Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results.
OBJECTIVE
Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals often exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We studied the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two large, distinctive cohorts.


METHODS
Patients with two or more satisfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were selected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (days) (< or = 45, 46-90, 91-120, > 120) and compared statistically.


RESULTS
The distribution of differences between results for the short-interval subsets (< 120) was significantly different (P < .01) from the interval subset > 120 days. At short intervals the results revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the initial smear and concurrent biopsies.


CONCLUSIONS
Rapidly repeated cervical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleading. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is < 45 days. Colposcopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an abnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.
Bishop
J W
JW
Department of Pathology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Hartinger
J S
JS
Pawlick
G F
GF
D001706:Biopsy; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013997:Time Factors; D002577:Uterine Cervical Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*