title: Cestode systematics: any progress?
abstract: In this short review, I summarize the recent advances, the present state and future for research in the field of cestode systematics. First, within an historical context, I briefly outline why our understanding of relationships within the Eucestoda has been problematic and contentious. On this foundation, I then summarize and discuss recent progress at various supraspecific levels, and at the specific level. Of particular interest in this respect is the discrepancy between the methods applied to understand the evolution of a few well-studied taxa, for instance the complex of Echinococcus species, contrasted with our relative ignorance about the systematic status of the vast majority of species. This leads to a review of the diversity of classical and new methodologies currently applied in the field of cestode systematics. Applications of morphoanatomical investigations as well as more recent molecular tools are examined, and some less common approaches are also reviewed. Finally, several practical and theoretical difficulties that are specific to the domain are discussed. These include problems in accessibility of material and adequate consideration of host-specificity. Our current state of knowledge represents an apparent paradox in that significant progress has indeed been achieved during the last 15 years, but appears limited to very specific cases, principally among medically important taxa. Conversely, more general works whose utility has been long recognized have not been addressed despite their conceptual simplicity. Consequently the development of new techniques, especially molecular ones, to allow access to new classes of characters is encouraged. However the need for continuous effort using more traditional approaches, including continued field collection, excellent and detailed descriptions and redescriptions, as well as critical revisions of classical monographs is also emphasized. A synergism linking morphological and molecular characters and phylogenetic approaches to analysis provides a firm foundation for rapid and seminal advances in the elucidation of relationships among the Eucestoda.
authors.affiliation: University of Neuchâtel, Department of Parasitology, Switzerland. mariaux@musinof.ville-ge.ch
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mariaux
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002589:Cestoda / Q000145:classification*; D006801:Humans