title: Effect of focus lateralization on memory assessment during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure.
abstract: Despite the use of stimuli that can be processed by both hemispheres, a number of studies have reported lower memory scores after the left intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) than after the right IAP. Because of that, failure after ipsilateral IAP is observed more often in patients with a left temporal seizure focus (LT) than in right temporal patients (RT), possibly needlessly excluding some LT patients from surgery. In order to overcome the deleterious effects of anesthetizing the dominant hemisphere, we designed an IAP protocol that did not promote verbal encoding of the stimuli. For this purpose, a large number of visual and tactile stimuli (colored pictures and real objects) were presented to be recognized later. The effect of seizure focus lateralization was examined in 82 temporal lobe epileptic patients who underwent IAP as part of their presurgical evaluation. As expected, for both RT and LT patients, long-term recognition of pictures presented under the effect of amobarbital was highly sensitive to the presence of a contralateral epileptic focus. However, contrary to what is generally reported, LT patients performed better than RT patients when their left (ipsilateral) hemisphere was anesthetized. In RT patients, although memory scores were lower after the left contralateral injection, the disparity in memory scores between the right and left injection was not as marked as in LT patients. These results are discussed in terms of the influence of type of processing required during the initial encoding on later recognition during IAP.
authors.affiliation: Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Canada.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Rouleau
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Robidoux
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Labrecque
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Denault
mesh_terms: D000654:Amobarbital; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology*; D004833:Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D008569:Memory Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D009484:Neuropsychology / Q000379:methods*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D013236:Stereognosis / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives; D000654:Amobarbital