title: CDR Review's editorial process: a survey of papers published in 1995.
abstract: Readers and authors of scientific material need and deserve to know how journal editors select and prepare papers for publication. Editors need to keep track of their procedures to avoid delay and ensure that there is always material to publish. This paper presents data on the time taken for the 48 papers published in the Communicable Disease Report Review in 1995 to be processed. The mean time from receipt to publication was five months. All papers were sent out to at least one referee and most to two. This paper describes the editorial process and suggests the adoption of blinded peer review.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Handysides
mesh_terms: D004739:England; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000379:methods; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011643:Publishing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013997:Time Factors