title: Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable?
abstract: Ethicists argue that deception is unacceptable, whereas researchers regard it as a necessary part of (certain kinds of) research. This impasse could be resolved by establishing the specific conditions under which deception in medical and behavioral research can be tolerated. An approach based on a consideration of the "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct," one of the few writings on this topic, would satisfy the needs of both parties. It takes the form of a requirement that subjects be informed of the use of deception before enrolling in a deceptive study. This "second order consent" approach to acceptable deception represents our best chance for reconciling respect for subjects with the occasional scientific need for deceptive research.
authors.affiliation: Bioethics Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wendler
mesh_terms: D035841:Behavioral Research; D032781:Codes of Ethics; D008192:Deception; D030881:Disclosure; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D033281:Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011586:Psychology, Clinical / Q000592:standards; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards; D035842:Research Subjects; D018570:Risk Assessment