The relationship between audit, research and policy: lessons from a community paediatric audiology service.
The pace of medical change is in danger of paralysing the process of decision making, particularly in services where clinical improvements occur more slowly than the introduction of new interventions. Audit within an individual district enables staff to monitor progress towards desired goals and standards but rarely generates sufficient data to inform decision making about major policy changes. The paper describes how the findings from nine audits of a community paediatric audiology service over a 13-year period were combined with reviews of the literature, resulting in a series of changes to a children's audiological service. The interest and commitment of all the staff involved were maintained by involving them in the process and using them as a valuable source of qualitative data. Audit must be thorough and should be based on precise case definition and comprehensive casefinding if the results are to be meaningful. It is a more powerful means of achieving improvements in systems if it is combined with research evidence, and a readiness to change the system if the agreed goals are not being attained.
Fonseca
S
S
Department of Audiology, St George's Hospital Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Borgstein
B
B
Dobson
M
M
Hall
D
D
D015988:Cohort Effect; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006311:Hearing Disorders / Q000151:congenital* / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006320:Hearing Tests / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008131:London; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000379:methods*; D015997:Neonatal Screening / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D011050:Policy Making; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012307:Risk Factors