title: Esophageal replacement using the colon: is it a good choice?
abstract: Thirty-eight children (2 months to 26 years of age) underwent esophageal replacement at our institution between 1962 and 1993. Twenty-four patients had esophageal atresia, with the replacement performed at a mean age of 17 months. The remaining patients (37%) had strictures and were older (mean, 7.4 years). Replacement procedures involved the right colon in 61% of cases and the transverse left colon in the others (39%). Sixty-three percent were placed substernally and 37% were done in transthoracic fashion. The average length of stay in the hospital was 34 days (range, 11 to 256 days.) Early complications (within 30 days) included cervical anastomotic leaks (11 patients; 29%) pneumonia (4), would infection (2), pneumothorax/hemothorax (3), wound dehiscence (1), prolonged ventilation (2), vocal cord paralysis (1), Horner's syndrome (1), pancreatitis (1), and perforated graft (1). Despite the incidence of early leaks, only two persisted long-term (more than 3 months). Other late complications included significant proximal strictures (5), and cologastric strictures developed in five patients. Seven cases were considered graft failures (18%), and all of these eventually require graft replacement. Additional problems included redundant graft requiring revision (4) and dumping syndrome (2). There were six cases of intestinal obstruction caused by adhesions. Four of these involved intrathoracic obstruction of the graft and two involved small bowel obstruction. There was only one death, which occurred late and was not related to the primary disease or procedure. Long-term follow-up data were available for 20 patients (53%). The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 33 years (mean, 12 years). Fourteen had excellent results after the initial interposition, being able to eat and function well without any further intervention. Seven patients (18%) have had poor results and 17 (45%) required additional procedures to obtain good functional results. In our experience, the colon continues to be a good option for esophageal replacement, but additional procedures frequently are necessary to optimize the functional outcome. Good results can be expected in the majority of cases, but late problems (ie, redundant colon and poor emptying) are not unusual, and careful follow-up is essential in the management of such patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Ahmad
authors.forename: K G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Sylvester
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hebra
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Davidoff
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McClane
authors.forename: P W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Stafford
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Schnaufer
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: O'Neill
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003106:Colon / Q000637:transplantation*; D004933:Esophageal Atresia / Q000601:surgery*; D004940:Esophageal Stenosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006084:Graft Rejection / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D007223:Infant; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D012086:Reoperation; D016896:Treatment Outcome