title: Ethical assumptions and ambiguities in the Americans With Disabilities Act.
abstract: The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) promotes social justice by protecting disabled persons from discrimination and prejudice. It seeks equality of opportunity for them and protects their well being by giving them fair access to goods, services and benefits. These rights are circumscribed in the ADA, however, by constraints of cost, efficiency, utility, and certain social mores. The ADA offers little direction about how to set priorities when these values come into conflict, or about whether equality or opportunity favors equivalent or preferential treatment for disadvantaged people. Until these ambiguities and potential value conflicts are resolved, a central moral and social problem remains unresolved: How can we demonstrate commitment to the rights and welfare of those with severe disabilities while placing fair limits upon their claims? Five special concerns are discussed: (1) eligibility and the allocation of health care; (2) the meaning of 'qualified but disabled' in employing people with mental disabilities; (3) equal opportunity and problems of envy and malingering; (4) ADA accommodation and public protection through testing and licensure; and (5) ADA protection and problems of backlash. Rather than simply wait to see what courts and administrative agencies decide, we should evaluate the moral conflicts, articulate criteria, and help make some difficult choices on morally defensible grounds.
authors: Department of Medical Humanities, East Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, N.C., USA.
authors: L M
authors: LM
authors: Kopelman
mesh_terms: D026686:Beneficence; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D035082:Federal Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D009922:Oregon; D010560:Personnel Selection / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011287:Prejudice; D040841:Resource Allocation; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012935:Social Justice; D012940:Social Problems / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012945:Social Values; D028761:Withholding Treatment