The effect of filler content and processing variables on dimensional accuracy of experimental composite inlay material.
BACKGROUND
Dimensional accuracy of a composite inlay restoration is important to ensure an accurate fit and to minimize cementation stresses.


OBJECTIVE
A method was developed to measure dimensional accuracy and stability of a composite inlay.


METHODS
A standard Class II (MOD) inlay cavity stainless steel mold was made with six circular indentations placed on the occlusal floor of the cavity and four indentations on each gingival floor to act as datum points in the measurement of linear polymerization shrinkage. The inlay restorations were prepared from an inlay-onlay composite material of different filler contents (50%, 65%, and 79% by weight). For each filler content group, three curing methods were used: light curing only, light curing and heat curing at 100 degrees C for 5 minutes, and light curing and heat curing at 100 degrees C for 5 minutes and then storage in distilled water for 7 days. The accuracy of the MOD inlays was determined by measuring the shrinkage of the restoration on the occlusal floor areas and the gingival seats.


RESULTS
The results demonstrated an inverse linear relationship between filler content and polymerization shrinkage. There was a tendency for the light-curing and heat-curing method to show an increase in polymerization shrinkage. An expansion was recorded between the mesial and distal boxes when the specimens were soaked in water for 7 days.


CONCLUSIONS
This study suggested that the inlay mold limits the physical shrinkage that can occur between the mesial and distal axial walls of the inlay restoration because the inlay cannot shrink to a smaller dimension than the mold. Water sorption then causes hygroscopic expansion, which enlarges the distance between the mesial and distal walls.
Razak
A A
AA
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Harrison
A
A
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001464:Barium / Q000737:chemistry; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / Q000737:chemistry; D002484:Cementation; D055598:Chemical Phenomena; D002627:Chemistry, Physical; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry*; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents / Q000737:chemistry; D005898:Glass / Q000737:chemistry; D006358:Hot Temperature; D006801:Humans; D007284:Inlays; D008027:Light; D016014:Linear Models; D008422:Materials Testing; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols / Q000737:chemistry; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids / Q000737:chemistry; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D012822:Silicon Dioxide / Q000737:chemistry; D013193:Stainless Steel; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D014867:Water
D003188:Composite Resins; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D011108:Polymers; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D019279:Resin Cements; D014867:Water; D013193:Stainless Steel; C073466:Prisma APH; C020946:triethylene glycol dimethacrylate; D001464:Barium; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D012822:Silicon Dioxide