title: Influence of phototherapy treatment duration for seasonal affective disorder: outcome at one vs. two weeks.
abstract: Most previous phototherapy research has been conducted on trials of 1 week duration. This study compares response to phototherapy at weeks 1 and 2. All subjects (n = 26) were between 18 and 65 years and met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed, revised, (DSM III-R) criteria for major depression, recurrent, seasonal pattern and had a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HAM-D) > or = 20. A rater blinded to treatment schedule and study hypothesis repeated the HAM-D-31 1 and 2 weeks after baseline to assess treatment response to bright light. Response rates at week 1 defined by 50% reduction in HAM-D-31 and HAM-D-31 score < 8 were 62% and 27%, respectively. At week 2, however, 65% had a 50% reduction in HAM-D-31 and 62% had a HAM-D-31 < score 8 (chi-square = 6, p = 0.01). Four patients (15%) who were nonresponders at week 1 responded after 2 weeks. The results show a statistically different outcome after 2 weeks of treatment and suggest the necessity of longer trials of phototherapy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Labbate
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lafer
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thibault
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Rosenbaum
authors.forename: G S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Sachs
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010789:Phototherapy; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D012008:Recurrence; D016574:Seasonal Affective Disorder / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome