title: Office Microlaparoscopy Under Local Anesthesia
abstract: We assessed the utility, tolerance, and costs associated with office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia using fiberoptic microlaparoscopes (<2 mm) and accessory instrumentation (<2 mm) for 100 of the following procedures: diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate infertility including chromopertubation; diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), including biopsy of endometriosis and conscious pain mapping; and early second-look laparoscopy including lysis of adhesions. A prospective nonselected cohort study was conducted on all women with CPP or infertility who consented to office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia. A questionnaire was developed to follow all aspects of patient acceptance and tolerance of the procedures, and women were screened preoperatively, and 30 minutes and 1 week postoperatively. Pain was evaluated with modification of the McGill pain inventory relative intensity scale. A subset of questions evaluated the recovery period, and time and length of all aspects of the procedure and recovery were recorded. Second-look procedures were significantly more painful than diagnostic ones, and women with CPP experienced significantly greater pain than those with infertility. Virtually all expressed high satisfaction with the procedure. There were no complications, and no procedures required general anesthesia. Compared with traditional laparoscopy, there was a reduction in costs greater than 70%.
authors.affiliation: Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063.
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Palter
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Duleba
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Zreik
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: DiStasio
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Mandel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Guarnaccia
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Polcz
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Amesse
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Olive