Pavlov's position toward Konorski and Miller's distinction between Pavlovian and motor conditioning paradigms.
Two Warsaw medical students, Jerzy Konorski and Stefan Miller, having read I.P. Pavlov's works on conditional reflexes, informed him in a 1928 letter that they had discovered a new type of conditioning. A previously neutral stimulus preceded the passive lifting of a dog's paw which then was followed by feeding; this stimulus then evoked the spontaneous raising of that paw. Pavlov responded informing them that their conditioning of motor responses expanded his theory of higher nervous activity, but that their conditioning paradigm-that they named CRII-did not differ fundamentally from the Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. The replication of the Warsaw experiment in Pavlov's laboratory failed to provide unequivocal results. From 1931 to 1933, Konorski, working in Pavlov's Leningrad laboratory, further explored the parameters of CRII. Pavlov insisted that the conditioning of motor movements differs from the conditioning of other sensory analyzers only in that, on the neural level, the motor analyzer is both afferent, that is, perceptive, and efferent, that is, responsive. Konorski was not convinced, and he subsequently maintained that the two conditioning paradigms were fundamentally different.
Windholz
G
G
Dept. of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Charlotte 28223, USA.
Wyrwicka
W
W
D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D004285:Dogs; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D009043:Motor Activity; D011044:Poland