The relation between discriminability and memory for vowels, consonants, and silent-center vowels.
People remember lists of vowel-contrasting syllables better than lists that vary only in stop consonant identity. Most views suggest that this difference is due to the structure of immediate memory and the greater discriminability of vowels compared with consonants. In all of these views, there is a presumed systematic relationship between discriminability and recall so that the more discriminable an item, the better that item should be recalled. The 11 experiments reported here measured the relative discriminability of and compared serial recall for (1) intact syllables that varied only in the medial vowel, (2) intact syllables that varied only in the initial consonant, and (3) syllables with the center vowel replaced by silence (so-called silent-center vowels). When item discriminability, as measured by identification, was equated for consonant-contrasting and silent-center lists, serial recall performance was also equal. However, even when the vowels were less discriminable than the consonants or silent-center vowels, serial recall performance for the vowels was still better. These results are problematic for theories based on acoustic discriminability but can be explained parsimoniously by Nairne's (1990) feature model.
Surprenant
A M
AM
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364, USA. aimee@psych.purdue.edu
Neath
I
I
D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D009622:Noise; D010700:Phonetics; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013063:Speech Discrimination Tests; D013067:Speech Perception