Use of precision profiles to evaluate precision of the automated leukocyte differential.
The commonly used methods of assessing the precision of the automated leukocyte differential have certain drawbacks that affect the validity and comparability of results. In the present report, we introduce a procedure based on building precision profiles from a large number of within-run imprecision experiments. The profiles are fitted to the function for the CV of proportions, which yields the number of theoretically differentiated leukocytes. Differences between fitted curves are evaluated for statistical significance by the F-test. As an example, we compared the precision of two hematology analyzers, a flow-cytometric technique involving fluorescence-labeled monoclonal antibodies, and the manual differential. We were able to establish definite differences in precision between different analyzers and different leukocyte classes. Our data also indicated that conventional within-run imprecision studies may completely misjudge analyzer precision. Furthermore, we could demonstrate that the precision of analyzers that analyze a fixed amount of blood rather than a fixed number of leukocytes is strongly influenced by the leukocyte count of the sample, leading to high imprecision for leukopenic samples. We believe the proposed procedure is a useful addition to currently used protocols; it yields clear results and creates a statistical basis of comparison between various instruments and techniques of differentiation.
Hübl
W
W
Central Lab, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria.
Tlustos
L
L
Bayer
P M
PM
D001322:Autoanalysis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005434:Flow Cytometry; D006405:Hematology / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007958:Leukocyte Count; D007962:Leukocytes / Q000145:classification*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity