Long-term follow-up of heart transplant recipients requiring permanent pacemakers.
BACKGROUND
Permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation is contentious. Indications for these devices in this population are uncertain. The goals of this project were to (1) analyze the time course of donor sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular block after heart transplantation; (2) evaluate which selected parameters (donor age, ischemic time, heart rate before pacer insertion, and number of rejection episodes) might relate to persistent permanent pacing need, and (3) assess pacemaker complications during follow-up.


METHODS
A retrospective analysis of pacemaker implantations (22 cases) was performed in 286 consecutive heart transplantations performed between February 1984 and April 1994 at The Methodist Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.


RESULTS
Permanent pacemakers were inserted early after transplantation in 19 patients (mean 24 days); 14 pacemakers were for sinus node dysfunction (bradycardia in five, sinus arrest with junctional escape in eight, and optimization of hemodynamics in one). Symptomatic complete heart block prompted insertion late in two patients (3 and 47 months), and symptomatic sinus pause was the indication for late insertion in one. Recipient mean age was 52.4 years, with mean donor age 29.7 years in patients with pacemakers. By 3 months, 13 of 19 patients receiving pacemakers early (mean preinsertion heart rate 58.3 beats/min) became pacer independent with subsequent mean intrinsic heart rate of 97 beats/min. Recipient or donor age, ischemic time, and rejection episodes did not appear related to long-term pacing need early or late after transplantation.


CONCLUSIONS
Inferences from these observations include the fact that many patients with early sinus node dysfunction and bradycardia are not pacer dependent at 3 months. However, those with atrioventricular block early appear to require long-term pacing support. However, the possibility that more aggressive and long-term oral chronotropic medication use after transplantation would obviate early permanent pacemaker need is not addressed. Finally, prospective clinical trials are necessary to precisely characterize benefit of permanent pacemakers and define optimal pacing modes after heart transplantation.
Raghavan
C
C
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex, USA.
Maloney
J D
JD
Nitta
J
J
Lowry
R W
RW
Saliba
W I
WI
Cocanougher
B
B
Zhu
W X
WX
Young
J B
JB
D000328:Adult; D001283:Atrioventricular Node / Q000503:physiopathology; D001919:Bradycardia / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006084:Graft Rejection / Q000503:physiopathology; D016027:Heart Transplantation / Q000502:physiology*; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012849:Sinoatrial Node / Q000503:physiopathology; D016896:Treatment Outcome