title: A comparison of endoscopic and capsule small intestinal biopsy techniques in children with upper gastrointestinal disorders.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the adequacy for histological diagnosis and morphometric analysis of small intestinal biopsies obtained by either endoscopic forceps or a capsule technique.
  
  
  METHODS
  Small intestinal biopsies from 176 children were reviewed, 92 obtained by endoscopy and 84 by capsule.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The adequacy for making a histological diagnosis was 96 and 81% for endoscopic and capsule biopsies, respectively, and for morphometric analysis it was 86 and 71%. There were more tissue specimens from children who had endoscopic compared with capsule biopsies (2.3 vs 1.8 specimens per patient).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Endoscopic biopsies provide better specimens for histological diagnosis and endoscopy has the advantage of allowing macroscopic assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract which can be of value in recognizing unexpected pathology and in identifying patchy mucosal changes.
authors.affiliation: Academic Department of Child Health, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London, UK.
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Eltumi
authors.forename: P S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Ong
authors.forename: N D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Francis
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Brueton
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001706:Biopsy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D020776:Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / Q000379:methods; D005767:Gastrointestinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007413:Intestinal Mucosa / Q000473:pathology*; D007421:Intestine, Small / Q000473:pathology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity