Management of labour in an isolated rural maternity hospital.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the use of a maternity unit run by general practitioners and midwives, describing the outcome of labour in an unselected group of women and quantifying the contribution made by general practitioners.


METHODS
Retrospective population based review of obstetric patients who had access to an isolated rural maternity unit.


METHODS
Rural area 120 km from a consultant maternity unit.


METHODS
997 consecutive women delivered between January 1987 and May 1991.


METHODS
Mode of delivery and complications by place of booking and place of delivery; need for medical intervention and transfer.


RESULTS
530 women (53%) were booked for delivery in the rural unit; this group had a caesarean section rate of 3.8% and an unplanned transfer rate of 12.8% to the consultant unit in labour. Of the 462 who delivered in the low risk unit, 25 (5%) required a forceps delivery; postnatal complications requiring emergency medical support occurred in a further 33 (7%).


CONCLUSIONS
Risk characterisation is possible, but medical support from general practitioners and obstetricians is required in almost a third of women at low risk for complications of delivery. Results of this study support the team approach to obstetric management but not the move towards isolated units without organised medical support.
Baird
A G
AG
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol.
Jewell
D
D
Walker
J J
JJ
D002585:Cesarean Section; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006771:Hospitals, Maternity; D006801:Humans; D007743:Labor, Obstetric; D008427:Maternal Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007744:Obstetric Labor Complications / Q000628:therapy; D010360:Patient Transfer; D011247:Pregnancy; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D019035:Rural Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012606:Scotland; D016526:Workload