title: Differences in hydration state of nucleus and cytoplasm of the amphibian oocyte.
abstract: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) microimaging and proton relaxation times were used to monitor differences between the hydration state of the nucleus and cytoplasm in the Rana pipiens oocyte. Individual isolated ovarian oocytes were imaged in a drop of Ringer's solution with an in-plane resolution of 80 microm. Proton spin echo images of oocytes arrested in prophase I indicated a marked difference in contrast between nucleoplasm and cytoplasm with additional intensity gradations between the yolk platelet-rich region of the cytoplasm and regions with little yolk. Neither shortening taue (spin echo time) to 9 msec (from 18 msec) nor lengthening taur (spin recovery time) to 2 sec (from 0.5 sec) reduced the observed contrast between nucleus and cytoplasm. Water proton T1 (spin-lattice) relaxation times of oocyte suspensions indicated three water compartments that corresponded to extracellular medium (T1 = 3.0 sec), cytoplasm (T1 = 0.8 sec) and nucleoplasm (T1 = 1.6 sec). The 1.6 sec compartment disappeared at the time of nuclear breakdown. Measurements of plasma and nuclear membrane potentials with KCl-filled glass microelectrodes demonstrated that the prophase I oocyte nucleus was about 25 mV inside positive relative to the extracellular medium. A model for the prophase-arrested oocyte is proposed in which a high concentration of large impermeant ions together with small counter ions set up a Donnan-type equilibrium that results in an increased distribution of water within the nucleus in comparison with the cytosol. This study indicates: (i) a slow exchange between two or more intracellular water compartments on the NMR time-scale, (ii) an increased rotational correlation time for water molecules in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments compared to bulk water, and (iii) a higher water content (per unit dry mass) of the nucleus compared to the cytoplasm, and (iv) the existence of a large (about 75 mV positive) electropotential difference between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Morrill
authors.forename: A B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Kostellow
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Osterlow
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Gupta
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001001:Anura; D002451:Cell Compartmentation; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000378:metabolism*; D003593:Cytoplasm / Q000378:metabolism*; D005260:Female; D009682:Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; D008564:Membrane Potentials; D009865:Oocytes / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism*; D011522:Protons; D014867:Water / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D011522:Protons; D014867:Water