title: Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.
abstract: In a study of 11 dogs, we assessed whether the defibrillation energy requirements of a single transvenous right ventricular electrode/defibrillator can system depended on the can size. We compared the defibrillation threshold obtained with 65% fixed-tilt biphasic shocks with 20, 40, and 80 ml surface area defibrillator cans. The energy was delivered between a right ventricular coil inserted through the jugular vein and the can placed in the subcutaneous tissue of the left superior chest wall. The testing order of each can size was randomly determined. Triplicate defibrillation thresholds were obtained with each can. Despite a higher impedance (20 ml 85 +/- 22 ohms vs 80 ml 71 +/- 16 ohms, p < 0.01), the 20 ml can resulted in a similar defibrillation threshold compared with the 80 ml (20 ml 7.6 +/- 2.8 J vs 80 ml 7.5 +/- 3.4 J) and the 40 ml cans (20 ml 7.6 +/- 2.8 J vs 7.5 +/- 3.4 J). In conclusion, with the unipolar lead system the can size does not appear to be a factor limiting defibrillation success. Even a can the size of a pacemaker does not appear to significantly affect the defibrillation efficacy of this lead system.
authors.affiliation: Duke University/Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
authors.forename: K H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Newby
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Moredock
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rembert
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Wharton
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Natale
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable; D004285:Dogs; D004554:Electric Countershock / Q000379:methods; D017097:Electric Impedance; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D004867:Equipment Design