title: Effects of local restriction of evaporation and moderate local ventilation on thermoregulatory responses in exercising humans.
abstract: Ten healthy young men participated in two series of three trials: series 1 (C1) with, or without, local restriction of evaporation (either on the trunk or on the legs) and series 2 (C2) with, or without, local moderate nitrogen ventilation (40 l.min-1) under an impermeable garment (trunk or leg ventilation). After 60-min rest in a thermoneutral environment, the subjects exercised in a warm environment [30 degrees C, 47% relative humidity (rh) during C1 and 29% rh during C2] on a cycle ergometer for 60 min at 70 W during C1 or at 60 W during C2. During C1, local covering with plastic foil did not increase internal temperature, but increased the mean skin temperature with a higher effect in the case of leg restriction. The trunk skin temperature was affected by the leg covering while the leg skin temperature was not changed by the trunk covering. Only the local sweat rate of the trunk was increased by the two restriction conditions. During C2, internal temperature was decreased by local ventilation while mean skin temperature was reduced only by trunk ventilation. The local ventilation affected only trunk skin temperature with a greater decrease during trunk ventilation. Trunk ventilation did not influence the skin temperature of the legs while ventilation of the legs decreased trunk skin temperature. In addition, leg ventilation decreased the sweat rate of the legs. The impermeable suit worn during C2 led to a greater physiological strain compared to the plastic film worn during C1 even with local ventilation under the impermeable garment. As expected, limiting sweat evaporation led to an increase in physiological strain. Microclimate ventilation at a rate of 40 l.min-1 was not sufficient to allow total heat dissipation but allowed 60-min exercise in a warm environment to be completed without excessive heat accumulation. It would appear that ventilation of the trunk locally was the best solution because of the smaller increase in skin temperature and higher sweating capacity of the trunk.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire de Physiologie et de Psychologie Environnementales, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
authors.forename: A V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Desruelle
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bothorel
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hoeft
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Candas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001642:Bicycling; D001833:Body Temperature Regulation / Q000502:physiology*; D015444:Exercise / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D006813:Humidity; D008297:Male; D012881:Skin Temperature; D013546:Sweating / Q000502:physiology*; D013696:Temperature