title: Evolution of bone densitometry in patients with myeloma treated with conventional or intensive therapy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Demineralization is a common hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) that can be evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The evolution of lumbar and whole body bone density were investigated by DEXA in patients with MM treated by conventional or intensive therapy supported by autologous blood stem cell transplantation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty six patients younger than 66 years with MM were randomly assigned to either conventional (30 patients, Group A) or intensive therapy supported by autologous blood stem cell transplantation (36 patients, Group B). For all patients, lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DEXA at diagnosis and 13.2 +/- 4.2 months after the initiation of treatment. Whole body examinations were performed in 45 patients; in addition to whole body BMD, independent BMD values were recorded for various skeletal sites.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At diagnosis, mean lumbar Z score (lumbar mean BMD value) was low (-1.24 +/- 1.45) without any significant difference between the 2 groups. Under treatment, lumbar BMD increased 0.7% in Group A and 4.6% in Group B (P = 0.02). This difference was mainly related to nonresponders in group A who featured a lumbar BMD change of -3.9%, whereas patients in remission in both groups displayed a 4.1% increase (P < 0.001). There was a correlation between the variation of lumbar BMD and the decrease of the serum or urinary monoclonal component (r = 0.34, P = 0.006). After intensive therapy, increase of lumbar BMD was higher in men than in women (7.2% vs. 1%, P = 0.005) perhaps because of variations in hormonal status in women. Unexpectedly, whole body BMD decreased in responders (-3%) because of a decrease in appendicular BMD outweighing the increase in axial BMD. This suggests a redistribution from cortical to cancellous bone in patients with MM responsive to chemotherapy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Bone densitometry is a marker of treatment response that may be particularly useful in nonsecretory and light chain MM. Moreover, it provides new information on bone remodeling in patients treated for MM, which may have therapeutic consequences.
authors.affiliation: Service d'Immuno-Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Mariette
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bergot
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ravaud
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Roux
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Laval-Jeantet
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Brouet
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Fermand
mesh_terms: D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon; D000328:Adult; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D015519:Bone Density; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D018380:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000378:metabolism; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009101:Multiple Myeloma / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000378:metabolism; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012074:Remission Induction