Neural connectivity only accounts for a small part of neural correlation in auditory cortex.
In order to allow the relation of functional connectivity patterns (inferred from cross-correlograms) to structural connectivity (the anatomical substrate), we analyzed cross-correlogram peaks for spontaneous and stimulated activity in the auditory cortex. It was assumed that the broad correlograms, usually encountered, represent neural connectivity as well as secondary effects such as intrinsic firing patterns, global synchrony related to the ongoing electroencephalographic activity, and stimulus-related effects. Data were collected from 604 neuron pairs recorded under spontaneous conditions in primary auditory cortex of seven juvenile (30-70 days) and nine adult cats. Three hundred and six pairs (51%) had a peak cross-correlation coefficient significantly different from zero. For 113 neuron pairs out of this subgroup, correlations were calculated also for spike trains recorded during click stimulation. After a combined burst-correction and deconvolution procedure was carried out, the correlation peak strengths were not significantly changed for spontaneous activity, but peak width was narrower for single-electrode pairs than for dual-electrode pairs, suggesting a better synchronization for neighboring neurons. Under click stimulation conditions, overall peak synchronization strength was independent of interelectrode distance, whereas, after correction for secondary and stimulus effects, peak synchronization was significantly lower for dual-electrode pairs. However, the primary peak width for single-electrode pairs under stimulus conditions was no longer different from that of dual-electrode pairs. This implies that both under spontaneous and stimulus conditions secondary effects largely obscure any underlying correlation produced by anatomical connectivity. The secondary effects may be the result of intrinsic as well as network properties in auditory cortex and may functionally be more important than the weak primary effects resulting from anatomical connections. Cross-interval analysis suggests that the correlations in auditory cortex are dynamic and may show random switching between states of stronger and weaker synchronization.
Eggermont
J J
JJ
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. eggermon@acs.ucalgary.ca
Smith
G M
GM
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D002415:Cats; D003344:Cortical Synchronization; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology