Perception and acceptance of technological and environmental risks: why are poor countries less concerned?
The research has been aimed at answering two questions: (1) What factors impact perception and acceptance of technological and environmental hazards? (2) Why are rich societies involved more in protecting their environment and health than poor societies? Data has been collected from representative samples of two countries--Poland and Sweden. The results indicate that (1) contrary to earlier findings, the inverse relations between perceived benefits and dangers of hazards has not been observed, (2) acceptance of a risk has been mostly influenced by perceived benefits, (3) rejection of a risk has been mostly influenced by its perceived harmful consequences. Concerning the second question, it has been found that: (1) perceived hazard's danger and benefit is not the only factor that impacts its acceptance, and (2) a broader economic context can impact acceptance (tolerance) of hazards. It has been found that being aware of high dangers and not very high benefits of hazardous activities, Poles still have accepted them. Thus, Poles seem to follow an old proverb: "When one does not have what one likes, one has to like what one has."
Sokolowska
J
J
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Tyszka
T
T
D000328:Adult; D000383:Agriculture; D001290:Attitude; D001336:Automobiles; D002617:Chemical Industry; D003031:Coal; D019049:Developed Countries; D003906:Developing Countries; D004467:Economics; D004777:Environment; D004787:Environmental Pollution; D006801:Humans; D010465:Perception; D011044:Poland; D011203:Poverty; D011210:Power Plants; D012306:Risk; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012309:Risk-Taking; D013548:Sweden; D013672:Technology; D018505:Waste Management; D014866:Waste Products
D003031:Coal; D014866:Waste Products