title: Avoiding sexual harassment liability in veterinary practices.
abstract: Harassment based on gender violates the rule of workplace equality established by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and enforced by the EEOC. In 1986, the US Supreme Court, in Meritor Savings Bank v Vinson, established the criteria that must be met for a claim of hostile environment sexual harassment to be considered valid. Plaintiffs must show that they were subjected to conduct based on their gender, that it was unwelcome, and that it was severe and pervasive enough to alter their condition of employment, resulting in an abusive working environment. There have been few sexual harassment cases involving veterinary professionals, and it is our goal to help keep the number of filed actions to a minimum. The most effective way to avoid hostile environment sexual harassment claims is to confront the issue openly and to adopt a sexual harassment policy for the practice. When it comes to sexual harassment, an ounce of prevention is unquestionably worth a pound of cure.
authors.affiliation: University of Pennsylvania Law School, Whitehouse, NJ 08888, USA.
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Lacroix
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Wilson
mesh_terms: D017750:Animal Technicians; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008297:Male; D017406:Sexual Harassment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control; D014481:United States; D014730:Veterinary Medicine