Monocular contribution to the peak time of the binocular pattern visual evoked potential.
The contribution of each monocular pathway to the timing of the binocular pattern visual evoked potential was assessed in situations where a significant interocular timing discrepancy was observed. Monocular and binocular pattern visual evoked potentials to 0.5 degree checks were recorded from normal subjects, normal subjects in whom one eye was blurred, patients with monocular amblyopia, and patients with resolved unilateral optic neuritis. Normal subjects showed facilitation, while suppression was evidenced in subjects with monocular blurring. In patients with amblyopia, the affected pathway had no effect on binocular pattern visual evoked potential latency, suggesting that the amblyopic eye was suppressed. In contrast, all patients with optic neuritis showed binocular averaging. Our results show that different forms of binocular interaction are evidenced in normal subjects, in amblyopia and in optic neuritis, and suggest that a comparative analysis of monocular and binocular pattern visual evoked potential peak times brings valuable information to the clinical evaluation that could be used to distinguish disease processes further.
McKerral
M
M
Department de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Lachapelle
P
P
Tremblay
F
F
Polomeno
R C
RC
Roy
M S
MS
Beneish
R
R
Leporé
F
F
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000550:Amblyopia / Q000503:physiopathology*; D002648:Child; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009902:Optic Neuritis / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology*; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014792:Visual Acuity