title: Primary therapy for tubal disease: surgery versus IVF.
abstract: Infertility involves fallopian tube occlusion or other malfunction in over 25% of cases. Reconstructive surgery offers the possibility of natural conception, but the success rate overall is less than 30% and if the hydrosalpinx is severe or other factors are involved, much lower than that. IVF-ET currently offers a much higher success rate. Although the cost of IVF per cycle is over three-fourths the total cost of tubal surgery, the eventual success rate of IVF is so much better than that of surgery that the costs per baby delivered are some 10% lower. In addition, more infertile couples are rewarded in their quest to have a child.
authors: Philadelphia Fertility Institute, PA 19107, USA.
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Gocial
mesh_terms: D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005184:Fallopian Tube Diseases / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000191:economics; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D011247:Pregnancy