Nickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques.
The aim of this study was to compare two intra-oral molar distalization procedures, involving 15 cases with Class II molar relationships. Magnetic devices were applied to the upper right first molars in each case, while nickel-titanium coil springs were used against the upper left first molars, for a period of 3 months. Measurements were made from lateral cephalograms and from photocopies of models taken before and after the distalization procedure. Although upper molar distalization was achieved with ease in both techniques, nickel-titanium coil springs were found to be the more effective in terms of movement achieved.
Erverdi
N
N
Marmara University School of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Koyutürk
O
O
Küçükkeles
N
N
D002508:Cephalometry; D002648:Child; D003722:Dental Alloys; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008280:Magnetics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D008297:Male; D008312:Malocclusion, Angle Class II / Q000628:therapy; D008437:Maxilla; D003765:Models, Dental; D008963:Molar; D009532:Nickel; D016382:Orthodontic Appliance Design; D009967:Orthodontic Appliances; D014025:Titanium; D014087:Tooth Movement Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation*
D003722:Dental Alloys; C040654:titanium nickelide; D009532:Nickel; D014025:Titanium