The evolution of FDA policy on silicone breast implants: a case study of politics, bureaucracy, and business in the process of decision-making.
The central issue facing federal regulation of breast implants is that while such devices are not functionally necessary or needed for survival, the side effects may be harmful and have not been proven unharmful. The Medical Device Amendments of 1976 appear to require such evidence prior to the FDA permitting the unrestricted marketing of these devices. However, only recently have such requirements been imposed by the FDA. The author examines the FDA's decision-making process, particularly as applied to silicone breast implants, and the factors that appears to have affected such decisions. In pursuing this study, the activities of a number of interest-group actors, as well as congressional responses and the role of federal bureaucratic actors, were examined. In 1992, the FDA established a regulatory protocol that effectively withdrew most silicone breast implants from the market for the purpose of breast augmentation and allows for the monitoring of the impact of new implants on women's health. This increase concern for determining the safety of breast implants is due to a number of factors, which are examined in this article.
Palley
H A
HA
School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201, USA.
D018427:Breast Implants / Q000009:adverse effects*; D003257:Consumer Product Safety / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003657:Decision Making; D018795:Device Approval / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D012828:Silicones / Q000009:adverse effects*; D014481:United States; D014486:United States Food and Drug Administration / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016387:Women's Health
D012828:Silicones