title: What does locality commissioning in Avon offer? Retrospective descriptive evaluation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe the impact, direct costs of, and participants' attitudes to the first two years and eight months of locality commissioning in Avon.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective description of programme.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirteen localities in Avon Health Authority area, covering 982000 population and 147 general practices.
  
  
  METHODS
  Postal questionnaire survey of 147 general practitioners (one per practice); interviews with and questionnaire survey of 13 lead general practitioners and 13 so called link staff from the health authority.
  
  
  METHODS
  Locality initiatives, perceived influence, general practitioners' attitudes, management costs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty initiatives were identified that had changed services to patients, and another nine were planned. The commonest initiatives concerned primary mental health care (seven), nurse specialists for primary care of chronic diseases (three), referral and clinical practice guidelines (seven), and access to hospital outpatient departments (one, with two others planned). Localities were more likely to have influenced the authority, trust managers, and consultants than social services, community health councils, and voluntary organisations. Activity varied between localities, lead general practitioners estimating that 120/147 (82%) of practices had been involved in locality meetings (range 44-100% in different localities). The authority had spent 6 p per capita on running the scheme, and the total time used by general practitioners for locality commissioning was estimated at 1.5 whole time equivalents.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Locality commissioning has selectively changes services with limited extra funding and without delegation of hospital and community health service budgets. General practitioners wanted more policy and financial support. Further development should be based on evidence of costs, benefits, and limitations of locality commissioning schemes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Medicine, Avon Health Authority, Bristol.
authors.forename: C E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Hine
authors.forename: M O
authors.initials: MO
authors.lastname: Bachmann
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D018672:Community Health Planning / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004739:England; D005194:Family Practice / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006292:Health Priorities; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D013222:State Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration