title: Does neurological assessment still have a place in the NICU?
abstract: Comments at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit tend to concern porencephalic cysts or ventricular dilatation rather than clinical neurological findings. This neglect in collecting clinical information can be understood during the acute stage of neonatal adaptation due to the non-specificity and lability of many neurological signs. However, it does not seem justified when the infant has recovered, can breathe on his/her own and can tolerate handling. To define optimal Central Nervous System function at 40 weeks (just born or corrected), a simple basic assessment composed of nine variables is proposed, with descriptions and illustrations. Rationale for the timing and selection of variables is discussed. The benefit of this clinical approach is to subdivide children with normal ultrasound imaging into two subgroups according to non-optimal or optimal responses. Prospective follow-up of children with non-optimal responses will reduce the number of late diagnoses of developmental disabilities. Rational optimism for the others will diminish parents' anxiety and neurologic clinics' overload.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Maternity Hospital Port-Royal-Baudelocque, Paris, France.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Amiel-Tison
mesh_terms: D002493:Central Nervous System Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002658:Developmental Disabilities / Q000175:diagnosis; D004453:Echoencephalography; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007234:Infant, Premature; D007363:Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; D009460:Neurologic Examination / Q000379:methods*