title: Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.
abstract: A prospective comparison was made of standard two-dimensional MRI sequences, at both high and midfield strength, with CT myelography in 23 patients with cervical spondylosis. MRI is adequate for assessment of cord compression, where high field strength is superior to midfield strength. MRI using 4-mm sections is inadequate for presurgical assessment of root compression. It remains to be proven whether thin-section white-CSF volume sequences or gadolinium-enhanced volume studies can replace CT myelography.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Royal Hull Hospitals, Hull, UK.
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Bartlett
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Hill
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Devlin
authors.forename: E D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Gardiner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009192:Myelography / Q000379:methods*; D009408:Nerve Compression Syndromes / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013117:Spinal Cord Compression / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery; D013126:Spinal Nerve Roots / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D013128:Spinal Osteophytosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*