title: Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness.
abstract: In order to determine the maximum joint stiffness that could be produced by cocontraction of wrist flexor and extensor muscles, experiments were conducted in which healthy human subjects stabilized a wrist manipulandum that was made mechanically unstable by using positive position feedback to create a load with the characteristics of a negative spring. To determine a subject's limit of stability, the negative stiffness of the manipulandum was increased by increments until the subject could no longer reliably stabilize the manipulandum in a 1 degree target window. Static wrist stiffness was measured by applying a 3 degree rampand-hold displacement of the manipulandum, which stretched the wrist flexor muscles. As the load stiffness was made more and more negative, subjects responded by increasing the level of cocontraction of flexor and extensor muscles to increase the stiffness of the wrist. The stiffness measured at a subject's limit of stability was taken as the maximum stiffness that the subject could achieve by cocontraction of wrist flexor and extensor muscles. In almost all cases, this value was as large or larger than that measured when the subject was asked to cocontract maximally to stiffen the wrist in the absence of any load. Static wrist stiffness was also measured when subjects reciprocally activated flexor or extensor muscles to hold the manipulandum in the target window against a load generated by a stretched spring. We found a strong linear correlation between wrist stiffness and flexor torque over the range of torques used in this study (20-80% maximal voluntary contraction). The maximum stiffness achieved by cocontraction of wrist flexor and extensor muscles was less than 50% of the maximum value predicted from the joint stiffness measured during matched reciprocal activation of flexor and extensor muscles. EMG recorded from either wrist flexor or extensor muscles during maximal cocontraction confirmed that this reduced stiffness was due to lower levels of activation during cocontraction of flexor and extensor muscles than during reciprocal contraction.
authors.affiliation: Institut de réadaptation de Montréal, Canada.
authors.forename: T E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Milner
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cloutier
authors.forename: A B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Leger
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Franklin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004576:Electromyography; D005246:Feedback / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007537:Isometric Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D007596:Joints / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D012018:Reflex / Q000502:physiology