[The importance of quality of whole blood and erythrocyte concentrates for autologous transfusion. A literature survey and meta-analysis of in vivo erythrocyte recovery].
The separation of whole blood into components is the state-of-the-art in transfusion of allogeneic blood. The main reasons are the negative effects of the buffy coat and the need for FFP. Nevertheless, especially in Germany whole blood is being rejected more and more even as autologous blood. However, most of the negative effects of the buffy coat do not apply to autologous blood. Additionally, these patients usually do not develop coagulation disorders and therefore do not need plasma as a hemostatic component. On the other hand, separation into components of autologous blood leads to an increase of costs and to logistic problems that restrict autologous blood predeposit to a few institutions. Therefore, we have reviewed the literature in order to find a scientific basis for this.


METHODS
We analysed all articles listed by MEDLINE during the last 12 years that dealt with the quality of whole blood or red cell concentrates. In addition, all references were included that contributed relevant information to the topic. A total of 135 original articles, abstracts, reviews, letters or editorials were analysed that referred to standard preparations and storage media. In 48 papers the in vivo red cell survival was studied. 28 of which fulfilled the prerequisites to be included into a meta-analysis. The following in vitro parameters were also evaluated: pH, potassium load of the units, ATP and DPG concentration of the red cells.


CONCLUSIONS
Whole blood (resuspended in CPDA-1) and red cell units (stabilized in CPDA-1 or additive solutions) with a different buffy coat or leucocyte content have comparable pH values and red cell 2,3-DPG and ATP concentrations at the end of the approved storage time. The potassium load of a whole blood unit appears to be higher than red cell concentrates, but this is to some extent caused by the higher plasma content of whole blood and is not thought to be a clinically relevant problem for patients receiving only a few units. A number of studies demonstrate that dependent upon the leucocyte content of a red cell unit, leucocyte metabolites and enzymes are released and accumulate during storage. A detrimental influence on the integrity of the red cell membrane was found in several in vitro studies. Nevertheless, a significant improvement in red cell survival by leucocyte reduction was detected by only one group. Undoubtedly, nonhemolytic febrile transfusion reactions (NHFTR) are generally caused by an antibody-antigen interaction due to the transfusion of allogeneic buffy coat. On the other hand, there is some evidence that non-specific immunological mechanisms such as the release of histamine or cytokines are also capable of causing NHFTR. Thus, these reactions are expected to occur in autologous blood transfusion. However, so far, there are no data about the frequency and severity of these reactions and whether they are more likely to emerge after transfusion of blood units with a particular preparation. Blood transfusions can cause septic complications due to bacterial contamination of the transfused units. These fatal but rare complications may be reduced by pre-storage filtration of blood, but there is no indication that buffy coat reduction is effective. Three cases with septic complications have been reported after autologous transfusion, in two of which red cell concentrates (at least one was free of buffy coat) had been used. Thus, there is no justification for the conclusion that the risk of septic complications is increased by transfusion of whole blood. After all, whole blood and red cell concentrates exhibit only minor differences in relevant in vitro parameters. Hence, a higher incidence of adverse effects following the transfusion of autologous whole blood compared to autologous red cell concentrations is unlikely. Therefore, the 24 h in vivo recovery is considered to be the most valid criterion to assess the quality of red cell preparations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Karger
R
R
Abteilung für Transfusionsmedizin und Gerinnungsphysiologie, Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg.
Kretschmer
V
V
D001803:Blood Transfusion / Q000592:standards*; D001804:Blood Transfusion, Autologous / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards*; D002469:Cell Separation; D017707:Erythrocyte Transfusion / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards*; D004912:Erythrocytes / Q000737:chemistry / Q000201:enzymology; D006801:Humans; D011786:Quality Control; D065227:Transfusion Reaction
Die Bedeutung der Qualität von Vollblut und Erythrozytenkonzentraten für die Eigenbluttransfusion. Eine Literaturübersicht und Metaanalyse der Erythrozytenüberlebensraten in vivo.