title: Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data. I: Time needed for interpretation.
abstract: Four tabular and two graphical techniques for the presentation of laboratory test results were evaluated in a reaction-time experiment with 25 volunteers. Artificial variables and values were used to represent sets of 12 laboratory tests to eliminate the possible effects of clinical experience. Analyses focused on reaction times for correctly classified sets of data. For comparable data sets, Presentation Techniques (PT) that use color, always allow faster interpretation than PTs that do not use color, or use only a simple marker. Color-coded tables yielded an improvement in median reaction time of approximately six times or better, as compared to the reference PT (a tabular PT without any hints). For the color-coded graphs, the improvement rate was approximately 2.5 or better.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Verheij
authors.forename: J O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Hoeke
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bonke
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: van Strik
authors.forename: E S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Gelsema
mesh_terms: D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques; D003196:Computer Graphics; D003626:Data Display; D006801:Humans; D012984:Software