title: Oral propafenone to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with and without underlying heart disease. A randomized, controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The effectiveness of oral propafenone in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm has been established by controlled trials. However, it is not clear whether the effectiveness of propafenone is affected by the presence or absence of underlying heart disease.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the safety and effectiveness of oral propafenone and the role of underlying heart disease.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized, single-blind, controlled study.
  
  
  METHODS
  3 teaching hospitals.
  
  
  METHODS
  240 hospitalized patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Propafenone (one 500-mg oral dose) or placebo.
  
  
  METHODS
  Conversion rates at 3 and 8 hours.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Propafenone was more effective than placebo for converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm at 3 hours: Fifty-four of 119 patients (45%) receiving propafenone and 22 of 121 patients (18%) receiving placebo had conversion (P < 0.001). It was also more effective at 8 hours: Ninety-one of 119 patients (76%) receiving propafenone and 45 of 121 patients (37%) receiving placebo had conversion (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that among patients without heart disease, 78% of those receiving propafenone and 56% of those receiving placebo converted to sinus rhythm within 8 hours (P = 0.02). In those with hypertension, the rate was 70% for those receiving propafenone and 27% for those receiving placebo (P < 0.001); in patients with structural heart disease, the rate was 81% for those receiving propafenone and 17% for those receiving placebo (P < 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Oral loading of propafenone was more effective than placebo for conversion to sinus rhythm within 8 hours and had a favorable safety profile. The rate of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm was higher in patients without structural heart disease; this finding has important implications for the assessment of drug effectiveness in recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
authors.affiliation: Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Boriani
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Biffi
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Capucci
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Botto
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Broffoni
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Rubino
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Della Casa
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sanguinetti
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Magnani
mesh_terms: D000284:Administration, Oral; D000889:Anti-Arrhythmia Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*; D006331:Heart Diseases / Q000150:complications*; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000150:complications; D008875:Middle Aged; D011405:Propafenone / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016037:Single-Blind Method
chemical_list: D000889:Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; D011405:Propafenone