title: [Alternatives and access routes in hysterectomies. Are randomizations dangerous?].
abstract: Hysterectomy is a common gynaecological operation in Europe. Although the advantages of new minimally invasive procedures seem obvious, prospective randomised trials are essential for proper appraisal. We reviewed all randomised studies about routes for hysterectomy and comparison of conservative or radical surgery. This study points out the many deficiencies of such studies. Referred conclusions are then open to criticism. We concluded that new prospective studies should be performed, adapted to social, cultural and economic conditions in Europe.
authors.affiliation: Clinique Universitaire de Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Pathologie de la Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier, Roubaix.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cosson
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Querleu
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Subtil
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Dubecq
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Crépin
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods*; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design
vernacular_title: Alternatives et voies d'abord des hystérectomies. Les randomisations dangereuses?