[A survey of the diffusion and impact of consensus development conference on infections caused by central venous catheters in an anesthesiologist team].
OBJECTIVE
To assess the diffusion and the impact on the professional practices of a consensus conference (CC) by the French speaking Society of Intensive Care on "Central venous catheter-related sepsis in intensive care".


METHODS
Before-after survey with two successive questionnaires.


METHODS
Two questionnaires (Q1 and Q2) were circulated either to intensivists (group 1) or to anaesthetists (group 2) of a University Hospital, before (Q1) and after (Q2) distribution of the CC conclusions. They aimed to assess the diffusion of the conclusions by the CC; the professional practices before the CC and their modifications after consideration of the recommendations by the CC.


RESULTS
Out of the 55 consulted, 85% answered Q1, and 71% Q2. Among them, 42% were aware of the conclusions of the CC before starting the survey-73.5% from group 1 and 28% from group 2. Therefore, conversely to anaesthetists, intensivists, did not significantly modify their professional practices after consideration of the CC conclusions.


CONCLUSIONS
This study shows a satisfactory diffusion of the content of jury's recommendations among anesthetists whereas the impact was less satisfactory with intensivists. The impact of a CC could probably be improved by a better diffusion of the consensus statements and by the intervention of local linkmen.
Loeb
T
T
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, CHU de Rouen, hôpital Charles-Nicolle, France.
Kaeffer
N
N
Winckler
C
C
D000776:Anesthesiology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000009:adverse effects*; D003245:Consensus Statements as Topic; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007239:Infections / Q000209:etiology*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires