title: Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The extent to which chemotherapy may relieve tumour-related symptoms, improve quality of life and prolong survival in patients with gastric cancer is not known in spite of the extensive use of this treatment modality. The aim of this study was to estimate any gain in the quantity and quality of life produced by chemotherapy in these patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between January 1991 and February 1995, 61 patients with gastric cancer were randomized to either chemotherapy in addition to best supportive care or to best supportive care. Chemotherapy was allowed in the latter group if the supportive measures did not lead to palliation. Chemotherapy was the ELF-regimen consisting of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and etoposide, or, in elderly patients with poor performance, a 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen (FLv). Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument.
  
  
  RESULTS
  More patients in the chemotherapy group (45%, 14/31) had an improved or prolonged high quality of life for a minimum period of 4 months compared to those in the best supportive care group (20%, 6/30, P < 0.05). A similar difference was seen in the treating physician's evaluation of whether the patient was subjectively improved or continued to do well for at least 4 months (17/31, 55% versus 6/30, 20%, P < 0.01). Overall survival was longer in the chemotherapy group (median 8 vs. 5 months) although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). After corrections for imbalances in pretreatment characteristics, chemotherapy treatment was, however, associated with a survival benefit (P = 0.003). Also, the quality-adjusted survival time and time to disease progression were longer for patients randomized to chemotherapy (median 5 vs. 2 months, P = 0.03).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results show that chemotherapy can add to both quantity and quality of life in advanced gastric cancer. The number of patients who benefit from treatment is, however, still rather limited.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oncology, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Glimelius
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ekström
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hoffman
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Graf
authors.forename: P O
authors.initials: PO
authors.lastname: Sjödén
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Haglund
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Svensson
authors.forename: L K
authors.initials: LK
authors.lastname: Enander
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Linné
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Sellström
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Heuman
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000628:therapy*; D000368:Aged; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005047:Etoposide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005260:Female; D005472:Fluorouracil / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006801:Humans; D002955:Leucovorin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D058766:Levoleucovorin; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011788:Quality of Life; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000628:therapy*; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D005047:Etoposide; D058766:Levoleucovorin; D002955:Leucovorin; D005472:Fluorouracil