title: [Clinico-radiologic considerations on "stress fractures" of the leg].
abstract: Stress fractures are ubiquitary and most often caused by the subject's activities. In the past they occurred mostly in recruits, but today they are frequent in sportsmen. Stress fractures most frequently occur in the lower limbs, especially in the distal leg. We reviewed 32 injuries observed January, 1993, to June, 1995, and found that 25% of them had been misdiagnosed as stress fractures: in the cases where the diagnosis was correct, fatigue fractures (32%) were less frequent than insufficiency fractures (68%) and occurred in young subjects (mean age: 24 years), usually sportsmen (2/3 of cases). Insufficiency fractures may occur in people aged 8 to 81 years (mean: 61 years) and in subjects with metabolic disorders (45.5%). Considering the injury biomechanics and the patient history and symptoms, these lesions appear a rather uncommon event, whose radiologic diagnosis must be confirmed by clinical findings, since radiology mostly (81.6% of cases) showed only the repair process, rather than the fracture itself. The radiologic patterns were classified into three groups: the fracture margin was not shown in 70% of cases (group I), where however intraperiosteal reaction and/or soft tissue effusion were found; bone fracture was shown in 3 cases (group II) and fracture sequels in 4 (group III), where bone thickening (3 cases) or abnormal consolidation (1 case) was found. There are several synonyms of "stress fracture" and confusion is increased because stress lines and other not necessarily abnormal signs such as Park or Harris lines, reinforcement or calcification lines, are often grouped together with stress fractures. Only accurate clinical examination and laboratory findings permit to distinguish fatigue from insufficiency stress fractures and the latter are also very difficult to differentiate from pathologic fractures. The differentiation of fatigue from insufficiency fractures, originally made by English speaking authors, may be confusing because the definition "pathologic fractures" should be reserved only to focal injuries while in the past it included also insufficiency fractures. Thus, only (bone) fatigue injuries in patients exercising intensely and constantly should be considered stress fractures. Conventional radiography is an indispensable tool and MRI is used in selected cases where the former method is negative and in the patients needing early mobility to go back to work. If radiographic findings are questionable for metastases, nuclear medicine is the method of choice and CT and/or MRI may be indicated as second-line diagnostic imaging tools.
authors.affiliation: Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche, Università degli Studi Federico II, Napoli.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Coppola
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Verrengia
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vallone
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Alfinito
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Molese
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Barra
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D005598:Fractures, Spontaneous / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies