Theory, explanation, and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology.
Efforts at cumulative knowledge building in social gerontology have been lax, judging from research articles published in journals between 1990 and 1994. Too little attention has been paid to the cumulative development of theory; readers are left with many empirical generalizations but underdeveloped explanations by which to interpret findings and build upon them in subsequent research. To assist future theory development in social gerontology, we review seven theoretical perspectives referenced most frequently in recent journals: (1) social constructionist, (2) social exchange, (3) life course, (4) feminist, (5) age stratification (age and society), (6) political economy of aging, and (7) critical theory. We suggest that, taken together, these represent a "third generation" of explanation in social gerontology, noting their debt to older and more established traditions in social science theory. We argue that authors and journal reviewers should place more emphasis on theory development - which means, most simply, the construction of explicit explanations in accounting for empirical findings - if knowledge development about social aspects of aging is to be cumulative, systematic, and incremental.
Bengtson
V L
VL
University of Southern California, USA.
Burgess
E O
EO
Parrott
T M
TM
D000375:Aging / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D005853:Geriatrics; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011057:Politics; D012107:Research Design; D012919:Social Behavior; D012961:Sociology