Report on the RCDS-CDHSRU workshop on developing clinical guidelines/standards of practice.
Investigators from the Community Dental Health Services Research Unit (CDHSRU) held a workshop to test a model for developing clinical guidelines/standards of practice, which are required under the Regulated Health Professions Legislation. Forty-two individuals from Ontario and Canada, including dentists, representatives of the public, and professionals, participated in the three-day workshop, held under the auspices of the quality assurance committee of the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario (RCDS). Through direct experience, workshop participants sought to learn each of the steps, as defined by the literature, involved in clinical guideline development. Ultimately, they hoped to recommend steps for RCDS to follow in developing standards of practice. To ensure that a realistic and valid model emerged from the workshop, a real topic, namely the management of smooth surface enamel lesions in permanent teeth, was used to develop and test clinical guidelines. Prior to the workshop, participants were sent literature on one of five aspects of the topic, as well as papers describing the methodology of critically appraising the literature, and partially-completed templates outlining the basic steps to be followed. During the first evening and first morning of the workshop, participants listened to presentations on the development of clinical guidelines, the prevalence of smooth surface lesions, the role of economics in guideline development, and the necessary considerations in writing clinical guidelines. Under the leadership of trained facilitators, they then worked in small groups to write evidence-based recommendations and report them to the other workshop participants for feedback. Using this feedback, they returned to their groups to revise their recommendations and work on the workshop's overall recommendations to the RCDS. The day concluded in the evening, when the workshop facilitators and coordinators met to edit the groups' recommendations into a consistent format for presentation to all participants. On the second morning, the participants attended a plenary session to review the evidence-based recommendations developed by the groups, as well as their overall recommendations on the steps to be followed by the RCDS. Ultimately, workshop participants partially completed the templates and developed preliminary evidence-based recommendations on the management of enamel smooth-surface caries. Based on their experiences, they recommended a seven-step process for the future development of clinical practice guidelines/standards of practice in Ontario. These steps are recommendations only, and are not RCDS policy.
Leake
J L
JL
Department of community dentistry, faculty of dentistry, University of Toronto.
Main
P A
PA
Woodward
G L
GL
D002170:Canada; D003149:Community Dentistry; D003226:Congresses as Topic; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000473:pathology; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000191:economics; D003813:Dentistry / Q000592:standards; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012953:Societies, Dental; D014089:Tooth Remineralization / Q000191:economics; D014956:Writing