title: Physical restraint use in the hospital setting: unresolved issues and directions for research.
abstract: Although the use of physical restraint has declined in nursing homes, the practice remains widespread in hospitals. The use of physical restraint in hospitals was reviewed to identify the current clinical, legal, and ethical issues and the implications for policy and further research. Clinicians use physical restraints to prevent patient falls, to forestall disruption of therapy, or to control disruptive behavior, but they vary in how they determine to institute these restraints. The evidence to support the reasons for their determinations is not compelling. Fear of litigation remains a powerful motivator. The ethical dilemma of autonomy versus beneficence has not been resolved satisfactorily for patients in this setting. The lack of large-scale studies in any of these areas makes it difficult for policy makers to determine whether it is necessary to address hospital physical restraint practices through additional regulation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nursing Education and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.
authors.forename: L C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Mion
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Minnick
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Palmer
mesh_terms: D032763:Behavior Control; D026686:Beneficence; D035082:Federal Government; D033161:Government Regulation; D006302:Health Services Research; D015285:Hospital-Patient Relations; D006801:Humans; D007297:Inpatients / Q000145:classification; D016365:Liability, Legal; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009738:Nursing Service, Hospital / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D028701:Patient Rights; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012149:Restraint, Physical / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012308:Risk Management; D014481:United States; D014600:Utilization Review