Surgical video systems.
Surgical video systems (SVSs), which typically consist of a video camera attached to an optical endoscope, a video processor, a light source, and a video monitor, are now being used to perform a significant number of minimally invasive surgical procedures. SVSs offer several advantages (e.g., multiple viewer visualization of the surgical site, increased clinician comfort) over nonvideo systems and have increased the practicality and convenience of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Currently, SVSs are used by hospitals in their general, obstetric/gynecologic, orthopedic, thoracic, and urologic procedures, as well as in other specialties for which MIS is feasible. In this study, we evaluated 19 SVSs from 10 manufacturers, focusing on their use in laparoscopic applications in general surgery. We based our ratings on the usefulness of each system's video performance and features in helping clinicians provide safe and efficacious laparoscopic surgery. We rated 18 of the systems Acceptable because of their overall good performance and features. We rated 1 system Conditionally Acceptable because, compared with the other evaluated systems, this SVS presents a greater risk of thermal injury resulting from excessive heating at the distal tip of the laparoscope. Readers should be aware that our test results, conclusions, and ratings apply only to the specific systems and components tested in this Evaluation. In addition, although our discussion focuses on the laparoscopic application of SVSs, much of the information in this study also applies to other MIS applications, and the evaluated devices can be used in a variety of surgical procedures. To help hospitals gain the perspectives necessary to assess the appropriateness of specific SVSs to ensure that the needs of their patients, as well as the expectations of their clinicians, will be satisfied, we have included a Selection and Purchasing Guide that can be used as a supplement to our Evaluation findings. We have also included a Glossary of relevant terminology and the supplementary article, "Fiberoptic Illumination Systems and the Risk of Burns or Fire during Endoscopic Procedures," which addresses a safety concern with the use of these devices. While we made every effort to present the most current information, readers should recognize that this is a rapidly evolving technology, and developments occurring after our study was complete may not be reflected in the text. For additional information on topics related to this study, refer to the following Health Devices articles: (1) our Guidance Article, "Surgical Video Systems Used in Laparoscopy," 24(1), January 1995, which serves as an introduction to SVS terminology and includes a discussion of the significance of many SVS specifications; (2) our Evaluation, "Video Colonoscope Systems," 23(5), May 1994, which includes a detailed overview of video endoscopic applications and technology; and (3) our Evaluations of laparoscopic insufflators (21[5], May 1992, and 24[7], July 1995), which address issues related to the creation of a viewing and working space inside the peritoneal cavity to facilitate visualization in laparoscopic procedures.
D003116:Color / Q000592:standards; D004867:Equipment Design; D004868:Equipment Failure; D004869:Equipment Safety / Q000592:standards; D006804:Ergonomics / Q000592:standards; D005336:Fiber Optic Technology / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000592:standards; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D007324:Institutional Management Teams; D020706:Laparoscopes; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation; D008029:Lighting / Q000592:standards; D008389:Marketing of Health Services / Q000592:standards; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D011682:Purchasing, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000379:methods; D014741:Video Recording / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards