title: Comparison of bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude in sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter.
abstract: Automatic mode switching pacemakers revert to non-atrial tracking modes in response to sensed atrial tachyarrhythmias. It is unclear how atrial electrogram amplitudes in sinus rhythm compare to those during atrial tachyarrhythmias. In this study, peak-to-peak bipolar atrial electrogram amplitudes were measured during sinus rhythm and either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in 69 patients. The mean atrial electrogram amplitudes were 1.59 +/- 1.36 mV during sinus rhythm and 0.77 +/- 0.58 mV during atrial fibrillation (P < 0.0001) for 25 patients with atrial fibrillation and 1.81 +/- 2.07 mV during sinus and 1.5 +/- 1.81 mV (P < 0.0001) for 44 patients with atrial flutter. The mean electrogram amplitudes during both atrial fibrillation and flutter correlated significantly with amplitudes during sinus rhythm (R = 0.79, R = 0.94, respectively, both P < 0.0001). The coefficient of variance of individual electrogram amplitudes was greater in atrial fibrillation than sinus (P < 0.0001). By comparing 20th percentile electrogram amplitudes in atrial fibrillation and flutter to mean sinus amplitudes, intermittent very low electrogram amplitudes (< 0.3 mV) were more likely during atrial fibrillation and flutter if the mean sinus electrogram amplitudes were < 1.5 mV and < 0.5 mV, respectively (P < 0.01). Eightieth percentile electrogram amplitude values in atrial fibrillation and flutter were equally likely to exceed mean sinus amplitude values in respective patients. In conclusion, mean atrial electrogram amplitudes during atrial fibrillation and flutter are less than but correlated to sinus rhythm electrogram amplitudes. Very low amplitude individual electrograms during these atrial arrhythmias are associated with low mean sinus rhythm electrogram amplitudes. These findings may have implications for the programming of permanent dual chamber pacemakers in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, USA.
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Wood
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Moskovljevic
authors.forename: B S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Stambler
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Ellenbogen
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy; D001282:Atrial Flutter / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D005583:Fourier Analysis; D006325:Heart Atria / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000502:physiology*; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial; D012016:Reference Values; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation*; D012984:Software; D016896:Treatment Outcome