title: A functional model of nerve repair. Reanastomosis vs entubulation repair.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare reanastomosis and entubulation repair after transection of the peroneal nerve in rats with the use of 2 functional models: gait analysis and a tension transduction device.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, randomized, blinded control study. Each animal served as its own control. The injured site was alternated between the left and the right. Gait analysis was evaluated in a blind fashion at postoperative weeks 1, 3, 7, and 13, and the tension transduction device at week 13, for injured and uninjured legs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Animals underwent unilateral peroneal nerve transection injury, half with entubulation and half with end-to-end reanastomosis repair.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nerve transection was performed 6 mm proximal to the anterior tibialis muscle insertion followed by reanastomosis (epineurial suture placement to align the sectioned nerve ends) or entubulation (placement of nerve ends into a 4-mm-long sterile Silastic tube secured with 2 epineurial sutures).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Gait analysis demonstrated a poorer ankle angle in all injured legs compared with uninjured legs at each postoperative period. Ankle angles for reanastomosis were statistically better than those for entubulation at weeks 3, 7, and 13. The tension transduction device demonstrated poorer force in injured than uninjured animals at 13 weeks. Reanastomosis repair groups demonstrated no difference in force development compared with entubulation repair groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Reanastomosis of the transected rat peroneal nerve demonstrated improved functional return by gait analysis when compared with entubulation-repaired nerves at postoperative weeks 3, 7, and 13. Force development of injured nerve groups measured by the tension transduction device was decreased compared with control, but no difference was detected between the 2 repair methods. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible functional benefit of reanastomosis.
authors.affiliation: Division of Otolaryngology, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, USA.
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Shirley
authors.forename: S L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Covey
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Santos
mesh_terms: D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000379:methods; D000758:Anesthesia / Q000379:methods; D000818:Animals; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000295:instrumentation; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait; D010543:Peroneal Nerve / Q000293:injuries / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery*; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011897:Random Allocation; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D014160:Transducers, Pressure
chemical_list: D012826:Silicone Elastomers