title: The predictors of surgical procedure and the effects on functional recovery in elderly with subcapital fractures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  It has been demonstrated that the majority of hip fracture patients do not regain their prefracture level of functioning and usually decline in function following fracture. Little is known about the effectiveness of surgical procedure performed (hemiarthroplasty vs internal fixation) on functional recovery of subcapital fracture patients. This study examines the factors related to the type of the surgical procedure chosen and the effect of this selection on physical activities of daily living (PADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).
  
  
  METHODS
  The sample consists of 312 patients with subcapital fractures age 65 and older admitted from the community to one of seven Baltimore area hospitals between 1984 and 1986. Baseline information was obtained during hospitalization through structured interviews with both patients and their significant others (proxy). The follow-up interviews were administered to proxies at two months, six months, and one year after discharge from hospital. Information on disease diagnoses, fracture severity, and surgical procedures performed was obtained from medical charts.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients with a displaced fracture were seven times more likely to receive a hemiarthroplasty (OR = 7.0, 95% CI 3.7-13.1). During the short-term recovery (2 months after surgery), patients who received hemiarthroplasty were doing better in transferring, meal preparation, and shopping than those who received internal fixation. For the long-term functional recovery (one year), the overall PADL and IADL functions were not statistically significantly different between the two surgical procedures performed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The severity of fracture was found to be the most important determinant of surgical procedure. Patients with a subcapital fracture who received hemiarthroplasty tended to have a better functional recovery in the short term. Further study of other benefits of using as hemiarthroplasty is needed.
authors.affiliation: University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Young
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: German
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Brant
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kenzora
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Magaziner
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001178:Arthroplasty / Q000534:rehabilitation; D015142:Baltimore; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005544:Forecasting; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000534:rehabilitation; D006304:Health Status; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008603:Mental Health; D010351:Patient Discharge; D011331:Private Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012944:Social Support; D016896:Treatment Outcome