title: Functional and morphological evaluation of canine veins following preservation in different storage media.
abstract: Injuries of endothelial and smooth muscle cells of autologous vein due to preservation in standard storage media may be responsible for graft failure. The effects of vein preservation with University of Wisconsin solution (UWs) on endothelial and smooth muscle cell function and morphology were compared to the effects of preservation with autologous whole blood (AWB) and normal saline (NS), which are frequently used in cardiovascular surgery. Canine external jugular and common femoral vein segments were preserved in the different solutions at 4 degrees C for 45 min and 24 hr. Rings (4-5 mm in length) from control and preserved veins were evaluated by isometric tension studies at 37 degrees C and by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Differences between groups were evaluated by Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test and by analysis of the variance, and considered to be significant at P < 0.05. Sensitivities to norepinephrine (NE) showed that a 45-min vein storage in AWB (5.7 +/- 0.2 mumol/L) but not in NS (5.8 +/- 0.2 mumol/L) or UWs (6.5 +/- 0.2 mumol/L) had a deleterious effect on function of smooth muscle (P < 0.05) when compared to control veins (6.6 +/- 0.2 mumol/L). Maximum contractile responses and sensitivities to NE were significantly altered (P < 0.05) after 24-hr vein storage in AWB (0.09 +/- 0.02 g/mm2 and 5.4 +/- 0.07 mumol/L) and NS (0.12 +/- 0.03 g/mm2 and 5.6 +/- 0.08 mumol/L) but not in UWs (0.36 +/- 0.06 g/mm2 and 6.4 +/- 0.07 mumol/L). With both storage times, acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent maximum relaxations and sensitivities were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in veins stored in AWB and NS, but not in UWs, compared with controls. Similarly, transmission electron microscopy revealed marked neutrophil migration beneath the intimal surface of vessels and extensive separation and desquamation of endothelial cells with exposure of subendothelial structures in veins stored in AWB and NS. The results suggest that UWs is a suitable storage medium when compared to AWB and NS.
authors.affiliation: Creighton Vascular Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Cavallari
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Abebe
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mingoli
authors.forename: W J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Hunter
authors.forename: D K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Agrawal
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sapienza
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cavallaro
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Edwards
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004285:Dogs; D004730:Endothelium, Vascular / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005268:Femoral Vein / Q000502:physiology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D007601:Jugular Veins / Q000502:physiology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D008297:Male; D008854:Microscopy, Electron; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000187:drug effects; D009126:Muscle Relaxation / Q000502:physiology; D009131:Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / Q000502:physiology; D009638:Norepinephrine / Q000494:pharmacology; D014021:Tissue Preservation / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D009638:Norepinephrine