title: Is community-led maternity care a feasible option for women assessed at low risk and those with complicated pregnancies? Results of a population based study in south Camden, London.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  to assess the feasibility of obstetric offering community-led maternity care to most women, both those assessed to be at low obstetric risk and those with complicated pregnancies at 'booking'. Community-led care is defined as appropriate care by community midwives and general practitioners during pregnancy, birth and the puerperium, with routine hospital care kept to a minimum.
  
  
  METHODS
  observational study.
  
  
  METHODS
  South Camden, London, UK: University College Obstetric Hospital and community.
  
  
  METHODS
  453 women, resident in South Camden, including those 'booked' for home births, who were 'booked' for maternity care at University College Hospital between October 1993 and April 1994.
  
  
  RESULTS
  this paper assesses the extent to which community midwives and general practitioners were able to give local women community-led care and describes the amount of care provided to women by their 'named' community midwives and team. Most local women were eligible for community-led care and 85% planned to have it. The majority of care was given by the community midwives, but the amount of hospital input varied. Women who remained at low obstetric risk generally had their antenatal care in the community, only attending hospital for two or three routine assessments and occasional extra referrals. Women attending hospital more frequently usually had a complicated pregnancy. Care given by a woman's 'named' midwives was generally provided antenatally, but care from familiar midwives was less common in labour and postnatally.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  community-led maternity care can be provided to the majority of women, even those with a complicated pregnancy, as long as specialist opinion and facilities are accessible and women are referred as necessary. Although the majority of women had access to local antenatal care from staff they got to know, the 'named' community midwives and teams found it difficult to provide comprehensive care, particularly to the women who developed complications, so priorities need to be established. Further research is needed to compare alternative models of care and their costs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, UK.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fleissig
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kroll
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: McCarthy
mesh_terms: D003152:Community Health Nursing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005194:Family Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008131:London; D009721:Nurse Midwives / Q000458:organization & administration*; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000451:nursing*