title: Determining whether causal order affects cue selection in human contingency learning: comments on Shanks and Lopez (1996)
abstract: Shanks and Lopez (1996) reported three experiments in which they attempted to test whether causal order affects cue selection, and concluded that it does not. Their study provides an opportunity to highlight some basic methodological criteria that must be met in order to test whether and how causal order influences learning. In particular, it is necessary to (1) ensure that participants consistently interpret the learning situation in terms of directed cause-effect relations; (2) measure the causal knowledge they acquire; (3) manipulate causal order; and (4) control the statistical relations between cause and effect. With respect to these criteria, each experiment reported by Shanks and Lopez fails on multiple counts. Moreover, several aspects of the results reported by Shanks and Lopez are explained by causal-model theory, but not by associative accounts. Their study thus adds to a growing body of evidence from different laboratories indicating that human contingency learning can be guided by causal interpretation.
authors.affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany. waldmann@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Waldmann
authors.forename: K J
authors.initials: KJ
authors.lastname: Holyoak
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D011939:Mental Recall; D011340:Problem Solving