title: How informed general practitioners manage mild hypertension: a survey of readers of drug bulletins in 7 countries. International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB).
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether general practitioners (GP) who are readers of independent drug bulletins can be used as an international epidemiological observatory of the criteria adopted by "well informed" doctors in various countries in the management of mild hypertension.
  
  
  METHODS
  Questionnaire study of GPs' diagnostic criteria for mild hypertension, routine investigation and management of patients with this diagnosis.
  
  
  METHODS
  206 GPs readers of independent drug bulletins in 7 countries, comprising 95 known systematic readers of a local bulletin and 111 randomly selected regular subscribers.
  
  
  METHODS
  Response rate to the questionnaire. Diagnostic criteria, routine investigations, and treatment used for patients with mild hypertension.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study required two months for planning and implementation. Four countries out of eleven had a response rate < or = 50% and were excluded; the frequency of responses from other countries was 69%. The average diastolic blood pressure (DBP) considered diagnostic of mild hypertension range from 94 mm Hg (lower threshold) to 106 (upper threshold). A minority (17%) of GPs routinely request the minimum recommended laboratory tests to assess patients. GPs routinely advise non-drug measures before starting a drug. Most would not start drug treatment in patients without other risk factors and a DBP below 100 mmHg. The top first choice drugs were diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor blockers. Half of the doctors were able to quote some published guide to the management of mild hypertension, and 18% cited a relevant trial. Attitudes in diagnosing and treating mild hypertension differed widely between GPs and countries.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  GP readers of drug bulletins can be used quickly and inexpensively to assess the extent to which recommended diagnostic and therapeutic practices are accepted by "well informed" doctors. The results suggest that attitudes in managing mild hypertension vary widely among GPs and countries and differ remarkably from the recommendations of published guidelines.
authors.affiliation: Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Avanzini
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Tognoni
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Alli
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Colombo
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Herxheimer
mesh_terms: D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology; D004032:Diet; D004232:Diuretics / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D007391:International Cooperation; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014944:World Health Organization
chemical_list: D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; D004232:Diuretics