When drug treatment in the elderly is not cost effective. An ethical dilemma in an environment of healthcare rationing.
In light of moves towards the view that rationing of healthcare resources is inevitable, the question arises as to whether age is a relevant consideration. To hold age as relevant in this context attracts the charge of agism; however, age may be related to some other characteristic(s) that are pertinent. In the context of drug treatment of the elderly, there is evidence to suggest that there are important differences between older and younger patients in terms of adverse responses to drugs because of factors such as physiological changes and multiple health problems, which occur with aging. On the other hand, some studies show beneficial effects of drug therapy. There is a need for more empirical data on cost effectiveness. Ethics arguably have to take into account factors other than cost effectiveness, such as equity. A central question is whether what is required is a set of criteria in addition to cost effectiveness, or an interpretation of cost effectiveness sensitive to broader considerations, such as quality of life (QOL). In relation to the latter, the issue of age-specific measurements of QOL remains problematic.
Chadwick
R
R
Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, England.
Levitt
M
M
D000368:Aged; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004358:Drug Therapy / Q000191:economics*; D017850:Economics, Pharmaceutical; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans