title: Rectal mucosal electrosensitivity - what is being tested?
abstract: The results of rectal mucosal electrosensitivity (RME) testing have been used to support theories regarding the aetiology of both idiopathic constipation and bowel dysfunction following rectopexy. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of tests of RME. Sixty-eight patients, comprising three groups (group 1: 50 patients undergoing assessment in the Anorectal Physiology Unit, group 2: 10 patients with coloanal or ileoanal anastomosis, group 3: 8 patients with a stoma) underwent mucosal electrosensitivity testing, with the threshold stimulus required to elicit sensation being recorded. In addition the RME was measured in groups 1 and 2 when placing the electrode, mounted on a catheter with a central wire, against the anterior, posterior, right and left rectal or neorectal walls. To asses the influence on this test of loss of mucosal contact due to faeces, a further 8 cases with a normal rectum had RME performed with and without a layer of water soaked gauze around the electrode to stimulate faeces and prevent the electrode from making contact with the rectal mucosa. There was marked variance in the sensitivity of the different regions of rectal wall tested (P < 0.001). In group 1 patients the mean sensitivities were: central 36.6 mA, anterior 27.4 mA, posterior 37.9 mA, right 22.3 mA and left 25.6 mA. This circumferential variation suggests that the pelvic floor rather than rectal mucosa was being stimulated. All patients in group 2 had recordable sensitivities, and the mean sensitivity threshold was significantly higher than group 1 patients in the central (P = 0.03), right (P = 0.03) and left (P = 0.007) positions. In group 3 the sensitivity was greater within the stoma at the level of the abdominal wall muscle than intra-abdominally or subcutaneously, again suggesting an extra-colonic origin of the sensation. The sensitivity threshold was significantly greater with the electrode wrapped in gauze (P < 0.01), and loss of mucosal contact was not detected by the EMG machine. Therefore RME testing would seem not to measure mucosal sensitivity, and is probably influenced by the presence of faeces.
authors.affiliation: Colorectal Unit, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: A P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Meagher
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Kennedy
authors.forename: D Z
authors.initials: DZ
authors.lastname: Lubowski
mesh_terms: D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005243:Feces; D006801:Humans; D007413:Intestinal Mucosa / Q000503:physiopathology*; D012007:Rectum / Q000503:physiopathology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012677:Sensation; D012684:Sensory Thresholds