A prospective test of criteria for response, remission, relapse, recovery, and recurrence in depressed patients treated with cognitive behavior therapy.
The definitions that are commonly employed to describe the outcome of the depressive disorders are often used in inconsistent ways and remain largely untested. The lack of a standard and valid set of outcome definitions hinders the study of the naturalistic course and treatment of depressive disorders. In the present study, we operationalized definitions for response, remission, relapse, recovery, and recurrence and examined their validity in a sample of depressed patients treated with cognitive behavior therapy. Validity was evaluated by the ability of the definitions to predict subsequent outcome in acute treatment and during a 3 year follow-up period. All five definitions demonstrated moderate to excellent validity. Moreover, we were able to empirically distinguish response from remission, and relapse from recurrence, despite the frequent confusion of these terms in the literature. Several of the findings suggest that continued refinement of the outcome definitions may enhance validity even further.
Riso
L P
LP
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213, USA. risolp@msx.upmc.edu
Thase
M E
ME
Howland
R H
RH
Friedman
E S
ES
Simons
A D
AD
Tu
X M
XM
D000328:Adult; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012008:Recurrence; D016896:Treatment Outcome