Haemodynamic effects of mechanical peritoneal retraction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
OBJECTIVE
Abdominal wall retraction (AWR) was recently proposed as an alternative for CO2 pneumoperitoneum. In this study we evaluated the cardiorespiratory effects of AWR during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


METHODS
Fifteen patients were studied during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using AWR. Monitoring included heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse oxymetry (SpO2), end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) minute ventilation, and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Using transoesophageal echocardiography, the transgastric short axis view was obtained to derive the end-diastolic area (EDA), the end-systolic area (ESA), and the ejection fraction (EF). These parameters were measured at predetermined periods: 1) five minutes after anaesthetic induction, 2) five minutes after AWR insertion, 3) 15 min after AWR insertion, and 4) after the end of surgery.


RESULTS
No change in any measured parameter was observed over time in the AWR group except for an increase in MAP (P < 0.05) after AWR insertion. There were no changes in EDA, ESA and EF during the study, reflecting stable global cardiac function. In addition, no embolic episodes were observed during surgery.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate that the use of gasless abdominal distention for laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in a stable haemodynamic profile in healthy patients without cardiac disease, except for a brief increase in MAP after the AWR insertion. The advantages of AWR over conventional pneumoperitoneum should be confirmed in higher risk patients in a prospective, randomized study.
Couture
P
P
Department of Anaesthesiology, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Québec, Canada. p.couture@sympatico.ca
Boudreault
D
D
Girard
F
F
Girard
D
D
Ratelle
R
R
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011028:Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial