Late termination of pregnancy in North Holland.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the extent to which late termination of pregnancy (gestational period > 24 weeks) is practised, to find out what fetal diseases and abnormalities lead to termination and to obtain insight into the clinical judgement and decision-making process by gynaecologists with regard to termination.


METHODS
A retrospective study.


METHODS
Province of North Holland, The Netherlands.


METHODS
An anonymous printed questionnaire, was sent to all associations or departments of gynaecology in the 21 hospitals in North Holland. The period of study covered the years 1990 to 1994.


RESULTS
Completed questionnaires were received from 19 associations or departments in the 21 hospitals (90% response). In the five-year period under study in 14 of these hospitals had terminated 103 pregnancies beyond the 24th week of gestation. Antenatal sonography had been performed on all these pregnancies. Anencephaly was diagnosed before termination in 21% and severe chromosomal defects in a further 21%. Other severe abnormalities were neural groove defects, such as hydrocephaly and/or spina bifida (16%), no renal function (12%) and skeletal abnormalities (11%). In 87% the antenatal diagnosis was verified postnatally; in 78% this was done by autopsy. The diagnosis was confirmed in all these cases ('almost confirmed' in two cases). In every case the pregnant woman herself had asked for her pregnancy to be terminated. In 78% the prognosis was discussed with other medical specialists and the professionals concerned with management; there was a consultation about the termination in 91% of the cases. A report was always compiled for the medical records.


CONCLUSIONS
Late termination of pregnancy is practised on a substantial scale in North Holland. The reasons for termination were severe structural abnormalities which, in most cases, were not compatible with survival. The gynaecologists in North Holland dealt prudently and responsibly with late termination of pregnancy, although they did not always adhere to the guidelines set out in the 1994 report of the Netherlands Association for Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Bosma
J M
JM
Inspectorate of Health Care for North Holland, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
van der Wal
G
G
Hosman-Benjaminse
S L
SL
D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005315:Fetal Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005333:Fetus / Q000002:abnormalities; D006176:Gynecology; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D009426:Netherlands; D011247:Pregnancy; D011262:Pregnancy Trimester, Second; D011263:Pregnancy Trimester, Third; D011364:Professional Practice; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal