title: [Andrologic/gynecologic microsurgery and fertilization in vitro: complementary approaches?].
abstract: The authors give their detailed results of andrological and gynecological microsurgical procedures and compare these to the cumulative results of their IVF work. They do defend the idea that to abandon microsurgery in favour of IVF and its last developments such as MESA & TESE is unreasonable and believe that every case demands a precise evaluation in which the gynecological situation and the age of the partner is mandatory.
authors.affiliation: SIMAF, Vilvoorde.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schoysman
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lejeune
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Van Roosendaal
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Segal
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D004822:Epididymis / Q000601:surgery; D005184:Fallopian Tube Diseases / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D007248:Infertility, Male / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008866:Microsurgery; D010049:Ovarian Diseases / Q000601:surgery; D019152:Paracentesis; D013094:Spermatozoa; D014669:Vasovasostomy