title: Visual object recognition.
abstract: Visual object recognition is of fundamental importance to most animals. The diversity of tasks that any biological recognition system must solve suggests that object recognition is not a single, general purpose process. In this review, we consider evidence from the fields of psychology, neuropsychology, and neurophysiology, all of which supports the idea that there are multiple systems for recognition. Data from normal adults, infants, animals, and brain damaged patients reveal a major distinction between the classification of objects at a basic category level and the identification of individual objects from a homogeneous object class. An additional distinction between object representations used for visual perception and those used for visually guided movements provides further support for a multiplicity of visual recognition systems. Recent evidence from psychophysical and neurophysiological studies indicates that one system may represent objects by combinations of multiple views, or aspects, and another may represent objects by structural primitives and their spatial interrelationships.
authors.affiliation: Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
authors.forename: N K
authors.initials: NK
authors.lastname: Logothetis
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Sheinberg
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology; D001931:Brain Mapping; D003867:Depth Perception; D005149:Facial Expression; D005556:Form Perception; D000882:Haplorhini; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007858:Learning; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology; D012399:Rotation; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000502:physiology; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception