A protocol to improve analgesia use in the accident and emergency department.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the use of analgesia in an accident and emergency (A&E) department and identify shortcomings.


METHODS
University teaching hospital.


METHODS
An audit of patients referred from the A&E department to orthopaedic fracture clinic (n = 100) or for orthopaedic admission (n = 100) was carried out to document analgesia use. An analgesia protocol was introduced and analgesia use was reassessed on the same numbers of patients.


RESULTS
Prescribing of analgesia was initially poor: 91% of fracture clinic referrals and 39% of admissions received no analgesia while in the A&E department; when given, it was often by inappropriate routes. Introduction of an analgesia protocol significantly improved analgesia use: fracture clinic referrals receiving unsatisfactory analgesia were reduced from 91% to 69% (P < 0.001). There was a marked increase in the use of intravenous analgesia, from 9% to 37% (P < 0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
Large numbers of patients still receive no analgesia while in the A&E department. This seems to be a common problem requiring intervention at a national level. The absence of a coordinated approach to improving analgesia provision for acute trauma in the United Kingdom should be addressed urgently.
Goodacre
S W
SW
Accident and Emergency Department, St Jame's University Hospital, Leeds.
Roden
R K
RK
D000698:Analgesia / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000628:therapy; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D009141:Musculoskeletal System / Q000293:injuries; D009985:Orthopedics / Q000592:standards; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D006113:United Kingdom