A multicentre comparative evaluation of catheter valves.
Catheter valves are an alternative to leg bags for urine drainage, but no studies have yet been published which have compared the performance of different valves. This study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of the seven catheter valves available on the UK market in April 1996. The study was carried out by the Continence Products Evaluation (CPE) Network funded by the Medical Devices Agency (Department of Health). Each valve type was tested for 1 week by 19-36 cognitively unimpaired and manually dextrous subjects recruited from 11 test centres. At the end of each week, subjects completed an evaluation form (based on a three-point rating scale) to record product performance. The same catheter valves were also tested for ease of opening/closing by 33 subjects (mostly catheter users) who had some manual impairment. Performance scores varied widely between products. It was found that, to be successful, a valve needs to be easy to manipulate, leak-free, comfortable and inconspicuous. Prescribers need to be aware of the strengths and limitations of different valves for appropriate product selection.
Fader
M
M
CPE Network, St Pancras Hospital, London.
Pettersson
L
L
Brooks
R
R
Dean
G
G
Wells
M
M
Cottenden
A
A
Malone-Lee
J
J
D001294:Attitude to Health; D002408:Catheters, Indwelling / Q000592:standards* / Q000600:supply & distribution; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006804:Ergonomics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D014546:Urinary Catheterization / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000523:psychology