title: A comparison of alternative methods of screening for dementia in clinical settings.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare 3 approaches to screening for dementia: cognitive testing, informant report, and neurovisual assessment in a clinical environment.
  
  
  METHODS
  A university hospital in Geneva, Switzerland.
  
  
  METHODS
  Subjects were 76 patients admitted to the Geriatric Hospital or outpatients assessed at the Memory Clinic of the Hospitals of the University of Geneva School of Medicine in Geneva, Switzerland. Thirty-three met criteria for dementia and 11 for depression based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised.
  
  
  METHODS
  Performance in French-language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and the Clinical Antisaccadic Eye Movement Test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All tests significantly discriminated cases of dementia from noncases. The receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly were more efficient screening measures for dementia than the Antisaccadic Eye Movement Test in this setting. Unlike the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly was unrelated to patients' educational attainment or premorbid intelligence. The previously reported strong relationship between the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Antisaccadic Eye Movement Test was not replicated in these patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both cognitive testing and informant report are efficient methods of screening for dementia in clinical settings. Factors such as sensorimotor disability or informant availability may dictate the viability of each approach in individual application. The performance of the Antisaccadic Eye Movement Test precludes recommending its use as a screen for dementia without further research into its performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geriatrics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Switzerland.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mulligan
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mackinnon
authors.forename: A F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Jorm
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Giannakopoulos
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Michel
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003704:Dementia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods*; D008609:Mental Status Schedule / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009460:Neurologic Examination / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011594:Psychometrics; D012372:ROC Curve; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D013557:Switzerland