title: Structural comparison of two strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus subtype O1 and a laboratory antigenic variant, G67.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Foot-and-mouth disease viruses (FMDVs) are members of the picornavirus family and cause an economically important disease of cloven-hoofed animals. To understand the structural basis of antigenic variation in FMDV, we have determined the structures of two viruses closely related to strain O1BFS whose structure is known.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The two new structure are, like O1BFS, both serotype O viruses. The first, O1 Kaüfbeuren (O1K), is a field isolate dating from an outbreak of FMD in Europe in the 1960s. The second, called G67, is a quadruple mutant of O1K, generated in the laboratory, that bears point mutations conferring resistance to neutralizing by monoclonal antibodies, specific for each of the four major antigenic sites defined previously. The availability of the three related virus structures permits a detailed analysis of the way amino acid substitutions influence antigenicity. Structural changes are seen to be limited, in general, to the substituted side chain. For example, the GH loop of VP1, a highly antigenic and mobile protuberance which becomes ordered only under reducing conditions, was essentially indistinguishable in the three viruses despite the accumulation of up to four changes within its 15-residue sequence. At one of the other antigenic sites, however, changes between the two field strains did perturb both side-chain and main-chain structures in the vicinity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The conservation of conformation of the GH loop of VP1 adds to the evidence implicating an integrin as the cellular receptor for FMDV, since this loop contains a conserved RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) sequence structurally similar to the same tripeptide in some other integrin-binding proteins. Structural changes required for the virus to escape neutralization by monoclonal antibodies are generally small. The more extensive type of structural change exhibited by the field isolates probably reflects differing selective pressures operating in vivo and in vitro.
authors.affiliation: Oxford Centre for Molecular Sciences, New Chemistry Laboratory, UK.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lea
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Abu-Ghazaleh
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Blakemore
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Curry
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Fry
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Jackson
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: King
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Logan
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Newman
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Stuart
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D000956:Antigens, Viral / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics*; D005537:Aphthovirus / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000276:immunology; D002213:Capsid / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics / Q000276:immunology; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009154:Mutation; D011487:Protein Conformation
chemical_list: D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D000956:Antigens, Viral