The aftereffect to relative motion does not show interocular transfer.
The motion aftereffect is strongest after viewing a moving field embedded in a patterned stationary surround, which suggests that relative motion is an important signal for its generation. The contribution of relative motion to binocular aspects of the motion aftereffect was assessed. Subjects viewed uniformly moving random dots surrounded by a stationary random-dot annulus. These displays could be presented in a variety of combinations to each eye separately or to both eyes, during adaptation and test. It was found that, although the presence of relative motion during adaptation significantly extended the duration of the monocular motion aftereffect, it did not augment interocular transfer. The presence of stationary surround contours in the nonadapting eye did not influence the aftereffect in the adapting eye. The enhancement provided by stationary surround contours is largely dependent on their presence during adaptation. The presence or absence of surround contours during the test phase did not influence the duration of the aftereffect. These findings are consistent with previous suggestions that the motion aftereffect is, in part, the result of adaptation to relative motion that occurs relatively early in the visual pathway-before binocular integration.
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
L A
LA
Symons
P M
PM
Pearson
B
B
Timney
D000221:Adaptation, Ocular; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005133:Eye Movements; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D005366:Figural Aftereffect / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D015348:Vision, Binocular; D014795:Visual Pathways