Body composition assessment in lean and normal-weight young women.
Using percentage body fat (BF%) from a three-compartment (3C) model (body density from underwater weighing (UWW) and bone-mineral mass from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a criterion, we studied the accuracy of UWW, DXA, two skinfold equations, and two bioimpedance (BIA) equations. Thirty-four women (aged 16-20 years) with BF% 13.5-31.1 volunteered. UWW underestimated BF% by -0.5 BF% (95% CI: -1.0; -0.02), whereas DXA overestimated it by 7.3 BF% (95% CI 5.8; 8.8). Skinfolds underestimated and BIA overpredicted BF%. The differences between 3C and UWW, skinfolds (Durnin & Womersley, 1974) and BIA (Deurenberg et al. 1990) were dependent (range of r values: -0.63 to -0.79; P < 0.0001) on BF%, causing an overestimation of lean subjects' (UWW, BIA) or an underestimation of normal-weight subjects' (UWW, skinfolds) BF%. The 3C model and UWW gave comparable body-composition results for healthy young women with BF% of approximately 20-25. Based on a significant mean difference from the 3C model, and a large standard error of the estimate, we do not regard DXA as superior to skinfolds or BIA to assess BF%.
Fogelholm
G M
GM
UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
Kukkonen-Harjula
T K
TK
Sievänen
H T
HT
Oja
P
P
Vuori
I M
IM
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon; D000273:Adipose Tissue; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001823:Body Composition / Q000502:physiology*; D001835:Body Weight; D015519:Bone Density; D017097:Electric Impedance; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012885:Skinfold Thickness