title: The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our purpose was to determine the benefits of an acuity-adjusted labor management tool.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective review was performed of all deliveries at Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona, for a 1-year period from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1994. All physicians with > or = 20 deliveries were included in the analysis. Patients with indications for which most practitioners would perform a cesarean delivery were removed from consideration. Physicians were then compared with respect to labor management in the remaining patients without relative contraindications to vaginal delivery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The total number of deliveries (n = 6062) was performed by 47 attending obstetricians, 9 perinatologists, an obstetrics-gynecology clinic, and a family practice clinic. The "raw" cesarean section rate was 20.1%. Those at high risk for cesarean delivery (n = 534) were excluded, leaving 684 cesarean sections performed in 5528 patients (12.4%) who were appropriate to labor. Differences were observed between the nulliparous cesarean section rate (16%) compared with that for parous patients (10.1%) (p < 0.0001 by Fisher's exact test (two-tailed) but not between attending obstetrician-gynecologists (12.4%) and perinatologists (13.8%) (not significant).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A labor-adjusted cesarean section rate is more appropriate than just "raw" data. Medical, obstetric, and fetal factors affect a "raw" rate that is out of the control of the obstetrician. This method of assessing the labor and delivery skills of each practitioner and hospital would allow meaningful comparison with others.
authors.affiliation: Phoenix Perinatal Associates, AZ, USA.
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Elliott
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Russell
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Dickason
mesh_terms: D001130:Arizona / Q000453:epidemiology; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups; D005194:Family Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D009774:Obstetrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D009775:Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010500:Perinatology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011247:Pregnancy; D015995:Prevalence; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D014600:Utilization Review