title: [Overview, analysis and evaluation of the 1995 public health structural law and the federal social care law from the viewpoint of the trauma surgery department of a university clinic. Measures for preparation of a new reimbursement system and documentation requirements].
abstract: All doctors in Germany are required to cooperate in the implementation of the health system reform and the new system for reimbursement of the hospitals to limit the negative consequences to the patients. It would be absolutely wrong to leave the medical services of the insurance companies to define the diagnosis-related groups and determine the charges. The revision of the health system is beneficial in that it supports the economical independence of hospital departments. It is a good idea for them to be paid by results; however, there are no established methods of measuring results or efficacy in medicine. Germany is about 10 years behind the USA in this, so that our country is not yet ready for this reform. Hospital departments do have the freedom to make economic decisions, being heavily dependent on the insurances and the government, because most people who work in hospital are paid from these sources. Departments of trauma or orthopaedic surgery are disadvantaged by the reform, because of the number and kind of diagnosis related groups and the method of reimbursement. This leads to a profit-oriented system of medical documentation, with possible upcoding of diagnoses in future. The present health reform most probably will not increase the efficiency of hospitals; it will not be possible to attain cost reductions with the same level of medical care. The reduced reimbursement will force doctors to cut down their expenses and restrict diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. On the other hand the administration sector in hospitals and insurances will expand dramatically in future.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
authors.affiliation: Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Philipps-Universität-Marburg.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Feld
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Künneke
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Beisswenger
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Opitz
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Berghöfer
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gotzen
mesh_terms: D003363:Cost Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004282:Documentation / Q000379:methods*; D005858:Germany; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*
vernacular_title: Uberblick, Analyse und Bewertung des Gesundheitsstrukturgesetzes und der Bundespflegesatzverordnung 1995 aus der Sicht der Unfallchirurgischen Abteilung eines Universitätsklinikums. Massnahmen zur Vorbereitung der neuen Entgeltsysteme und Dokumentationspflichten.