Reading-based interference in cognitive arithmetic.
Do number-fact retrieval (4.6 =?) and numeral reading (e.g., transcoding 46 into "forty six") access the same retrieval structures? Data from the present experiment suggest that they do. Under instructions to respond quickly, adults performed simple multiplication problems oriented horizontally or vertically with operands presented simultaneously or with a 500 ms preview of one operand. Errors involving congruent operand intrusions (e.g., 2.8 = 24 or 9.6 = 36) were most frequent when conditions afforded the left-to-right encoding sequence that is standard for reading multi-digit numbers. Ninety percent of such intrusions involved the correct answer to another simple multiplication problem (e.g., 4.8 = 28) rather than a miscellaneous answer (e.g., 4.8 = 38). This high rate of arithmetically related intrusions suggests that numeral reading and verbal production of number facts involve a shared representational system.
Campbell
J I
JI
Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. Jamie.Campbell@USask.CA
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D008875:Middle Aged; D011932:Reading