title: A comparison of electrophoretic resolution for snapshot and finish-line imaging.
abstract: Finish-line imaging, in which DNA or other macromolecules are detected after electrophoresis for a constant distance, usually improves resolution compared to snapshot imaging, in which molecules are electrophoresed for a constant time in an apparatus of comparable dimensions. Resolving power, which is an objective measure of the ability of different separatory methods to detect closely spaced molecular species, can be used to compare directly the performance of systems employing both snapshot and finish-line imaging [E. A. Ribeiro and J. C. Sutherland, Anal. Biochem. 210, 378-388 (1993)]. Experimentally determined values of resolving power are influenced both by the method of imaging (snapshot vs finish-line) and by instrument-specific factors that affect resolution. Previous comparisons of the resolving power obtained with finish-line and snapshot imaging involved data sets acquired by different instruments with different instrumental resolutions. To reduce the influence of instrumental effects, we constructed a scanning laser fluorometer that can measure both snapshot and finish-line images of fluorochrome-labeled DNA. Snapshot and finish-line images of a DNA sample containing HaeII restriction fragments of the DNA from bacteriophage T7, which range in length from 474 to 6514 base pairs, were obtained under otherwise identical electrophoretic conditions. Snapshot and finish-line imaging give similar resolving powers for DNA molecules up to about 1.5 kbp long. For both imaging modes, maximum resolving power was achieved for DNA molecules between 2 and 3 kbp in length. For larger DNA molecules, finish-line imaging provided higher resolving power. The ratio of the resolving power of finish-line images to that of snapshot images increased monotonically as a function of DNA length. For the longest restriction fragments studied (6514 bp), the resolving power for finish-line images exceeded that of snapshot images by about 50%.
authors.affiliation: Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 11973, USA.
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Sutherland
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Fisk
authors.forename: D C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Monteleone
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Trunk
mesh_terms: D017123:Bacteriophage T7 / Q000235:genetics; D004279:DNA, Viral / Q000737:chemistry*; D015252:Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific / Q000378:metabolism; D004587:Electrophoresis, Agar Gel / Q000379:methods*; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D007834:Lasers
chemical_list: D004279:DNA, Viral; C031851:endodeoxyribonuclease HaeII; D015252:Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific