title: A comparison of the sensitivity of manometric rhinometry, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and nasal peak flow to detect the decongestant effect of xylometazoline.
abstract: A study has been undertaken to compare the sensitivity of manometric rhinometry, rhinomanometry, nasal peak flow and acoustic rhinometry to detect the decongestant effect of xylometazoline. Twenty healthy volunteers were investigated before and after decongestion. The sensitivity of all four methods varied from 80 to 95%. These differences were not significant. Manometric rhinometry, a new method of investigating nasal physiology, is as sensitive as more established methods.
authors.affiliation: ENT Department, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Porter
authors.forename: I G
authors.initials: IG
authors.lastname: Williamson
authors.forename: D H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Kerridge
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Maw
mesh_terms: D000316:Adrenergic alpha-Agonists / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007093:Imidazoles / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D010256:Paranasal Sinuses / Q000503:physiopathology; D012852:Sinusitis / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000503:physiopathology
chemical_list: D000316:Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; D007093:Imidazoles; C009695:xylometazoline