title: Prevalence and sources of patients' unmet expectations for care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patients' expectations and the role they play in medical care are increasingly considered to be important, but the factors that influence these expectations have not been well studied.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the factors that influence patients' expectations for care in office practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  Qualitative inquiry nested within a large clinical survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three general internal medicine practices in one mid-sized city in northern California.
  
  
  METHODS
  688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86%); 88 patients who reported one or more omissions of care on a post-visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were included in the qualitative inquiry.
  
  
  METHODS
  Proportion of surveyed patients who reported one or more omissions of care, and qualitative analysis of the sources of patients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews. Interviews focused on the sources of expectations and perceptions of omission. Using an iterative process and working by consensus, investigators developed coding categories on a randomly selected 50% of the transcripts. The other 50% of the sample was used for validation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 125 patients who had unmet expectations perceived omissions that were related to physician preparation for the visit (23%), history taking (26%), physical examination (30%), diagnostic testing (28%), prescription of medication (19%), referral to specialists (26%), and physician-patient communication (15%). Unmet expectations were shaped by patients' current somatic symptoms (intensity of symptoms, functional impairment, duration of symptoms, and perceived seriousness of symptoms) (74%); perceived vulnerability to illness (related to age, family history, personal lifestyle, or previously diagnosed conditions) (50%); past experiences (personal or familial) with similar illnesses (42%); and knowledge acquired from physicians, friends, family, or the media (54%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients' expectations for care are derived from multiple sources; their complexity should discourage simple schemes for "demand management." Nevertheless, the results of this study may help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise more successful strategies for clinical negotiation.
authors.affiliation: University of California, Davis, Division of General Medicine, Sacramento 95817, USA.
authors.forename: R L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Kravitz
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Callahan
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Paterniti
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Antonius
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dunham
authors.forename: C E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Lewis
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002140:California; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007388:Internal Medicine; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008329:Managed Care Programs; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations