Comparative evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test and the in vitro chromosome aberration test: industrial experience.
Because of its rapidness, simplicity and potential for automation, the measurement of micronucleated cells in vivo is not only equivalent to the analysis of chromosome aberrations, but often even preferred within routine genotoxicity testing. In order to evaluate the correlation between the in vitro micronucleus assay (MNT) and the in vitro chromosome aberration test (CA), we collected data from four pharmaceutical companies obtained either in Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO-K5, CHO-K1, V79) or in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Among the 57 compounds included in this comparison, 45 compounds gave rise to concordant results in both assays (26 compounds negative in both assays; 19 compounds positive in both assays). The high percentage of concordance, i.e. about 79% is very promising and can be even increased to about 88% by omitting the 3 aneugenic compounds and 2 compounds inducing endoreduplicated chromosomes which were found positive only in the in vitro MNT. The results are remarkable in particular considering that most of the compounds evaluated are 'standard' pharmaceutical compounds and thus are at most weak inducers of chromosome damage. Our comparison strongly supports that the in vitro micronucleus test is a suitable alternative to the in vitro chromosome aberration assay. Moreover, the MNT has the potential of not only detecting clastogens but additionally aneuploidy inducing chemicals.
Miller
B
B
Vitamin Division, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Albertini
S
S
Locher
F
F
Thybaud
V
V
Lorge
E
E
D000818:Animals; D016466:CHO Cells; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D002869:Chromosome Aberrations; D006224:Cricetinae; D006801:Humans; D008214:Lymphocytes; D015162:Micronucleus Tests / Q000379:methods*; D009152:Mutagenicity Tests / Q000379:methods*; D009153:Mutagens / Q000633:toxicity; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
D009153:Mutagens