Leaving the nest: should vascular surgery seek board status separate from general surgery?
Current changes that impact on vascular surgery include altered financial support, the introduction of endovascular treatments, and possible reentrance of general surgeons into the vascular field. In addition, vascular surgery in competition with interventional specialties (radiology and cardiology) for patients. These changes and the enhanced competition mandate that vascular surgery and vascular surgeons adapt by becoming competent with endovascular techniques to perform their standard operations better and to provide newer, better treatments that replace standard vascular operations. Vascular surgery must also resolve its conflicts with the American Board of Surgery (ABS) and the Residency Review Committee in Surgery (RRC-S) so that adequate numbers of well-trained vascular surgeons will be available to care for vascular disease patients optimally. Whether this can occur by modifying the present system or by having a separate board and residency review committee in vascular surgery will depend on the willingness of the ABS and the RRC-S to recognize that vascular surgery is a separate specialty that is best performed by those with special training and commitment to this field.
Veith
F J
FJ
Division of Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
D002568:Certification; D013502:General Surgery / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000639:trends; D015642:Radiology, Interventional / Q000193:education; D013043:Specialties, Surgical / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D013044:Specialty Boards; D014481:United States; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends