Rethinking the western construction of the welfare state.
This article employs case studies of China and Hong Kong to question the western ethnocentric construction of the welfare state that predominates in comparative social policy research. The authors argue that welfare regimes, and particularly the "welfare state," have been constructed as capitalist-democratic projects and that this has the damaging effect of excluding from analyses not only several advanced capitalist societies in the Asian-Pacific area but also the world's most populous country. If welfare state regimes can only coexist with western political democracies, then China and Hong Kong are excluded automatically. A similar result occurs if the traditional social administration approach is adopted whereby a "welfare state" is defined in terms only of direct state provision. The authors argue that such assumptions are untenable if state welfare is to be analyzed as a universal phenomenon. Instead of being trapped within an ethnocentric welfare statism, what social policy requires is a global political economy perspective that facilitates comparisons of the meaning of welfare and the state's role in producing it north, south, east and west.
Walker
A
A
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, England.
Wong
C K
CK
D002681:China; D003709:Democracy; D019049:Developed Countries; D006291:Health Policy; D006302:Health Services Research; D006723:Hong Kong; D006801:Humans; D007449:Investments; D015588:Observer Variation; D011056:Political Systems; D012946:Social Welfare; D012950:Socialism; D013222:State Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration*