The production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care.
Using Jordan's concept of authoritative knowledge, this article describes some of the ways that the prenatal care practices of a group of U.S. women help to consolidate biomedical hegemony. We analyze the considerations that the women took into account when deciding whether or not to accept specific prenatal care recommendations as authoritative, focusing on when and how they used their own "embodied" knowledge and experience as a standard against which to assess the validity of clinical recommendations. The data provide insight into medicalization processes and the role patients themselves play in furthering biomedical hegemony.
Browner
C H
CH
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Press
N
N
D000293:Adolescent; D001318:Authoritarianism; D002140:California; D005260:Female; D015438:Health Behavior; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007743:Labor, Obstetric / Q000523:psychology*; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011247:Pregnancy / Q000523:psychology*; D011295:Prenatal Care