title: [Comparison of Gore-tex covered Ultraflex stent and bare Ultraflex stent: preliminary clinical results].
abstract: We clinically compared the covered Ultraflex stent and the bare Ultraflex stent for malignant esophageal strictures. Materials were 6 cases with esophageal carcinomas. We placed the Gore-tex covered stents (A group) in 4 cases including 2 cases of esophagorespiratory fistulae, and the bare stents (B group) in 2 cases. The stents were well-expanded in all cases. After stenting, dysphagia was improved in all cases. Fistulae were obstructed by the cover in 2 cases in A group. Mean survival term was 123 days in A group and 45 days in B group. Complications were fistulation of bare portion of the covered stent in one case in A group, and tumor bleeding in one case in B group. Considering of the risk of fistula or tumor bleeding, the cover is necessary to increase the safety and efficacy of the esophageal stent.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Wakayama Medical College.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sonomura
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kishi
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sato
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kimura
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Terada
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shioyama
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Nishida
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Takeuchi
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004937:Esophageal Fistula / Q000628:therapy; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000150:complications; D004940:Esophageal Stenosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015607:Stents