Impact of cyclophosphamide on relationships between carboplatin exposure and response or toxicity when used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVE
To determine (1) the impact of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on previously defined relationships between carboplatin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and indices of toxicity and response in women with advanced ovarian cancer; and (2) the relationships between indices of cumulative drug exposure and clinical outcomes.


METHODS
Carboplatin AUC = dose/(creatinine clearance [CCr] + 25) and was calculated in 224 women who received carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The likelihood of grade 3 or greater myelotoxicity at any carboplatin AUC was compared with the likelihood of myelotoxicity at the same single-agent carboplatin AUC. The nadir count predicted using the University of Maryland single-agent carboplatin dosing formula was compared with the nadir count observed. Received and relative-received dose-intensity were calculated. Carboplatin exposure-intensity was defined by substituting cumulative carboplatin exposure for total dose. Relationships were sought between these indices and therapeutic outcomes.


RESULTS
The incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia at any carboplatin AUC was greater for the two-drug combination than for single-agent carboplatin. The platelet nadir in 83% of patients was less than or equal to the nadir predicted for the same single-agent carboplatin AUC. Despite a narrow range of received dose-intensities, carboplatin exposure-intensity was distributed over a twofold range. There were no relationships between received and relative-received dose-intensity or carboplatin exposure-intensity and time to progression or survival.


CONCLUSIONS
Any carboplatin AUC when administered with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 produces greater myelotoxicity than the same AUC of single-agent carboplatin. Received carboplatin dose-intensity underestimates the range of plasma drug exposure resulting from a fixed carboplatin dosing regimen. Whether higher carboplatin exposures can improve outcome requires prospective validation.
Reyno
L M
LM
Division of Developmental Therapeutics, University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore 21201.
Egorin
M J
MJ
Canetta
R M
RM
Jodrell
D I
DI
Swenerton
K D
KD
Pater
J L
JL
Burroughs
J N
JN
Novak
M J
MJ
Sridhara
R
R
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016190:Carboplatin / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D003520:Cyclophosphamide / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007970:Leukopenia / Q000139:chemically induced; D008875:Middle Aged; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000473:pathology; D013921:Thrombocytopenia / Q000139:chemically induced
D003520:Cyclophosphamide; D016190:Carboplatin