title: [General practitioners' approach to urination disorders in men over the age of 50. A survey of 250 physicians in Brittany].
abstract: A questionnaire was set to 250 general practitioners in the Brittany region, to determine the impact of information campaigns concerning benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic cancer on their everyday approach to disorders of micturition in men over the age of 50 years. 225 questionnaires were interpretable. 75% of general practitioners systematically investigated the presence of disorders of micturition. In the presence of such symptoms, 76% of general practitioners conducted further investigations to exclude prostatic cancer. 89% of general practitioners performed first-line digital rectal examination, and 34% of them systematically performed this examination once a year. The investigations most frequently performed after digital rectal examination concerned the state of urine (50%) but only 30% of general practitioners used reagent dip-sticks and 43% ordered urine cultures. Other investigations consisted of transrectal ultrasonography (31%) an PSA assay (26%). 3% of PSA assays were ordered before digital rectal examination. Renal and vesical ultrasonography occupied 5th place, although distension of the upper urinary apparatus was a source of concern for 51% of general practitioners. In the presence of symptomatic BPH, general practitioners readily prescribed medical treatment (96%). They assessed the results of this treatment on the course of disorders of micturition (95%), digital rectal examination (91%), and PSA (50%). General practitioners are familiar with disorders of micturition after the age of 50 years. However, 25% of them do not systematically question patients about these symptoms. Digital rectal examination is now performed more frequently, although systematic examination of the prostate is rare (34%). PSA assay is not the doctor's first priority (3rd place in the list of examinations). Two examinations are rarely used and should be developed: reagent dip-sticks (30%) and renal and vesical ultrasonography (5th place). Only 4% of general practitioners did not prescribe any treatment in the case of uncomplicated BPH, which is not in line with current recommendations. There is certainly a need for better information of general practitioners, but this information is only valid when a consensus has been reached among urologists.
authors.affiliation: Service d'Urologie, C.H.R.U., Rennes.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Coeurdacier
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Staerman
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Thoquenne
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Cipolla
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Guillé
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lobel
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D005194:Family Practice / Q000193:education / Q000379:methods*; D005602:France; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000150:complications*; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014555:Urination Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology* / Q000628:therapy; D014572:Urology