title: Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) motor score.
abstract: METHODS
  In this study the motor scores of 62 consecutive acute spinal cord-injured patients were retrospectively reviewed.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores, compared with the conventional motor scores, was retrospectively assessed.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study scores has not as yet been confirmed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty-two consecutive adult patients admitted within 7 days of acute spinal cord injury between April, 1983, and September, 1992, were evaluated. The motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage of each of the American Spinal Injury Association and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores were compared with those of the conventional motor score. From the initial and final motor score, the motor deficit percentage and motor recovery percentage were calculated. There were 38 patients with cervical and thoracic lesions, 12 patients with dorso-lumbar lesions, and 12 patients with lower lumbar lesions. The average follow-up period was 41 months.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were representative of the conventional motor score for the evaluation of the motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage in all levels (P < 0.0001). The differences in all correlation coefficients between the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were not statistically significant in all levels and in every group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores can both be used for the neurological quantification of motor deficit and motor recovery.
authors.affiliation: Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries, Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital.
authors.forename: W S
authors.initials: WS
authors.lastname: El Masry
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tsubo
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Katoh
authors.forename: Y H
authors.initials: YH
authors.lastname: El Miligui
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Khan
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000503:physiopathology; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012955:Societies, Medical; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015599:Trauma Severity Indices