Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: past, present, and future.
Experience, based on anthropometric examination of over 1000 children with facial syndromes and more than 2400 healthy subjects of both sexes and various ages, has led me to diverge in some points from the more usual views found in the physical anthropologic literature. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the major controversial topics associated with anthropometric measurement. These include the problems associated with formation of a representative population sample, the relative validity of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, the interpretation of intraobserver and interobserver testings, and the questionable judgments of mensurative skill in clinical practice. The factors influencing the accuracy of anthropometric measurements, definitions of both the consistent and less reliable measurements, and the duration of validity of anthropometric normative data are also discussed.
Farkas
L G
LG
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
D000886:Anthropometry; D002508:Cephalometry; D002648:Child; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004777:Environment; D005006:Ethnicity; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D015588:Observer Variation; D011153:Population; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D044465:White People