title: Differing mechanisms of expression for short- and long-term potentiation.
abstract: Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a use-dependent form of synaptic plasticity that is of great interest as a cellular mechanism that may contribute to memory storage. It is the sustained phase of population excitatory postsynaptic potential induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS). HFS can also induce short-term potentiation (STP), a decremental potentiation lasting approximately 15 min. It has been unclear whether STP is simply a reversible form of LTP elicited by subthreshold stimuli or whether it is an independently expressed form of synaptic plasticity. We have attempted to clarify the relationship between LTP and STP in the extracellular recording technique in area CA1 of the adult rat hippocampal slice preparation to test four predictions of the hypothesis that LTP and STP are expressed via the same mechanism. First, occluding LTP expression should block STP expression. Saturating LTP under six different conditions, however, did not occlude STP expression. Second, occluding STP expression should occlude LTP expression. The partial or full occlusion of STP by two maneuvers (increasing the stimulus intensity used for HFS or applying 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine), however, did not occlude LTP expression. Third, LTP increases and decreases paired-pulse facilitation (PPF), and STP should have the same effect. STP did not change PFF, however. The first three results, then, suggest that STP and LTP are expressed via different mechanisms. Fourth, STP should be maximal near the LTP induction threshold, and then decrease above it. Surprisingly, STP was maximal at or very close to the LTP induction threshold, but it did not decrease above this threshold. This relationship suggests the possibility that STP and LTP share an induction step(s). What is the function of the independently expressed STP? We find that LTP can be induced by two HFSs, each of which is subthreshold for LTP, if the second is given during STP from the first. This suggests that STP can temporarily lower the LTP induction threshold. Three lines of evidence, then, suggest that STP and LTP may be expressed via different mechanisms; however, the proximity of STP saturation to LTP induction suggests that they may share an induction step(s). STP may also have the very important function of temporarily lowering the LTP induction threshold. Finally, these data suggestion caution in interpreting LTP data obtained <20-30 min after HFS, because they may be contaminated by STP, which appears to have different underlying mechanisms.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
authors.forename: P E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Schulz
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Fitzgibbons
mesh_terms: D015056:1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine / Q000494:pharmacology; D000818:Animals; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D006624:Hippocampus / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D017774:Long-Term Potentiation / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D009473:Neuronal Plasticity / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley
chemical_list: D015056:1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine