Water sorption and solubility of resin-modified polyalkenoate cements.
The purpose of this study was to compare the water sorption and solubility of several resin-modified polyalkenoate cements. The materials evaluated included Variglass used as a restoration, base on liner; Fuji II LC, Fuji Liner; Vitrebond; Vitremer and Photac-Bond. Z100, a composite resin, was used as control. All specimens were manipulated according to the manufacturers' instructions and then subjected to water sorption and solubility tests based on the ISO 4049 requirements. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Duncan's test at a 0.05 significance level. Results show that the composite resin control had significantly less water sorption than any of the resin-modified polyalkenoate cements evaluated. The degree of water sorption was product dependent and appeared to be influenced by the resin (HEMA) content. There was no apparent correlation between water sorption and solubility. Some of the resin-modified polyalkenoate cements retained water in their set structure and hence solubility could not be assessed.
Yap
A
A
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lee
C M
CM
D000042:Absorption; D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D008422:Materials Testing; D008689:Methacrylates; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D012995:Solubility; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014867:Water; D017155:Wettability; D015040:Zirconium
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D003188:Composite Resins; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D008689:Methacrylates; C088835:Photac-Bond; C081982:VariGlass VLC; C084550:Vitremer; C083568:Z100 composite resin; D014867:Water; C067790:Vitrabond; C084541:Fuji glass-ionomer lining cement; C005044:hydroxyethyl methacrylate; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D015040:Zirconium