Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated adults.
This study analyzed the relationship in orthodontically treated adults between upper central incisor displacement measured on lateral cephalograms and apical root resorption measured on anterior periapical x-ray films. A multiple linear regression examined incisor displacements in four directions (retraction, advancement, intrusion, and extrusion) as independent variables, attempting to account for observed differences in the dependent variable, resorption. Mean apical resorption was 1.36 mm (sd +/- 1.46, n = 73). Mean horizontal displacement of the apex was -0.83 mm (sd +/- 1.74, n = 67); mean vertical displacement was 0.19 mm (sd +/- 1.48, n = 67). The regression coefficients for the intercept and for retraction were highly significant; those for extrusion, intrusion, and advancement were not. At the 95% confidence level, an average of 0.99 mm (se = +/- 0.34) of resorption was implied in the absence of root displacement and an average of 0.49 mm (se = +/- 0.14) of resorption was implied per millimeter of retraction. R2 for all four directional displacement variables (DDVs) taken together was only 0.20, which implied that only a relatively small portion of the observed apical resorption could be accounted for by tooth displacement alone. In a secondary set of univariate analyses, the associations between apical resorption and each of 14 additional treatment-related variables were examined. Only Gender, Elapsed Time, and Total Apical Displacement displayed statistically significant associations with apical resorption. Additional multiple regressions were then performed in which the data for each of these three statistically significant variables were considered separately, with the data for the four directional displacement variables. The addition of information on Elapsed Time or Total Apical Displacement did not explain a significant additional portion of the variability in apical resorption. On the other hand, the addition of information on Gender to the information on the four directional displacement variables yielded an R2 value of 0.35, which indicated that these variables taken together could account for approximately a third of the observed variability in apical resorption in this sample.
Baumrind
S
S
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersery, Newark, USA.
Korn
E L
EL
Boyd
R L
RL
D000328:Adult; D002508:Cephalometry / Q000379:methods; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000628:therapy; D008437:Maxilla; D009971:Orthodontics, Corrective / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D011861:Radiography, Dental / Q000379:methods; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012391:Root Resorption / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D012737:Sex Factors; D013997:Time Factors; D014087:Tooth Movement Techniques / Q000009:adverse effects*; D014092:Tooth Root / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology