Ambiguities and irresolvable tensions in the ADA: a reply to Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers.
This essay comments on the articles by Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers. It extends their analyses and concludes that consistency and the total absence of conflict may be unavailable when one interprets and applies the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Cutter
M A
MA
Center for the Arts and Humanities, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, USA.
D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000145:classification; D026686:Beneficence; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006262:Health; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D009922:Oregon; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010560:Personnel Selection / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011287:Prejudice; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012935:Social Justice; D012945:Social Values