title: How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.
abstract: Three experiments were performed to test Smith, Ward, and Schumacher's (1993) conformity hypothesis-that people's ideas will conform to examples they are shown in a creative generation task. Conformity was observed in all three experiments; participants tended to incorporate critical features of experimenter-provided examples. However, examination of total output, elaborateness of design, and the noncritical features did not confirm that the conformity effect constrained creative output in any of the three experiments. Increasing the number of examples increased the conformity effect (Experiment 1). Examples that covaried features that are naturally uncorrelated in the real world led to a greater subjective rating of creativity (Experiment 2). A delay between presentation and test increased conformity (Experiment 3), just as models of inadvertent plagiarism would predict. The explanatory power of theoretical accounts such as activation, retrieval blocking, structured imagination, and category abstraction are evaluated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-3013, USA. marsh@meme.psy.uga.edu
authors.forename: R L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Marsh
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Landau
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Hicks
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003405:Creativity; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D008297:Male; D011340:Problem Solving; D012925:Social Conformity; D013850:Thinking