Alloreactive delayed-type hypersensitivity in graft recipients: complexity of responses and divergence from acute rejection.
BACKGROUND
Immunocompetent allograft recipients typically exhibit evidence of sensitization to graft antigens through alloantibody production and allograft rejection, as well as delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactivity to donor antigens. Most previous studies have relied on whole donor splenocytes, which primarily elicit allorestricted allogeneic responses, to test specific DTH responses and overlook the independent element of self-restricted responses in host-allograft interactions.


METHODS
We tested expression of self-MHC-restricted versus allo-MHC-restricted allogeneic DTH responses in both nonimmunosuppressed and tolerized C57BL/6 mice. Mice were sensitized for allogeneic DTH either by rejection of skin or cardiac allografts, or by subcutaneous injection of intact allogeneic splenocytes. Patterns of alloreactive DTH were compared in allosensitized, tolerant, and naive hosts.


RESULTS
All three methods of allosensitization resulted in equivalent self-restricted and allorestricted allogeneic DTH responses in nonimmunosuppressed mice. Gallium nitrate blocked acute rejection of cardiac allografts, and also blocked allosensitization of both self-restricted and allorestricted DTH responses, but did not influence the expression of DTH responses in presensitized mice. Gallium nitrate treatment could not block acute rejection of skin allografts, but interfered with sensitization for self-restricted, but not allorestricted, DTH responses in these recipients. This divergence of self- versus allo-MHC-restricted allosensitization for DTH was observed in two additional situations: the rates of allosensitization for self-restricted versus allorestricted DTH, and the acquisition of allorestricted, but not self-restricted, alloreactive DTH responses in cardiac allograft tolerant mice subsequently challenged with a skin allograft.


CONCLUSIONS
These studies demonstrate that acute rejection correlates generally with allogeneic DTH, whereas tolerance is associated with a lack of alloreactive DTH. However, self-restricted and allorestricted allosensitization can operate independently in allograft recipients. Thus, the relationships between alloreactive DTH and graft-induced allosensitization, acute rejection, or tolerance are more complicated than previously appreciated.
Sirak
J
J
Department of Surgery/Transplant, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus 43210, USA.
Orosz
C G
CG
Wakely
E
E
VanBuskirk
A M
AM
D000818:Animals; D005708:Gallium / Q000494:pharmacology; D006084:Graft Rejection / Q000276:immunology*; D016027:Heart Transplantation / Q000276:immunology; D006968:Hypersensitivity, Delayed / Q000276:immunology*; D007114:Immunization; D007121:Immunocompetence; D007165:Immunosuppression Therapy; D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D007519:Isoantigens / Q000494:pharmacology; D008213:Lymphocyte Activation / Q000276:immunology; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D008811:Mice, Inbred DBA; D016038:Skin Transplantation / Q000276:immunology; D013601:T-Lymphocytes / Q000276:immunology; D013745:Tetanus Toxoid / Q000494:pharmacology
D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents; D007519:Isoantigens; D013745:Tetanus Toxoid; D005708:Gallium; C027235:gallium nitrate