Cost analysis of propofol versus thiopental induction anesthesia in outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
This study investigated the cost of propofol versus thiopental anesthesia in 243 patients who underwent outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Patients records were analyzed for medication use, duration of surgery, anesthesia, recovery room stay, and associated costs. Despite the higher drug cost for propofol, the total mean cost was $273.00 less per patient for patients receiving propofol induction anesthesia. Extension of these data translates into cost savings of approximately $7900.00 if propofol had been used for all patients. Although the duration of surgery for the propofol group was shorter by nearly 12 minutes, the anesthesia duration and recovery room stay were both longer for the thiopental group, reflecting the longer duration of action of thiopental. Although the realized cost savings of drugs, surgery, anesthesia, and recovery time when propofol versus thiopental is used for outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery are relatively small on an individual patient basis, cost savings may become more significant if larger patient populations are studied.
Wagner
B K
BK
College of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
O'Hara
D A
DA
D000328:Adult; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics*; D000758:Anesthesia / Q000191:economics*; D000762:Anesthesia Recovery Period; D005260:Female; D005836:Genitalia, Female / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics*; D015742:Propofol / Q000191:economics*; D011997:Recovery Room / Q000191:economics; D013874:Thiopental / Q000191:economics*
D013874:Thiopental; D015742:Propofol