[Results of a randomized study comparing combination of navelbine-cisplatin to combination of vindesine-cisplatin and to navelbine alone in 612 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer].
The combination of vindesine and cisplatin is considered a reference regimen in advanced NSCLC which has yielded a significant improvement in the duration of survival. A phase II study of a new semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid, Navelbine, reported an unusually high 29% response rate in stage III-IV NSCLC and a phase I-II study established the feasibility of the combination of Navelbine and cisplatin. We, therefore, designed a prospective randomized trial to compare Navelbine and cisplatin (NVB-P) to vindesine and cisplatin (VDS-P) and to evaluate whether the best of these regimens affords a survival benefit compared to Navelbine alone (NVB), an outpatient regimen. Forty-five centers included 612 patients in this study: 206 in NVB-P, 200 in VDS-P and 206 in NVB. Navelbine was given at a dose of 30 mg/m2 weekly, cisplatin at 120 mg/m2 on day 1, day 29 and then every 6 weeks and vindesine at 3 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks and then every other week. Treatment was continued until progression or toxicity. Patients' characteristics were similar in the three groups with 59% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. An objective response rate was observed in 30% of patients in NVB-P versus 19% in VDS-P (P = .02) and 14% in NVB (P < .001). The median duration of survival was 40 weeks in NVB-P compared to 32 weeks in VDS-P and 31 weeks in NVB. The comparison of survival between the three groups demonstrated an advantage for NVB-P compared to VDS-P (P = .04) and NVB (P = .02). Neutropenia was significantly higher in the NVB-P group (P < .001) and neurotoxicity more frequent with VDS-P (P < .004). Since our results have demonstrated that NVB-P yields a longer survival duration and a higher response rate than VDS-P or NVB alone, with acceptable toxicity, this combination should be considered a reference regimen in advanced NSCLC.
Le Chevalier
T
T
Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Brisgand
D
D
Pujol
J L
JL
Douillard
J Y
JY
Monnier
A
A
Rivière
A
A
Chomy
P
P
Le Groumellec
A
A
Ruffie
P
P
Gottfried
M
M
Gaspard
M H
MH
Chevreau
C
C
Alberola
V
V
Cigolari
S
S
Besson
F
F
Martinez
A
A
Besenval
M
M
Berthaud
P
P
Tursz
T
T
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology; D002945:Cisplatin / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D004361:Drug Tolerance; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010166:Palliative Care; D015996:Survival Rate; D014747:Vinblastine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D014751:Vindesine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects
D014747:Vinblastine; D002945:Cisplatin; D014751:Vindesine
Résultats d'une étude randomisée comparant l'association Navelbine-cisplatinum à l'association vindésine-cisplatinum et à la Navelbine seule chez 612 malades porteurs d'un carcinome bronchique non à petites cellules inopérable.