title: Assessing coronary stenosis. Quantitative coronary angiography versus visual estimation from cine-film or pharmacological stress perfusion images.
abstract: Visual judgment of stenosis severity from cine-film or single-photon emission computed tomographic dipyridamole perfusion images was compared to assessment of stenosis severity as measured with digital quantitative coronary angiography. Thirty patients with angiographically verified single-vessel disease underwent dipyridamole thallium stress testing within 90 days of angiography.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A percent diameter stenosis of > or = 50%, a percent area stenosis of > or = 75%, and a stenotic flow reserve of < 3.75 measured by quantitative coronary angiography (CMS, version 1.1, Medis Inc.) corresponded to haemodynamically significant stenosis as evaluated by visual estimates from cine-film or perfusion images. Quantitative coronary angiography percent diameter stenosis (51.2% +/- 12.6%) correlated closely (r = 0.74) but underestimated significantly visual assessment of stenosis severity from cine-film (69.3% +/- 21.2%; P = 0.0001). However, quantitative coronary angiography percent area stenosis (74.7% +/- 11.7%) more closely reflected visual estimates from cine-film (P = 0.19). Quantitative coronary angiography stenotic flow reserve showed the highest positive and negative predictive value regarding visual estimates from cine-film (88%, 86%) or perfusion images (88%, 64%) followed by percent diameter stenosis (86%, 75% 86%, 56%) and percent area stenosis (87%, 80%, 87%, 60%), respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Evaluation of coronary lesions by quantitative coronary angiography corresponds closely with visual estimates from cine-film and haemodynamic significance as evaluated by dipyridamole perfusion images.
authors.affiliation: University of Vienna, Department of Cardiology, Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gottsauner-Wolf
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Sochor
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Moertl
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gwechenberger
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Stockenhuber
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Probst
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D003331:Coronary Vessels / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D004176:Dipyridamole; D018450:Disease Progression; D005080:Exercise Test / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013794:Thallium Radioisotopes; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000379:methods*; D014664:Vasodilation; D014665:Vasodilator Agents
chemical_list: D013794:Thallium Radioisotopes; D014665:Vasodilator Agents; D004176:Dipyridamole