Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants.
Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order were examined using psychophysical studies of electrical detection thresholds in nonhuman primates. Subjects were trained using acoustic stimuli, then deafened in one ear and implanted with an electrode array for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Threshold vs pulse separation functions for trains of biphasic electrical pulses were compared for constant and alternating leading phase polarity. When leading phase polarity was held constant, threshold vs pulse separation functions were nonmonotonic (U-shaped). Small polarity-dependent (cathodic vs anodic leading phase) differences in absolute thresholds were observed at long pulse separations, but function shape was independent of leading phase. When leading phase polarity alternated, there was a pronounced reduction in thresholds at short pulse separations (below about 1 ms), resulting in monotonically increasing threshold vs pulse separation functions. At long pulse separations, functions for alternating and constant polarity stimuli were similar. Polarity effects were most apparent for longer duration trains (20 pulses) at long pulse durations (1-2 ms/phase). For stimuli consisting of only two biphasic pulses, alternating polarity effects depended on whether cathodic or anodic phases were adjacent. The neural mechanisms underlying these effects probably include refractory properties and/or residual potentials.
Miller
A L
AL
Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0506, USA.
Morris
D J
DJ
Pfingst
B E
BE
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology*; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D004566:Electrodes; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D008255:Macaca radiata; D008297:Male; D011601:Psychophysics