Comparing and using assessments of the value of information to clinical decision-making.
This paper discusses the Value project, which assessed the value to clinical decision-making of information supplied by National Health Service (NHS) library and information services. The project not only showed how health libraries in the United Kingdom help clinicians in decision-making but also provided quality assurance guidelines for these libraries to help make their information services more effective. The paper reviews methods and results used in previous studies of the value of health libraries, noting that methodological differences appear to affect the results. The paper also discusses aspects of user involvement, categories of clinical decision-making, the value of information to present and future clinical decisions, and the combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments of value, as applied to the Value project and the studies reviewed. The Value project also demonstrated that the value placed on information depends in part on the career stage of the physician. The paper outlines the structure of the quality assurance tool kit, which is based on the findings and methods used in the Value project.
Department of Information and Library Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Dyfed, United Kingdom.
C J
CJ
Urquhart
J B
JB
Hepworth
D017046:Cost Savings; D003658:Decision Making, Computer-Assisted; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics; D005544:Forecasting; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000145:classification*; D007999:Library Services / Q000639:trends*; D016239:MEDLINE; D009317:National Library of Medicine (U.S.); D009862:Online Systems; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D011159:Population Surveillance; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012945:Social Values; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States