Distal stem design and the torsional stability of cementless femoral stems.
In cementless hip arthroplasty, the fit between the implant and the endosteal cavity is a critical determinant of implant stability. Although cementless implants may be stabilized through proximal fit within the metaphysis, many surgeons rely on diaphyseal fixation to provide the necessary resistance to rotational forces, especially in revision hip arthroplasty. The cross-sectional design of the femoral stem at the level of the femoral isthmus was investigated with respect to its effect on the rotational stability of the bone-stem interface. Four cross-sectional designs--a fluted stem, a finned stem, a porous-coated stem, and a slotted fluted stem--were implanted in 12 cadaveric femurs and loaded in torsion. A knurled stem, cemented into each specimen at the conclusion of testing, acted as a control stem. The torque required to cause 100 microns of displacement at the bone stem-interface ranged from 13.7 +/- 0.8 N-m with the porous-coated design to 30.1 +/- 3.7 N-m with the fluted design (P < .0001). Intermediate values of 19.5 +/- 1.4 and 19.9 +/- 2.3 N-m were observed with the finned and slotted fluted designs, respectively. In all of the cemented control stems, failure occurred at the bone-cement interface at an average torque of 34.0 +/- 3.0 N-m. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the porous-coated, finned, and slotted fluted designs were all significantly weaker in torsion than the cemented control stem; however, there was no significant difference between the torsional resistance of the solid fluted (unslotted) and cemented stems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Kendrick
J B
JB
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Noble
P C
PC
Tullos
H S
HS
D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002102:Cadaver; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005269:Femur; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012399:Rotation