Effects of secondary curing on indirect posterior composite resins.
This study was designed to compare strength, elastic modulus (stiffness), and hardness for five composite resin materials that are used for laboratory-fabricated posterior composite restorations. Ten specimens of each material were processed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Statistical analysis indicated that there were significant differences in mechanical properties among the materials tested. In addition, materials that are incrementally light cured prior to secondary processing were tested for changes in mechanical properties following secondary processing. It was determined that secondary processing provided improvement in flexural strength (11%) when compared to samples that were only light cured.
Reinhardt
J W
JW
University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Boyer
D B
DB
Stephens
N H
NH
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001641:Bicuspid; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / Q000737:chemistry; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D004548:Elasticity; D006244:Hardness; D007284:Inlays; D008422:Materials Testing; D008963:Molar; D018583:Pliability; D019279:Resin Cements
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D003188:Composite Resins; C069352:Concept resin; D019279:Resin Cements; C046981:ESPE Visio-Gem; C065770:Herculite XR; C069353:Brilliant Dentin resin; C087243:CR Inlay Cement; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate