Asymmetries and errors in perception of depth from disparity suggest a multicomponent model of disparity processing.
In three experiments, asymmetries between the processing of crossed and uncrossed disparities were investigated. The target was a luminance-defined circle concentric to a fixation mark, viewed stereoscopically on a computer monitor for 105 msec. Fifteen disparities were presented according to the method of constant stimuli. Observers indicated the apparent direction of target depth relative to fixation. All experiments measured both the accuracy and latency of this response. Experiment 1 showed fewer errors and shorter reaction times for identifying crossed disparities. Experiments 2 and 3 replicated Experiment 1 and also showed that observers may often perceive a target in the direction opposite that prescribed by the disparity information. We propose that the asymmetries and reversals result from differences in computation of sign, not of magnitude. This notion is consistent with a scheme of continuous disparity tuning and accounts for such asymmetries and errors without positing disparity pooling mechanisms.
Landers
D D
DD
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin 78712-1189, USA. slanders@mail.utexas.edu
Cormack
L K
LK
D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D003867:Depth Perception; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D015357:Vision Disparity