Bone densitometry: comparison of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to radiographic absorptiometry.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the reliability and validity of radiographic absorptiometry of middle phalanges when compared to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the spine and hip as an indicator of osteoporosis.


METHODS
DEXA readings from the spine and femur were compared with radiographic absorptiometry measurements obtained the same day in a sample of 50 women (average age 63 yrs; range 23-86).


RESULTS
Both spine and femur DEXA scores were significantly correlated with radiographic absorptiometry scores (R = 0.70 and 0.68, respectively; approximate standard errors 0.08). DEXA scores were used as the standard, defining moderate fracture risk by a standardized t score < -2 and marked risk by t < -3. Using cutpoints of t < -2 for DEXA and t < -3 for standardized radiographic absorptiometry values, the sensitivity to osteopenia was 0.62 for DEXA of the spine and 0.63 for DEXA of the femur, with specificities of 0.90 and 0.96, respectively, at these cutpoints; the corresponding false positive and false negative rates for our cohort of women were 0.19 and 0.24 (spine) and 0.07 and 0.24 (femur). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, varying DEXA measurement site from spine to femur and standardized cutoff from -2 to -3; the areas under the resulting ROC curves ranged from 0.82 to 0.91.


CONCLUSIONS
Radiographic absorptiometry holds promise as a practical method for screening for osteoporosis.
Arthritis and Back Pain Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
R L
RL
Swezey
D
D
Draper
A M
AM
Swezey
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000379:methods*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015519:Bone Density; D001851:Bone Diseases, Metabolic / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged