title: [An evaluation of the protocols of the CME program. Do they satisfy the criteria for the working out of clinical protocols?].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the protocols published in the journal Formación Médica Continuada (FMC) since its appearance.
  
  
  METHODS
  An evaluation study.
  
  
  METHODS
  The journal FMC in Primary Care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Clinical protocols (11) published by the journal, and the people who have composed them.
  
  
  METHODS
  An evaluation based on the criteria for composing clinical protocols proposed by Saura et al.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall these proposals complied with 56.9% of the proposed criteria. None of them (0%) complied with all the norms that a protocol must meet. On analysing independently each criterion, the following were satisfied in all the protocols evaluated: the designation, index of pages, definition of the problem and bibliography. The protocol for COPE in Primary Care satisfied 75% of the criteria and was the protocol which complied with most criteria. The battered child protocol satisfied 41.66% of the criteria and was the protocol satisfying the least number of criteria.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These are good protocols, in that overall they satisfy a large part of the proposed criteria, despite the fact that these are demanding criteria. However they can and must improve.
authors.affiliation: Centro de Salud Barrio del Carmen, Murcia.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Leal Hernández
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Saura Llamas
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Saturno Hernández
mesh_terms: D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000592:standards*; D004502:Education, Medical, Continuing; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011320:Primary Health Care; D013030:Spain
vernacular_title: Evaluación de protocolos del programa FMC. Cumplen los criterios para la elaboración de protocolos clínicos?