Laryngeal mask insertion following inhalational induction in children: a comparison between halothane and sevoflurane.
The aim of this study was to compare laryngeal mask insertion conditions following inhalational induction with either halothane or sevoflurane. Fifty-eight healthy children scheduled for dental extraction were randomly assigned to receive nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen and 3.0 MAC of either halothane or sevoflurane introduced in a stepwise fashion. The laryngeal masks were inserted when an adequate depth of anaesthesia was attained and the reactions and time to insertion noted. Inhalational induction was smooth in both halothane and sevoflurane groups. Induction time and time to laryngeal mask insertion were significantly faster with sevoflurane. The conditions for laryngeal mask insertion were generally good with 86.2% and 89.2% in the halothane and sevoflurane groups respectively having had no reactions to insertion. The complications to laryngeal mask insertion encountered were mild. The emergence time from the anaesthetic was found to be shorter for sevoflurane but the difference was not statistically significant.
Kwek
T K
TK
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Ng
A
A
D000766:Anesthesia, Dental; D018685:Anesthetics, Inhalation; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004987:Ethers; D005260:Female; D006221:Halothane; D006801:Humans; D017214:Laryngeal Masks; D008297:Male; D008738:Methyl Ethers; D009609:Nitrous Oxide; D011446:Prospective Studies; D000077149:Sevoflurane; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D014081:Tooth Extraction
D018685:Anesthetics, Inhalation; D004987:Ethers; D008738:Methyl Ethers; D000077149:Sevoflurane; D009609:Nitrous Oxide; D006221:Halothane