Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
When subjects study a list of B items paired with A items and are tested for recognition of the B items alone, and then for recall of the B items given the A items as cues, B items that can be recalled frequently go unrecognised. The extent of this recognition failure is predictable from a function discovered by Tulving and Wiseman (1975), which relates the probability of recognising the recallable items to the probability of recognising all items. Two kinds of exceptions to this function have been discovered: encoding exceptions and retrieval exceptions. Very few observations of retrieval exceptions exist. Four experiments described in this article provide further evidence that such exceptions occur when the B items are categorised and the A items are the names of the categories. According to a contextual account of the function and exceptions to it, these retrieval exceptions occur because the information provided by the A-item cues can be largely retrieved from the B items in the recognition test; hence, as cues, the A items do not provide much different contextual information to that provided by the B items. By this account, the function is an empirical law; exceptions fall outside the range of this law and define its boundary conditions.
Gardiner
J M
JM
Psychology Department, City University, London, UK.
Mäntylä
T
T
Nilsson
L G
LG
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D014706:Verbal Learning