title: Randomized comparison of ultrasonic aspiration versus conventional electrocautery for dissection of the human internal thoracic artery.
abstract: The most common technique currently employed to harvest the internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting is conventional electrocautery. This study compared an alternative method, electrocautery with an ultrasonic aspirator, for harvesting the internal thoracic artery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of six experimental groups (conventional electrocautery, ultrasonic aspirator at settings of 60%, 80%, and 100% power output, and ultrasonic aspirator in 100% CAVI-Pulse modes 1 and 3). Ring segments of internal thoracic artery were studied in an organ bath. Contraction responses were elicited with 123 mmol/L potassium physiologic salt solution, KPSS, KPSS solution containing noradrenaline, and a cumulative noradrenaline dose-contraction curve. Relaxation studies were performed with the vasodilators acetylcholine, bradykinin, and sodium nitroprusside. Forty percent of the electrocauterized vessels were traumatized or damaged and failed to respond to contractile stimuli, whereas only 10% of the vessels in ultrasonic aspirator groups 60%, 80%, and 100% failed to respond. All vessels in the group harvested by ultrasonic aspirator in 100% CAVI-Pulse mode 1 responded, whereas 20% of the vessels in the group harvested by ultrasonic aspirator in 100% CAVI-Pulse mode 3 failed to respond. All settings of electrocautery with an ultrasonic aspirator produced a greater contractile response to KPSS and noradrenaline. Acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside produced similar relaxations in all groups, but the bradykinin responses were significantly improved in all groups undergoing 100% electrocautery with an ultrasonic aspirator. These results suggest that 100% electrocautery with an ultrasonic aspirator, particularly in 100% CAVI-Pulse mode 1, resulted in less damage and trauma than conventional electrocautery during harvesting of the internal thoracic artery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: K L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Blake
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Watt
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: A C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: De Souza
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Spyt
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Thurston
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004564:Electrocoagulation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006085:Graft Survival / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013396:Suction / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013895:Thoracic Arteries / Q000293:injuries / Q000637:transplantation*; D014021:Tissue Preservation; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014464:Ultrasonic Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014661:Vasoconstriction / Q000502:physiology; D014664:Vasodilation / Q000502:physiology