title: Models of ratio schedule performance.
abstract: Predictions of P. R. Killeen's (1994) mathematical principles of reinforcement were tested for responding on ratio reinforcement schedules. The type of response key, the number of sessions per condition, and first vs. second half of a session had negligible effects on responding. Longer reinforcer durations and larger grain types engendered more responding, affecting primarily the parameter alpha (specific activation). Key pecking was faster than treadle pressing, affecting primarily the parameter delta (response time). Longer intertrial intervals led to higher overall response rates and shorter postreinforcement pauses and higher running rates, and ruled out some competing explanations. The treadle data required a distinction between the energetic requirements and rate-limiting properties of extended responses. The theory was extended to predict pause durations and run rates on ratio schedules.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1104, USA. lewisb@asuvm.inre.asu.edu
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Bizo
authors.forename: P R
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Killeen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D010856:Columbidae; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009042:Motivation; D051381:Rats; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule