title: [The value of ultrafast computerized tomography in detection of the patency of coronary bypasses].
abstract: Bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography (= Electron Beam Tomography, EBT) was examined in 72 bypass grafts (47 saphenous veins, 25 internal mammary arteries) in 30 patients and compared with coronary angiography. Angiography was performed a mean of 4.4 +/- 3.5 months (range 1-13) from the EBT examination. Contrast material (120 ml) was continuously administered via a peripheral vein and 40 axial slices (3 mm slice thickness, 110 ms scan time) without overlap sequences were obtained, ECG triggered with the single slice scanner mode. Imaging of internal mammary artery grafts began at the thoracic inlet, for saphenous vein grafts, at the undersurface of the aorta. Sixty of 63 angiographically patent bypass grafts were determined patent by EBT (sensitivity 95%), 8 bypass grafts could not be detected by EBT, and 9 were angiographically occluded (specificity 89%). Twenty-four of 25 internal mammary artery grafts were patent at EBT and coronary angiography, one was occluded. In 27 of the 30 patients (90%), all of the angiographically patent grafts could be confirmed as open with EBT. Obstructions of 10 grafts could not be visualized with EBT. Graft insertion into native coronary vessels could be visualized in axial slices, although morphologic quantification of graft insertion stenosis (75-90%) in two cases was not possible. Three dimensional reconstruction of the 40 axial slices allowed graft anatomy to be delineated. Visualization of bypass insertion into the native coronary vessel was less successful because of opacification of the left and right ventricle. Electron beam computed tomography is a minimally invasive procedure capable of evaluating the patency of saphenous vein and internal mammary artery grafts. The morphologic quantification of graft obstruction and visualization of the insertion of the bypasses into the native coronary vessels is less successful with present technology and imaging modalities.
authors.affiliation: Medizinische Klinik I Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Knez
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: von Smekal
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Haberl
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Spiegl
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Reichart
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Reiser
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Steinbeck
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000295:instrumentation; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass; D003326:Coronary Circulation / Q000502:physiology; D006083:Graft Occlusion, Vascular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009204:Myocardial Revascularization; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014680:Veins / Q000637:transplantation