title: A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.
abstract: Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic whose activity is selectively oriented against Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Clostridium difficile, Peptostreptococcus spp. and Corynebacterium jeikeium; such activity is affected by neither methicillin resistance nor beta-lactamase production. Teicoplanin is not significantly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract; consequently, it has to be administered intravenously (either by infusion or by rapid injection) or intramuscularly. Its long half-life allows regimens based upon once daily administration. The adverse effects most frequently associated with teicoplanin treatment are local and hypersensitivity reactions, such as itching and drug fever; anaphylactoid reactions (the 'red man syndrome') are seldom observed. Teicoplanin also has less potential than vancomycin to cause nephrotoxicity, especially when administered in combination with an aminoglycoside. Teicoplanin has been proven to be effective in the treatment of microbiologically documented Gram-positive infections, including 'difficult to treat infections' such as endocarditis and prosthetic infections. Furthermore, recent trials in patients with haematological malignancies or other cancers have clearly demonstrated that teicoplanin is at least as efficacious as vancomycin in the empirical initial antibiotic regimen for febrile neutropenic patients, and is associated with fewer adverse effects. Finally, owing to its good tolerability profile and the advantage of once daily administration by both intravenous and intramuscular routes, teicoplanin has proven to be very useful for the outpatient treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. In conclusion, teicoplanin is potentially an effective alternative to vancomycin both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, with the advantage over vancomycin of single daily dose administration and lower toxicity. Further comparative studies with vancomycin are, however, required to better define the therapeutic role of teicoplanin for particular infections (i.e. infective endocarditis).
authors.affiliation: Infectious Diseases Department, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: de Lalla
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Tramarin
mesh_terms: D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000188:drug therapy*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012307:Risk Factors; D017334:Teicoplanin / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014640:Vancomycin / Q000009:adverse effects
chemical_list: D017334:Teicoplanin; D014640:Vancomycin