title: [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint].
abstract: Medical lability actions do rarely without expert assessment. The basic rule of free evidence recognition applies for the evaluation of conflicting expert assessments which forces the judge to examine closely. It is reported about formal mistakes of an expert assessment and the appropriate handling of different expert assessments.
authors.affiliation: Vorsitzender Richter am OLG, Münster.
authors.forename: F J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Pelz
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
vernacular_title: Kollidierende Gutachten aus juristischer Sicht.