On assumptions of, relations between, and evaluations of some process dissociation measurement models.
In this article, we analyze both M. J. Wainwright and E. M. Reingold's (1996) view of the process dissociation measurement models presented by A. Buchner, E. Erdfelder, and B. Vaterrodt-Plünnecke (1995) and their suggestions on that topic. This analysis reveals a number of problems in Wainwright and Reingold's approach. Some of these problems are more subtle than others; but they are nevertheless consequential. Thus, researchers working with the process dissociation procedure should be aware of these problems.
Buchner
A
A
Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Germany. buchner@cogpsy.uni-trier.de
Erdfelder
E
E
D001364:Awareness; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011594:Psychometrics