title: 103Pd brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for clinically localized, high-risk prostatic carcinoma.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To summarize biochemical failure rates and morbidity of external beam irradiation (EBRT) combined with palladium (103Pd) boost for clinically localized high-risk prostate carcinoma.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-three consecutive patients with stage T2a-T3 prostatic carcinoma were treated from 1991 through 1994. Each patient had at least one of the following risk factors for extracapsular disease extension: Stage T2b or greater (71 patients), Gleason score 7-10 (40 patients), prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 15 (32 patients), or elevated prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) (17 patients). Patients received 41 Gy EBRT to a limited pelvic field, followed 4 weeks later by a 103Pd boost (prescription dose: 80 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/ml (normal < 4.0 ng/ml). Patients whose PSA was still decreasing at the last follow-up were censored at that time. Patients whose PSA plateaued at a value greater than 1.0 were scored as failures at the time the PSA first plateaued.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The overall, actuarial freedom from biochemical failure at 3 years after treatment was 79%. In Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of failure was elevated acid phosphatase (p = 0.04), followed by PSA (p = 0.17), Stage (p = 0.23), and Gleason score (p = 0.6). Treatment-related morbidity was usually limited to temporary, RTOG Grade 1-2 urinary symptoms. One patient, who had both a transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) and a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), developed low-volume urinary incontinence. The actuarial potency rate at 3 years after implantation was 77% for 46 patients who were sexually potent prior to implant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Biochemical freedom from failure rates following combined EBRT and 103Pd brachytherapy for clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer compare favorably with that reported after conventional dose EBRT alone. Morbidity has been acceptable.
authors: Department of Radiology, University Community Hospital, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Dattoli
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Wallner
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Sorace
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Koval
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Cash
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Acosta
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Brown
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Etheridge
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Binder
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Brunelle
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Kirwan
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Sanchez
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Stein
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Wasserman
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor / Q000097:blood; D001918:Brachytherapy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010165:Palladium / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D010410:Penile Erection / Q000528:radiation effects; D017430:Prostate-Specific Antigen / Q000097:blood; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000097:blood / Q000473:pathology / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011868:Radioisotopes / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor; D011868:Radioisotopes; D010165:Palladium; D017430:Prostate-Specific Antigen