Fine-needle biopsy techniques of aspiration versus capillary in head and neck masses.
Fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle capillary biopsy techniques were compared, and the number of samples necessary to assure a diagnostic specimen was determined. In this study, each mass served as its own control, since both aspiration and capillary fine-needle biopsy were performed randomly on each mass. The study found the number of "superior" slides to be evenly distributed between the two biopsy techniques, but a different preference, based on tumor type, was noted for one or the other technique. The "best" slides were obtained from one of the first four samples 92% of the time. The authors concluded that both fine-needle aspiration and capillary biopsy should be used and that three to four samples should be obtained to increase the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.
Hamaker
R A
RA
Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, USA.
Moriarty
A T
AT
Hamaker
R C
RC
D001707:Biopsy, Needle / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D001769:Blood; D003581:Cytodiagnosis; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D009339:Needles; D013396:Suction / Q000295:instrumentation; D013594:Syringes