Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest: a closed chest technique with equivalent myocardial protection.
Thoracoscopic cardiac surgery is presently under intense investigation. This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of closed chest cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest in comparison with standard open chest methods in a dog model. The minimally invasive closed chest group (n = 6) underwent percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac venting, as well as antegrade cardioplegic arrest through use of a specially designed percutaneous endovascular aortic occluder and cardioplegic solution delivery system. The control group (n = 6) underwent standard sternotomy and conventional open chest cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic crossclamping, and antegrade cardioplegia. Ischemic arrest time was 1 hour in each group. Ventricular pressures and sonomicrometer segment lengths were recorded before bypass and at 30 and 60 minutes after bypass. Left ventricular function did not differ significantly between the two groups, as demonstrated by measurements of elastance and end-diastolic stroke work. Also, the preload recruitable work area was 69% and 60% of baseline at 30 and 60 minutes after bypass in the minimally invasive group versus 65% and 62% in the conventional control group (p = not significant); the stroke work end-diastolic length relationship was 78% and 71% of baseline in the minimally invasive group at these intervals versus 77% and 74% in the conventional control group (p = not significant). Myocardial temperatures were similar throughout bypass in the two groups, and ultrastructural examination of prebypass and postbypass biopsy specimens showed no differences between groups. These results demonstrate that minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest is as feasible, safe, and effective as conventional open chest cardiopulmonary bypass. Thus current technology may allow wider clinical application of closed chest cardiac surgery.
Schwartz
D S
DS
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.
Ribakove
G H
GH
Grossi
E A
EA
Stevens
J H
JH
Siegel
L C
LC
St Goar
F G
FG
Peters
W S
WS
McLoughlin
D
D
Baumann
F G
FG
Colvin
S B
SB
Galloway
A C
AC
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D002315:Cardiopulmonary Bypass / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004285:Dogs; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006324:Heart Arrest, Induced / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative; D009200:Myocardial Contraction; D009206:Myocardium / Q000648:ultrastructure; D013249:Sternum / Q000601:surgery; D020708:Thoracoscopes; D013906:Thoracoscopy / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016277:Ventricular Function, Left