Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.
To study comparative results between laparoscopic and open appendectomy, all the patients with suspected acute appendicitis who presented between January 1992 and December 1994 (N = 210) were randomized into two groups: laparoscopic (LA, n = 106) and open appendectomy (OA, n = 104). Patient demographics, pathological findings, operative time, postoperative course, and cost were analyzed. Age, gender, previous laparotomy, intraoperative diagnosis, and perforated appendix rate were comparable between both groups. Mean operative time was longer in the LA group (p < 0.05). Earlier resumption of a regular diet, shorter postoperative stay, and less postoperative analgesia also were observed in the LA group (p < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity and hospital readmissions were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Higher operative cost was observed in the LA group, but global cost was lower in this group (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic appendectomy shows a more comfortable postoperative course (oral resumption, postoperative stay, and analgesia) over open appendectomy, with similar postoperative morbidity. The LA group showed more operative but less global cost.
Macarulla
E
E
Department of Surgery, Hospital General Igualada, Barcelona, Spain.
Vallet
J
J
Abad
J M
JM
Hussein
H
H
Fernández
E
E
Nieto
B
B
D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D001062:Appendectomy / Q000379:methods*; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics; D008297:Male; D010359:Patient Readmission; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome