Clinical extracts of biomedical literature for patient-centered problem solving.
This paper reports on a four-part qualitative research project aimed at designing an online document surrogate tailored to the needs of physicians seeking biomedical literature for use in clinical problem solving. The clinical extract, designed in collaboration with three practicing physicians, combines traditional elements of the MEDLINE record (e.g., title, author, source, abstract) with new elements (e.g., table captions, text headings, case profiles) suggested by the physicians. Specifications for the prototype clinical extract were developed through a series of relevance-scoring exercises and semi-structured interviews. For six clinical questions, three physicians assessed the applicability of selected articles and their document surrogates, articulating relevance criteria and reasons for their judgments. A prototype clinical extract based on their suggestions was developed, tested, evaluated, and revised. The final version includes content and format aids to make the extract easy to use. The goals, methods, and outcomes of the research study are summarized, and a template of the final design is provided.
Florance
V
V
University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642, USA.
D000043:Abstracting and Indexing; D002817:Chordoma / Q000532:radiotherapy / Q000601:surgery; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval; D016239:MEDLINE; D009862:Online Systems; D018802:Patient-Centered Care; D010819:Physician's Role; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011643:Publishing; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic