Inactivation of virus during anaerobic digestion of manure in laboratory scale biogas reactors.
Reduction of porcine parvovirus, bovine enterovirus and faecal enterococci were measured in biogas reactors continuously run on manure and manure supplemented with household waste at 35 degrees C and 55 degrees C and in batch test run at 70 degrees C. The aim of the experiments was to study the sanitation effect of anaerobic digestion and to evaluate the use of faecal enterococci as an indicator of sanitation. Parallel studies on the reduction of virus and faecal enterococci were done in physiological saline solution. Heat inactivation was found to be an important factor in thermophilic biogas plants and the overall dominant factor at 70 degrees C. However, other environmental factors with a substantial virucidal and bactericidal effect were involved in inactivation. The death rates for faecal enterococci were generally higher than for porcine parvovirus and lower than for bovine enterovirus. For faecal enterococci, a logarithmic reduction of 4 (corresponding to the recommended minimum guaranteed retention time) was obtained after 300 hours at 35 degrees C and after 1-2 hours at 55 degrees C. In continuously-fed reactors, a high reduction rate was initially seen for the virus tested, followed by a reduction in the rate. For porcine parvovirus, a minimum guaranteed retention time of 11-12 hours is necessary at 55 degrees C in the initial phase (0-4 hours) and 54 hours hereafter (4-48 h). Correspondingly, for bovine enterovirus a MGRT of 23 hours was necessary at 35 degrees C and < 0.5 hours at 55 degrees C. The data indicate that faecal enterococci measurements give a good indication of inactivation of enterovirus and other more heat sensitive virus, especially under thermophilic conditions. Parvovirus is very suitable for comparative investigations on inactivation in the temperature range of 50-80 degrees C, due to the extreme thermal resistance of this virus. However, in stipulating sanitation demands for biogas reactors it seems more reasonable to use less resistant virus, such as a reovirus or picornavirus, which better represents the pathogenic animal virus.
Lund
B
B
Danish Technological Institute, Department of Biotechnology, Taastrup, Denmark.
Jensen
V F
VF
Have
P
P
Ahring
B
B
D000693:Anaerobiosis; D000818:Animals; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D001709:Biotechnology; D002417:Cattle; D016983:Enterococcus; D004770:Enterovirus; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology / Q000821:virology*; D005740:Gases; D006358:Hot Temperature; D006801:Humans; D017992:Parvovirus; D012037:Refuse Disposal / Q000379:methods*; D012498:Sanitary Engineering; D013552:Swine
D005740:Gases