[Conflicts between parenteral expectations and children's needs in child guidance clinics].
The central question of this article is whether the Law for Children and Youth Aid (Kinder- und Jugendhilfegesetz KJHG) from 1991 is justly accused of being more a Law for Parent Aid than a law in keeping with the times which also does justice to the problems and needs of children. The article especially pursues the question whether the legislator of the KJHG considers the precarious balance of a conflict between parental rights and children's welfare as required by the constitution. Whether the child's welfare is endangered in an individual case and which strategies to limit further dangers are promising can often only be answered in an interdisciplinary manner; competencies from child psychologists and child psychiatrists should be utilized more extensively to determine problems and find decisions in youth care.
Salgo
L
L
Institut für Arbeitsrecht der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt a.M.
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002651:Child Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002653:Child Behavior Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D002660:Child Guidance / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D002669:Child Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005196:Family Therapy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D012944:Social Support