title: [Endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplasty in comparison with conventional surgical procedures--a prospective controlled study].
abstract: This study compares the extraperitoneal endoscopic hernia repair (TEP, n = 96) with the technique according to Shouldice (n = 128). Intraoperatively, the rate of complications increased during the first TEP procedures, whereas the conventional procedure showed no complications. However, the TEP patients' showed significantly more comfort compared to the Shouldice technique, meaning less pain and earlier return to normal activity.
authors.affiliation: Chirurgische Abteilung, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Haug-Gebhard
authors.forename: H P
authors.initials: HP
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ehlich
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thiede
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Gerngross
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006552:Hernia, Inguinal / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000209:etiology; D011126:Polypropylenes; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012008:Recurrence; D012086:Reoperation; D013526:Surgical Mesh
chemical_list: D011126:Polypropylenes
vernacular_title: Die endoskopische extraperitoneale Hernioplastik im Vergleich zu konventionellen Operationsverfahren--eine prospektiv kontrollierte Studie.