Prescriptive authority for advanced practice nurses: current and future perspectives.
OBJECTIVE
To present an overview of the issues related to prescriptive authority and advanced practice nurses (APNs) in oncology.


METHODS
Professional journals and books, print media, and professional and government releases.


RESULTS
Discussion of issues related to complex political, educational, economic, and healthcare environmental factors. Strategies to achieve increased recognition for APN prescriptive authority include increasing APNs' knowledge about the effects of the political process on prescriptive authority, educating legislators and consumers, promoting standardization of pharmacology curricula, and encouraging formation of coalitions.


CONCLUSIONS
Failure to pass a national healthcare plan, escalating managed-care markets, and the reform efforts of individual states to forge their own healthcare initiatives will challenge the APN's ability to practice and prescribe.


CONCLUSIONS
The subject of prescriptive authority highlights the controversies and debates that APNs encounter in a dynamic healthcare environment. These include the complexity of state-to-state regulations, non-nursing professions making key decisions regarding scope of practice and prescriptive authority, and the challenge for APNs to carve out new roles while overcoming state regulatory inconsistencies and market-reform barriers. If not resolved, these issues will continue to prevent qualified APNs from providing appropriate and comprehensive care to patients with cancer.
McDermott
K C
KC
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
D011307:Drug Prescriptions; D018166:Health Care Reform; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008119:Lobbying; D009720:Nurse Clinicians / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009722:Nurse Practitioners / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011057:Politics; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D014481:United States