title: The empirical status of the clinical application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing.
abstract: The published reports of the clinical application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) are reviewed in terms of empirical validity. Case studies, single-subject experiments and group design experiments on clinical problems are evaluated for the effectiveness of the protocol, component effects, comparative effects and treatment fidelity. Classification of disorders and measurement issues are addressed. The protocol frequently reduces verbal report and independent observer ratings of distress--strikingly in some instances. Psychophysiologic measures show little effect of treatment. There is little empirical evidence to indicate the effect of treatment on motoric or behavioral indices. Eye movements do not appear to be an essential component of treatment, and there have been no substantial comparisons with other treatments. No studies have adequately controlled for nonspecific (placebo) effects of treatment. Suggestions are made for applying improved methodological controls for future applications of EMDR to clinical disorders.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Lohr
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Kleinknecht
authors.forename: D F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Tolin
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Barrett
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003887:Desensitization, Psychologic; D005133:Eye Movements; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D013313:Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*