Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.
As an alternative to establishing awareness thresholds, stimulus contexts in which there were either greater conscious or greater unconscious influences were defined on the basis of performance on an exclusion task. Target words were presented for brief durations and each target word was followed immediately by its three-letter stem. Subjects were instructed to complete each stem with any word other than the target word. With this task, failures to exclude target words indicate greater unconscious influences, whereas successful exclusion indicates greater conscious influences. Conscious influences were dominant at long durations (e.g., 214 ms), but unconscious influences were dominant at short durations (e.g., 50 ms). Performance on the exclusion task successfully predicted both qualitative differences in Stroop priming and qualitative differences in recognition memory previously associated with the different effects of conscious and unconscious influences. Taken together, these results demonstrate that an exclusion task allows both unconscious and conscious influences to be defined in terms of significant deviations from baseline performance. As such, exclusion tasks provide a method for distinguishing conscious from unconscious influences that does not require establishing thresholds for null awareness.
Merikle
P M
PM
University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. pmerikle@watarts.uwaterloo.ca
Joordens
S
S
Stolz
J A
JA
D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D003243:Consciousness; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D011581:Psychological Tests; D012016:Reference Values; D012660:Semantics; D013997:Time Factors