title: Freedom, responsibility, and health.
abstract: Freedom and responsibility, how much of each and how they are balanced, have profound implications for our personal lives and for our work. The health of a population and its achievement in the workplace are enhanced when individuals have some freedom and some responsibility, but not too much of either, and when civil associations of individuals rather than individuals acting alone are the essential social units. The consistent association of social contacts with health and productivity provides strong support for the premise that intimate relationships are the focus around which people's lives revolve. Membership of a "social network" may be merely conforming to a reigning social norm, and this could mean having to pay an important price in the loss of creativity associated with individualism. But social conformity should not prevent individuals from going their own way, and it should be possible to combine the luxury of individuality with an active life in civic affairs. Less than complete freedom may fall short of existential utopia, but it may be best for our health and wellbeing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School.
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Bunker
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Stansfeld
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Potter
mesh_terms: D005610:Freedom; D006262:Health; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D012919:Social Behavior; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012944:Social Support; D012951:Socialization