Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate: a clinical and urodynamic evaluation.
OBJECTIVE
This prospective study evaluated the clinical and urodynamic changes in patients with obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with transurethral needle ablation (TUNA).


METHODS
One hundred twenty patients with obstructive uropathy due to BPH were treated with the TUNA procedure between January 1994 and December 1995. All patients were selected according to the criteria established by the guidelines proposed by the International Consensus Committee (World Health Organization, Paris, 1993). The TUNA procedure was performed in an outpatient setting using topical intraurethral anesthesia (2% lidocaine gel).


RESULTS
Patients showed a decrease in irritative symptoms as measured by the international Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and postprocedure urodynamic parameters. The mean (+/- SD) pretreatment IPSS was 20.8 +/- 4.5. At 3 months, the IPSS decreased to 9.7 +/- 3.0 (108 patients) (P < 0.001). At 6 months it decreased to 6.8 +/- 3.1 (86 patients) and remained at 6.2 +/- 2.9 (72 patients) and 6.7 +/- 3.8 (42 patients) at 12 and 18 months, respectively (P < 0.001). At 1 year after treatment, the peak flow rate (Qmax) increased from 8.2 +/- 3.4 mL/s to 15.9 +/- 2.1 mL/s and was 14.1 +/- 2.5 mL/s at 18 months of follow-up (P < 0.01). Urodynamic re-evaluation performed in 72 patients 12 months after TUNA demonstrated the absence of obstruction in 30 (41.7%). An additional 30 patients (41.7%) had equivocal results, whereas the remaining 12 (16.6%) still had obstruction, according to the Abrams-Griffith nomogram. Mean detrusor pressure at Qmax decreased from 85.3 +/- 18.5 cm H2O to 63.7 +/- 24.9 cm H2O at 12 months of follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results confirm that the TUNA procedure is safe and effective when performed as an outpatient procedure. In addition, TUNA produced better results in patients presenting with moderate to severe irritative symptoms and minimal obstruction as determined by pressure/flow studies.
Campo
B
B
Urology Department, Predabissi Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Bergamaschi
F
F
Corrada
P
P
Ordesi
G
G
D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D001748:Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014563:Urodynamics