title: Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain.
abstract: Meta-analytic procedures were used to determine the relation between disability compensation and pain. Of the 157 relevant identified studies, only 32 contained quantifiable data from treatment and control groups. The majority of these exclusively examined chronic low back pain patients (72%). Overall, 136 comparisons were obtained, on the basis of 3,802 pain patients and 3,849 controls. Liberal procedures for estimating effect sizes (ESs) yielded an ES of .60 (p < .0002). Conservative procedures yielded an ES of .48 (p < .0005). Both ESs differed from zero, indicating that compensation is related to increased reports of pain and decreased treatment efficacy. These results are interpreted in light of current models of pain. Health policy implications are also discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68588-0308, USA.
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Rohling
authors.forename: L M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Binder
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Langhinrichsen-Rohling
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001416:Back Pain / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy; D002908:Chronic Disease; D005260:Female; D005380:Financing, Government; D006801:Humans; D007342:Insurance Benefits; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009497:Neurotic Disorders / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology; D010146:Pain / Q000191:economics* / Q000523:psychology; D059408:Pain Management; D011336:Probability; D014481:United States; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence