A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of office versus hospital hysteroscopy.
OBJECTIVE
To compare office hysteroscopy with suction biopsy versus the hospital procedure with respect to clinical outcomes, success rates, and cost.


METHODS
Retrospective review of outpatient and inpatient records for all attempted office hysteroscopies with suction biopsy from September 1991 to June 1995, and all hospital diagnostic hysteroscopies with dilatation curettage from January 1993 to June 1994.


METHODS
Multispeciality office group practice and a university-affiliated private hospital.


METHODS
Four hundred seventy-three women who had office hysteroscopy with suction biopsy and 95 who had hospital diagnostic hysteroscopy with dilatation curettage.


METHODS
The procedures were performed by 13 gynecologists who had no experience with office hysteroscopy.


RESULTS
A cost analysis was completed by obtaining hospital and anesthesia charges for the hospital procedures and comparing them with office, instrument repair, and capital equipment costs. Gynecologists' professional fees were excluded from the analysis since they were the same in both settings. The overall failure rates to complete office and hospital hysteroscopies were 7.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Abnormal uterine bleeding was the indication in 89% of office and 96% of hospital procedures. Office hysteroscopy in these women revealed an abnormality in 40.1% of office versus 38.5% of hospital procedures. Histology revealed insufficient tissue for diagnosis in 3.4% office and 22.1% hospital procedures. The minor complication rate for office hysteroscopy was 1.9% and for hospital hysteroscopy 4.2%. There were no major complications in either group. The mean charges, excluding professional fees, for the hospital were $1799 versus $62 for office hysteroscopy.


CONCLUSIONS
Office hysteroscopy has a high success rate and a low complication rate even when performed by a group of gynecologists with limited experience in the procedure. Because of its lower cost and greater diagnostic accuracy, office hysteroscopy with suction biopsy should be the method of choice for evaluating gynecologic conditions such as abnormal bleeding.
Hidlebaugh
D
D
100 Central Street, Worcester, MA 01608, USA.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001707:Biopsy, Needle / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004107:Dilatation and Curettage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D015907:Hysteroscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010824:Physicians' Offices; D017698:Postmenopause; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014592:Uterine Hemorrhage / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy