[Quality control after pelvic injuries with a scoring system].
Quality control after treatment of pelvic injuries is often poor because many criteria of assessment lack objectivity. In order to attain improved comparability of results, we present a scoring system including subjective as well as functional and radiological criteria. The assessment is based on a calculation according to the importance of the criteria. The total score supplies the final result with a breakdown into excellent, good, fair and poor. 33 patients with type B and C injuries (Tile) underwent evaluation with this scoring system. We found 15 excellent, 10 good, 2 fair and 6 poor results. The score showed that patients' most frequent handicap was pain (median 60% of maximum score). Hip mobility was hardly affected, and from the radiological point of view it appeared that alterations of pelvic symmetry and symphysis were most common. Our proposal is to apply this scoring system on a wide basis, because only with a great number of patients can the effectiveness of the score be tested and different ways of treatment assessed with regard to early and late results. Our system could be a useful contribution to sufficient quality control, particularly after such complex and severe injuries.
Bürk
W
W
Abteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungs-chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Ulm.
Bauer
G
G
Krauss
J
J
Esch
P M
PM
Vogel
J
J
Kinzl
L
L
D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000145:classification*; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D017102:Fracture Healing / Q000502:physiology; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D010384:Pelvic Bones / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011786:Quality Control; D011788:Quality of Life; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D015599:Trauma Severity Indices; D016896:Treatment Outcome