title: Preoperative evaluation of the curative resectability of gastric cancer by abdominal computed tomography and ultrasonography: a prospective comparison study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We compared the ability of preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) with that of preoperative abdominal ultrasonography (US) in predicting the extent of tumor growth and the curative resectability of gastric cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Abdominal CT and US were done in 95 patients with gastric adeno-carcinoma. The radiologic findings were prospectively compared with surgical and pathologic findings.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The sensitivities of abdominal CT and US in detecting the perigastric lymph node involvement were 26.6% and 20%, respectively. The sensitivity of abdominal CT in predicting the pancreatic invasion (60%) was better than that of abdominal US (20%). However, there were 6 false positive diagnosis of pancreatic invasion by abdominal CT; in contrast, there was no false positive diagnosis of pancreatic invasion by abdominal US. Of 95 patients who underwent surgical exploration, 14 were found to have unresectable tumors because of extragastric organ involvement and distant metastases. Abdominal CT falsely predicted 8 of 14 cases in which curative gastric resection was impossible as resectable. Moreover, abdominal CT falsely predicted 5 of 81 cases in which curative gastric resection was possible as unresectable. Abdominal US falsely predicted 12 of 14 cases in which curative surgery was impossible as resectable.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preoperative abdominal Ct and US did not accurately predict the tumor extent and the curative resectability of the gastric cancer. Especially, abdominal CT finding of pancreatic invasion by gastric cancer should not be a contraindication for surgical exploration.
authors.affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: H C
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Jung
authors.forename: I S
authors.initials: IS
authors.lastname: Song
authors.forename: K W
authors.initials: KW
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.forename: C Y
authors.initials: CY
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: J K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: B I
authors.initials: BI
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: K U
authors.initials: KU
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: K J
authors.initials: KJ
authors.lastname: Choe
authors.forename: W H
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D000005:Abdomen / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000556:secondary / Q000601:surgery*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000556:secondary; D005260:Female; D005743:Gastrectomy; D006801:Humans; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000556:secondary; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000556:secondary; D010534:Peritoneal Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000556:secondary; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011300:Preoperative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014463:Ultrasonography