Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of food aid grain delivery.
Grain food aid averages 13 million tons per year. Donors have a duty to deliver food aid grain in an adequate and acceptable condition at least cost. This paper reviews commodity procurement, packaging, inspection, shipping and storage with regard to overall quality assurance and cost-effectiveness. Experience at ports of loading and discharge and in food aid delivery programmes indicates that sufficient attention is rarely paid to quality assurance and loss minimisation. Grain procurement specifications that are normally appropriate for safe handling and storage in temperate climates, particularly moisture content, are commonly inappropriate for tropical climates. The technology for safe delivery of food aid grain is well established but not always implemented. Procurement of food aid grain in developing countries has increased recently, creating a need to improve operational and management aspects of tendering and quality assurance procedures. Such purchases entail potential cost savings but are associated with lengthening delivery lead times for non-urgent consignments. Although woven polypropylene sacks are cheaper to buy than jute ones, the losses associated with handling and storage problems indicate that jute sacks are preferable for food aid delivery.
Walker
D J
DJ
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, Kent.
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003906:Developing Countries; D002523:Edible Grain; D005511:Food Handling / Q000191:economics; D005513:Food Inspection / Q000191:economics; D005519:Food Preservation / Q000191:economics; D005522:Food Services / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000191:economics; D012066:Relief Work / Q000191:economics*