title: Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: is it useful or necessary?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  A retrospective study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study population consisted of 68 patients with a histologically proven cartilaginous tumor.
  
  
  METHODS
  For each lesion, a comparative analysis of "plain radiography" versus "plain radiography together with MR study" was performed by two radiologists together. Recently reported literature data were used as criteria by which to define accuracy rating.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  MR imaging improves accuracy in diagnosing low-grade chondrosarcomas. Since osteochondromas have a characteristic appearance on plain films, MR imaging contributes only in the diagnostic workup of cases in which malignant transformation is suspected.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis, Antwerpen, Belgium.
authors.forename: L H
authors.initials: LH
authors.lastname: De Beuckeleer
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: De Schepper
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Ramon
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001859:Bone Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D002812:Chondroma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D002813:Chondrosarcoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D015831:Osteochondroma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies