title: Inhalation induction with sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with propofol.
abstract: We conducted a randomized, double-blind comparison of 8% sevoflurane and propofol as induction agents for day-case cystoscopy in 102 patients. All patients received an i.v. cannula and breathed oxygen 5 litre min-1. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol i.v. or inhalation of 8% sevoflurane and 10% Intralipid (as a placebo) i.v., delivered by a blinded observer. Anaesthesia was maintained in all patients with 2% sevoflurane via a face mask. Induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane was significantly slower compared with propofol (mean 84 (SD 24) s vs 57 (11) s), but was associated with a lower incidence of apnoea (16% vs 65%) and a shorter time to establish spontaneous ventilation (94 (34) s vs 126 (79) s). Induction complications were uncommon in each group but the transition to maintenance was smoother with sevoflurane and was associated with less hypotension compared with propofol. Emergence from anaesthesia induced with sevoflurane occurred significantly earlier compared with propofol (5.2 (2.2) min vs 7.0 (3.2) min) and anaesthetic induction was also significantly cheaper with sevoflurane. According to a postoperative questionnaire, the majority of patients found both anaesthetic techniques acceptable. Nevertheless, significnatly more patients (14%) rated induction with sevoflurane as unpleasant compared with propofol (0) and significantly more patients (24%) would not choose sevoflurane induction compared with propofol (6%). This phenomenon may have been related to the particular patient population studied, however. Inhalation induction with 8% sevoflurane would appear to offer several objective advantages compared with induction with propofol in day-case patients, although a significant minority may dislike this technique.
authors.affiliation: North Staffordshire Hospitals, Stoke-on-Trent.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thwaites
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Edmends
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; D000768:Anesthesia, General / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology; D018685:Anesthetics, Inhalation; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000187:drug effects; D003558:Cystoscopy; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004987:Ethers; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008738:Methyl Ethers; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D015742:Propofol; D000077149:Sevoflurane
chemical_list: D018685:Anesthetics, Inhalation; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous; D004987:Ethers; D008738:Methyl Ethers; D000077149:Sevoflurane; D015742:Propofol