title: Comparison of endovascular and conventional vascular prostheses in an experimental infection model.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The causes and management of prosthetic graft infections have been extensively studied for conventional bypass grafts; however, the infectivity and therapy for endovascular graft infections are completely unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the biologic properties of infected aortic grafts when inserted by endoluminal or standard transabdominal techniques.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eighteen dogs underwent placement of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in their infrarenal aortas either by an endovascular technique (8) or a standard interposition technique (10). Endovascular grafts were constructed from polytetrafluoroethylene (3 cm) and two balloon-expandable stents coaxially mounted onto a balloon catheter delivery system. The grafts were inserted through a left carotid arteriotomy under fluoroscopic control. Initially, seven grafts were infected with decreasing inocula of Staphylococcus aureus, starting at 10(7) organisms per ml for 30 minutes and then rinsed briefly (10 seconds) in normal saline solution, until a 50% infective dose for the standard grafts was determined to be 10(2) organisms per ml. After this initial experiment, a second group of 11 dogs were compared at a concentration of 10(2) S. aureus per ml. Five dogs underwent endovascular repair, and six dogs had standard graft interpositions after an identical period of bacterial exposure. All grafts were removed at 2 weeks under sterile conditions and were submitted for quantitative culture analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Three of the six dogs (50%) with standard grafts appeared to clear their infections, whereas only one of the five dogs (20%) with an endovascular graft was free of organisms at 14 days. This results was further manifested by statistically significant lower postmortem colony counts in the standard grafts (p < 0.01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The endoluminal position of the graft and its proximity to the arterial wall do not appear to provide protection against infection. These data suggest that if endovascular grafts become infected, they may be in a disadvantaged position for host defense mechanisms to be effective.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, University Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10467, USA.
authors.forename: R E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Parsons
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Sanchez
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Marin
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Holbrook
authors.forename: P L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Faries
authors.forename: W D
authors.initials: WD
authors.lastname: Suggs
authors.forename: R T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Lyon
authors.forename: F D
authors.initials: FD
authors.lastname: Lowy
authors.forename: F J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Veith
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001012:Aorta, Abdominal / Q000601:surgery; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects*; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D004285:Dogs; D005260:Female; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000209:etiology* / Q000276:immunology / Q000473:pathology; D013203:Staphylococcal Infections / Q000209:etiology* / Q000276:immunology / Q000473:pathology; D013211:Staphylococcus aureus / Q000254:growth & development; D015607:Stents
chemical_list: D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene