From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.
Consistent preferences for particular types of movement suggest criteria for movement selection. These can be important when, as is usually the case, infinitely many movements allow a task to be achieved. The experiments reported here were designed to identify the source of a strong preference observed in earlier object-manipulation studies. In those earlier studies, subjects usually grabbed objects to be moved from one location to another in a way that afforded a comfortable final posture rather than a comfortable initial posture (the end-state comfort effect). The comfortable final state usually allowed the forearm to be at or near the middle of its range of motion on the pronation-supination dimension. The hypothesis tested here was that the end-state comfort effect stemmed from an expectation that movements can be made more quickly in the middle of the pronation-supination range than at either extreme. To test this hypothesis, we asked subjects, in the first experiment, to perform a handle rotation task that demanded little or no precision and so no need to make rapid to-and-fro homing-in movements near the end of the rotation. Half the subjects did not show the end-state comfort effect, in contrast to all previous studies, where all subjects showed the effect. An incidental finding of the first experiment was that handle rotations that ended at or near the end of the range of motion took longer than handle rotations that ended at or near the middle of the range of motion. To test the latter result more carefully, we asked subjects, in Experiments 2 and 3, to oscillate the forearm as quickly as possible, either in the supination part of the forearm rotation range, in the middle part of the range, or in the pronation part of the range. As predicted, oscillation frequencies were highest in midrange, and this was true for both hands. The results as a whole have implications for the relation between cognitive psychology and biomechanics, and for human factors.
Rosenbaum
D A
DA
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA. dar12@cac.psu.edu
van Heugten
C M
CM
Caldwell
G E
GE
D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D009949:Orientation; D011434:Proprioception; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time