title: Diaphragm function in patients with cervical cord injury or prior poliomyelitis infection.
abstract: Diaphragm function was evaluated in cervical cord injury patients (CCI), 1-3 years after injury (CCI(1-3)) and 10 years or more after injury (CCI(> or = 10)), as well as in a group of prior poliomyelitis infection patients (PPI), requiring intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) for about 6 h per night. Measurements included transdiaphragmatic pressure swings (delta Pdi) at rest, during maximal inspiratory efforts against closed airways (delta Pdi(max)) and during sniff manoeuvres (ie maximal inhalation through the nose, delta Pdi(sniff)), vital capacity normalized to age and height (VC(%pred)), tidal volume (Vt), relative inspiratory time (Ti/Ttot), breathing frequency (f(b)), and the tension-time index of the diaphragm (TTdi = delta Pdi/delta Pdi(max) x Ti/Ttot). The median VC(%pred) was 50% in the CCI(1-3) group and 57% in the CCI (> or = 10) group, but only 28% in the PPI group. Delta Pdi(max) values were similar for the CCI(1-3) (11.8 kPa) and CCI(> or = 10) (11.9 kPa) groups but were lower (71. kPa) in the PPI group. Due to the reduction in delta Pdi(max), the PPI group had higher delta Pdi/delta Pdi(max) values than the CCI groups, however, the TTdi was similar amongst the different groups studied. A submaximal exercise test in five cervical cord injury patients and in five polio patients with similar delta Pdi(max), delta Pdi(sniff) and TTdi values at rest revealed clear group differences with respect to force development, in that CCI patients showed significant increases in TTdi, while PPI demonstrated only minor changes. In CCI patients, an increase in ventilation was accompanied by an increase in delta Pdi/delta Pdi(max) while in contrast, the PPI patients showed no increase in delta Pdi/delta Pdi(max). We conclude that CCI patients, both recently and previously injured, have a similar maximal inspiratory force and are less impaired than the PPI patients. The TTdi at rest is similar in all groups, but the PPI patients react to inspiratory loads with little increases in TTdi, while the CCI patients increase their TTdi above fatiguing (0.15) levels. The different behaviours may be linked to loss of sensory pathways in the CCI patients.
authors.affiliation: Spinal Injuries Unit, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sinderby
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weinberg
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Sullivan
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Borg
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lindström
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Grassino
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002404:Catheterization; D003964:Diaphragm / Q000503:physiopathology*; D004576:Electromyography; D004947:Esophagus / Q000503:physiopathology; D015444:Exercise / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D011051:Poliomyelitis / Q000503:physiopathology*; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics / Q000502:physiology; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology*; D013270:Stomach / Q000503:physiopathology; D014797:Vital Capacity / Q000502:physiology