Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients.
The purpose of the study is to present our experience and compare the results of the three types of ports used as a central venous access and performed in the radiology suite. Between March 1989 and November 1993 we performed 288 implantations (100 Implantofix Seldinger, 100 plastic Hickman port, and 88 stainless steel Port-a-cath) for chemotherapeutic treatment on the same number of patients diagnosed as having cancer. In all cases access was obtained via a subclavian vein (the left one in 185 cases and the right one in 103). All the system ports were implanted in the radiology suite. In all cases the procedure was successfully performed. Complications occurred in 26.3% of cases, most notably thrombosis in 13 cases (4.5%) and infection in 12 cases (4.1%). Duration of the port systems placement varied between 17 and 1467 days (a mean of 315 days). A total of 133 systems have been removed to date, 80 (60.%) due to termination of chemotherapy, and 53(40%) for treatment of complications. Significant differences (complications and port duration time) were not observed between the three types of reservoir used. Subcutaneous ports are safe, comfortable, and effective devices for central venous access.
de Gregorio
M A
MA
Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Zaragoza, Spain.
Miguelena
J M
JM
Fernández
J A
JA
de Gregorio
C
C
Tres
A
A
Alfonso
E R
ER
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000295:instrumentation*; D002408:Catheters, Indwelling; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital; D012189:Retrospective Studies
D000970:Antineoplastic Agents