title: Factoring handedness data: I. Item analysis.
abstract: Recently in this journal Peters and Murphy challenged the validity of factor analyses done on bimodal handedness data, suggesting instead that right- and left-handers be studied separately. But bimodality may be avoidable if attention is paid to Oldfield's questionnaire format and instructions for the subjects. Two characteristics appear crucial: a two-column LEFT-RIGHT format for the body of the instrument and what we call Oldfield's Admonition: not to indicate strong preference for handedness item, such as write, unless "... the preference is so strong that you would never try to use the other hand unless absolutely forced to...". Attaining unimodality of an item distribution would seem to overcome the objections of Peters and Murphy. In a 1984 survey in Boston we used Oldfield's ten-item questionnaire exactly as published. This produced unimodal item distributions. With reflection of the five-point item scale and a logarithmic transformation, we achieved a degree of normalization for the items. Two surveys elsewhere based on Oldfield's 20-item list but with changes in the questionnaire format and the instructions, yielded markedly different item distributions with peaks at each extreme and sometimes in the middle as well.
authors: New England Medical Computing, Winchester, MA 01890, USA.
authors: H B
authors: HB
authors: Messinger
authors: M I
authors: MI
authors: Messinger
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002140:California; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006261:Headache / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008404:Massachusetts; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires