title: The Pyloritek test and the CLO test: accuracy and incremental cost analysis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study was to compare the Pyloritek test (a 1-h rapid urease test) to the widely used CLO test.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-one patients undergoing upper endoscopy were studied. All patients gave informed consent. A single antral biopsy specimen was obtained for the CLO test, and another was obtained for the Pyloritek test. Additional specimens were obtained for culture and processed in the event of a discordant result. The Pyloritek assay was read at 1 h by one observer. The CLO test was read at 24 h by an observer blinded to the results of the Pyloritek assay.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 18 males and 53 females, and the mean age (+/- SEM) was 53 +/- 17 yr. Thirty-two patients had a positive result on the CLO test, and 39 had a negative test result. Of the 32 patients with a positive CLO test result at 24 h, 31 were positive by the Pyloritek test at 1 h. All 39 patients with negative CLO test results had negative Pyloritek test results as well. There was one discordant result, a negative Pyloritek test result and a positive CLO test result. Culture demonstrated growth of Helicobacter pylori. The kappa value, a measure of the reliability of the Pyloritek test compared with the CLO test, was 0.972 (SE, 0.0284; 95% confidence interval, 0.925-1). Marginal cost-effectiveness analysis favored the Pyloritek test.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results of the Pyloritek test at 1 h and the CLO test at 24 h are comparable in terms of detection of urease activity.
authors.affiliation: University of Wisconsin Medical School, Milwaukee, USA.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Puetz
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Vakil
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Phadnis
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Dunn
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Robinson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000641:Ammonia / Q000032:analysis; D001706:Biopsy; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D016481:Helicobacter Infections / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics; D016480:Helicobacter pylori / Q000201:enzymology*; D006801:Humans; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011706:Pyloric Antrum / Q000473:pathology; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013997:Time Factors; D014510:Urease / Q000032:analysis*
chemical_list: D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; D000641:Ammonia; D014510:Urease