Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures.
The literature on neonatal hearing screening by means of oto-acoustic emissions (OAE's) presents various prevalence figures, and gives little quantitative information on the procedure used to score the recordings. If the OAE test is to be interpreted by users who do not have the opportunity to develop intuitive interpretation skills through extensive training, a clear numerical decision criterion is needed. The present paper discusses the scoring procedure used by 25 teams, which together screen 22,356 neonates annually. More than 60% of the groups involved in this study use visual interpretation of the recorded OAE response, together with numerical criteria. Amongst the teams, 21 different ways of numerical scoring are used. It is shown that for a given set of OAE recordings, prevalence varies from 61% to 90%, depending on the numerical decision criterion being applied. We conclude that at this moment no consensus exists regarding the numerical criterion to be used when assessing OAE screening results. In view of the strong effect of criteria on the outcome of OAE screening, such consensus is urgently needed, but should be based on sensitivity and specificity figures for each scoring technique.
Dirckx
J J
JJ
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, St. Augustinus Hospital, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Daemers
K
K
Somers
T
T
Offeciers
F E
FE
Govaerts
P J
PJ
D000328:Adult; D006311:Hearing Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015997:Neonatal Screening / Q000379:methods; D017084:Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous; D015995:Prevalence; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity