
Zejda
J E
JE
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Hurst
T S
TS
Barber
E M
EM
Rhodes
C
C
Dosman
J A
JA
D000328:Adult; D000382:Agricultural Workers' Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011322:Primary Prevention; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests; D012134:Respiratory Protective Devices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012140:Respiratory Tract Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D012525:Saskatchewan / Q000453:epidemiology; D013552:Swine