Satisfaction with prescriptive authority protocols.
OBJECTIVE
The use of prescriptive authority protocols by pharmacists and physicians in Washington was described as to: (1) types of decisions made, frequency of use, and nature of working arrangements among participants; (2) their perceived impact on professional practice and care rendered to patients; and (3) their satisfaction with the protocol arrangements.


METHODS
A mail survey of participants currently engaged in prescriptive authority was conducted.


RESULTS
Responses were received from participants in 44 of 57 protocols. A total of 135 prescribers and 84 pharmacists responded. On average, 7 pharmacists and 27 prescribers were involved in each protocol, and had been involved for 6 years or more. It was estimated that approximately 10% of all active practitioners participated in protocols. Most protocols involved continuation of drug therapy or authorizing renewals. Modification of therapy (usually involving dosage or dose from changes) was practiced in two-thirds of the protocols, and initiation of therapy in about half of them. Most existed within managed care and group practice settings. Most prescribers (98%) and pharmacists (95%) were satisfied with protocol arrangements. Additionally, they generally agreed that the protocols increase patient convenience and increase the quality of patient care, and they encouraged their colleagues to use prescribing protocols.


CONCLUSIONS
Protocol arrangements appear to be working well from the perspective of participants. Based on this experience, the authors encourage the development of similar protocol arrangements in other states.
Fuller
T S
TS
University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, USA.
Christensen
D B
DB
Williams
D H
DH
D002985:Clinical Protocols; D011307:Drug Prescriptions; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D010595:Pharmacists / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014861:Washington