title: Evolution of the cranial computed tomography scan in child abuse.
abstract: Computed tomography (CT) scans obtained at the time of clinical presentation have occasionally been reported to be normal in children with history and findings of significant abusive head injury. We have retrospectively observed abnormalities in "normal" scans of some similar children. We have also seen abnormalities develop on serial scanning. To determine how frequently these situations occur, we reviewed charts of 34 children with a final diagnosis of child abuse who also had cranial CT scans performed. Their CT scans were retrospectively reviewed by a pediatric radiologist. Eleven (11/34) CT scans had initially been interpreted as normal. Four (4/11) of these had been reinterpreted during the hospitalization as abnormal, affecting medical (1) and legal (3) outcome. Repeat scanning in three of the remaining seven resulted in surgical drainage of a subdural effusion (1) and affected legal outcome (2). Four of the seven initial scans felt normal throughout the hospitalizations were judged abnormal on retrospective review. This evaluation was confirmed in the two rescanned. Initial CT interpretation most often failed to appreciate changes in parenchymal density and small amounts of falcine or cortical subdural blood. Subsequent scans also showed evolving effusions and infarcts. Changes were noted in 1 1/2 to 5 days. The CT scan frequently shows subtle changes in the immediate posttrauma period. If the child does not recover promptly, subsequent scans frequently result in significant changes in clinical and legal management.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
authors.forename: K W
authors.initials: KW
authors.lastname: Feldman
authors.forename: D K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Brewer
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Shaw
mesh_terms: D001929:Brain Edema / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D019090:Case Management / Q000592:standards; D002544:Cerebral Infarction / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D002649:Child Abuse / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000628:therapy; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006259:Craniocerebral Trauma / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018450:Disease Progression; D005260:Female; D006408:Hematoma, Subdural / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013345:Subarachnoid Hemorrhage / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D013997:Time Factors; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000592:standards*; D016896:Treatment Outcome