title: A study and meta-analysis of lay attributions of cures for overcoming specific psychological problems.
abstract: Lay beliefs about the importance of 24 different contributors to overcoming 4 disorders that constitute primarily cognitive deficits were studied. A meta-analysis of previous programmatic studies in the area was performed so that 22 different psychological problems could be compared. In the present study, 107 participants completed a questionnaire indicating how effective 24 factors were in overcoming 4 specific problems: dyslexia, fear of flying, amnesia, and learning difficulties. Factor analysis revealed almost identical clusters (inner control, social consequences, understanding, receiving help, and fate) for each problem. The perceived relevance of those factors differed significantly between problems. Some individual difference factors (sex and religion) were found to predict certain factor attributions for specific disorders. A meta-analysis of the 5 studies in this series yielded a 6-factor structure comparable to those of the individual studies and provided results indicating the benefits and limitations of this kind of investigation. The clinical relevance of studying attributions for cure is considered.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University College London, UK.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Furnham
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hayward
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000647:Amnesia / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D001294:Attitude to Health; D004410:Dyslexia / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007859:Learning Disabilities / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D008602:Mental Healing; D009042:Motivation; D010698:Phobic Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D012069:Religion and Psychology