title: Attitudes of US neurologists concerning the ethical dimensions of managed care.
abstract: We surveyed attitudes of US neurologists about the ethical dimensions of managed care by administering a written instrument containing paradigmatic cases portraying conflicts of physicians, patients, and managed care organizations (MCOs). After each case, we assessed neurologists' attitudes by asking them their degree of agreement with a series of statements. We found that neurologists (1) generally were willing to follow clinical practice guidelines if they were created by medical societies; (2) experienced frequent conflicts of interest or conflicts of obligation in the care of their MCO patients; (3) feared legal ramifications of their clinical decisions on MCO patients; (4) were unwilling to employ deception or gaming to achieve what they perceived to be good patient care; (5) believed that their professional prerogatives and autonomy were under attack by MCOs; and (6) felt that the good of their patients should not be sacrificed for the good of society.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03756, USA.
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Bernat
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Ringel
authors.forename: B G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Vickrey
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Keran
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D030881:Disclosure; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D008329:Managed Care Programs; D009462:Neurology; D040841:Resource Allocation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D035703:Therapies, Investigational; D014481:United States