Audit in palliative care: does practice change?
This study aimed to document current palliative care initiatives, identify any reported changes in working practice as a result of audit, and determine the opinions of palliative care staff towards audit. All 31 established palliative care services within the former North West Thames Regional Health Authority were sent a brief postal questionnaire on previous and current audit activities. Of the 28 units who responded, most (78%, n = 21) were currently involved in audit with a further 7% (n = 2) planning to implement audit in the near future. Changes as a result of audit included implementation of standards, for example response to referrals; improvements in documentation, for example revision of case notes; and changes to unit practice, such as converting to multidisciplinary care plans. The respondents viewed the main advantage of carrying out any audit project as the improvement or maintenance of the quality of patient care. The principal disadvantage expressed was the time-consuming nature of audit. An audit with a clear aim and thorough design can provide valuable evidence upon which new policies or strategies in palliative care can be based. By educating and training staff in audit and illustrating the benefits, any concerns about carrying out audit could be addressed.
Higginson
I J
IJ
Kensington Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority, London, UK.
Hearn
J
J
Webb
D
D
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D008330:Management Audit; D008485:Medical Audit; D009731:Nursing Audit; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000458:organization & administration*