Multiple perceptions of discharge planning in one urban hospital.
Since the advent of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), advocacy groups have claimed that although hospital discharge planners perceive the discharge planning process as helpful, elderly patients and their families do not. This article explores how the discharge planning process was perceived by 40 discharge planners and 40 family caregivers. Planners greatly overrated caregiver influence and the amount adequacy of information shared about posthospital health care, choice of discharge to home or nursing home, and time to decide. Caregivers perceived that nursing homes were forced on patients by social workers and physicians. DRGs, physicians, and hospital administrators appeared to pressure social workers to coerce mentally competent patients into nursing homes. Excessive concern by hospital staff about patient safety after discharge may override patients' rights to autonomy and self-determination, violating the NASW Code of Ethics. Implications for practice, policy, and future research are discussed.
Clemens
E L
EL
Gerontology Institute, University of Massachusetts at Boston, 02125-3393, USA.
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001290:Attitude; D017028:Caregivers / Q000523:psychology*; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005260:Female; D006299:Health Services for the Aged; D006701:Home Nursing / Q000523:psychology; D006707:Homes for the Aged; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006786:Hospitals, Urban; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009735:Nursing Homes; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D010351:Patient Discharge; D012047:Rehabilitation Centers; D012308:Risk Management; D012947:Social Work