Accuracy of women's recall of opportunistic recruitment for cervical cancer screening in general practice.
Evaluation of strategies to improve opportunistic recruitment via general practice of women overdue for a cervical smear requires an accurate behavioural measure. As part of an experimental trial to evaluate the effect of a postgraduate workshop on preventive care, we conducted this methodological study to determine the accuracy of women's recall of an opportunistic discussion about cervical screening, by comparing it against audiotapes (n = 524). Taking the taped evidence of the trainee's verbal behaviour as the gold standard, sensitivity was 85 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 73.1 to 92.0 per cent) and specificity was 78 per cent (CI 73.9 to 81.6 per cent). Given the low rate of opportunistic recruitment by trainees in the main study, only one-third of positive recollections by women of an opportunistic discussion about cervical screening were correct. Until other measures have been validated, women's recall may continue to be used to measure general practitioners' behaviour, but an appreciation of likely bias is recommended.
Ward
J
J
Central Sydney Area Health Service, Newtown, NSW.
Sanson-Fisher
R
R
D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D015982:Bias; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000523:psychology*; D008568:Memory; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013637:Tape Recording; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*