Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma resection with tumor size used as a clinical prognosticator.
Three hundred sixty-four patients referred to the Chicago Otology Group for acoustic tumor removal between 1981 and 1995 were reviewed in a retrospective fashion. Of this group, 60 patients were candidates for hearing preservation surgery and thus underwent one of two surgical approaches to remove the tumor and preserve hearing. Eighteen patients had tumor removal via the middle cranial fossa approach, and 42 patients had tumor removed via the retrosigmoid approach. Of the 42 patients who underwent retrosigmoid removal, 33% had hearing preserved overall. Of the 18 patients in the middle fossa group, 44% had hearing preserved overall. The average tumor size of patients with preserved hearing in the retrosigmoid group was 1.4 cm, and in the middle fossa group was 0.74 cm. Of significance was the fact that in both groups of patients with a tumor of 1.5 cm or less there was a 50% chance of hearing preservation. In the group of patients with tumors larger than 1.5 cm there was only a 16% chance of preserving hearing. We propose that these data can be used for better counseling of patients preoperatively as to the chances of hearing preservation and the type of approach appropriate for each case.
Hecht
C S
CS
Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Honrubia
V F
VF
Wiet
R J
RJ
Sims
H S
HS
D000328:Adult; D001299:Audiometry; D005260:Female; D006309:Hearing; D006311:Hearing Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009464:Neuroma, Acoustic / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000145:classification / Q000209:etiology; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative / Q000379:methods