Involving clients in clinical audits of mental health services.
Involving clients in service audits is never straightforward. In developing a new audit system for use in mental health settings a review of the literature demonstrated that the concept of satisfaction, like quality, is problematic because it is multidimensional, it is affected by expectations, and may be defined differently by professionals and clients. Furthermore, it fails to address the notion of empowerment. However, the literature provided some clear methodological guidance about involving clients in clinical audit. Clients must be involved in defining audit topics, and the most appropriate techniques of data-collection are open-ended and qualitative. Clients can also be involved in the process of audit, particularly through conducting audits in collaboration with professionals. Evidence from the literature persuaded the authors to abandon the idea of developing an audit module on patient satisfaction, and instead to develop one with a clear focus on clients' perspectives, entitled "Clients' Appraisal of Care" as part of the Newcastle Audit System, with clients involved throughout.
Balogh
R
R
Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Simpson
A
A
Bond
S
S
D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000379:methods*; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000592:standards*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011209:Power, Psychological; D013222:State Medicine / Q000592:standards; D006113:United Kingdom